Controversial Clash and Stewards’ Silence: The Bastianini-Martin Incident Sparks MotoGP Debate

Did MotoGP Officials Err by Overlooking Bastianini-Martin Altercation?

The consequences of the altercation between Enea Bastianini and Jorge Martin ignite discussions in the newest episode of the Crash.net MotoGP podcast.

The Emilia Romagna race from Sunday became the primary topic of conversation, setting the stage for the discussions on this week's MotoGP podcast featured on Crash.net.

A contentious encounter on the final lap between Jorge Martin and Enea Bastianini saw Bastianini overtake the Pramac competitor, clinching victory in the race. Consequently, this event caused Martin's championship advantage over Francesco Bagnaia to expand by 20 points rather than 25.

However, since the FIM Stewards chose not to examine the incident, there was no formal decision made regarding the correctness of the action, which could potentially lead to complications down the line.

Martin has expressed his readiness to follow in Bastianini's footsteps, while Aleix Espargaro was shocked to learn that the Stewards did not believe the incident warranted further examination.

"Espargaro expressed confusion over the actions of the Steward panel, stating, 'When one rider made contact with another, leading both to go off-track, it wasn't even considered for investigation."

"I'm somewhat concerned, as the signal they're transmitting to every rider seems to imply that there are no boundaries to what one can do… This is an alarmingly perilous statement."

Podcast presenter Jordan Moreland opened the discussion by saying, "The controversy surrounding the final lap incident involving Enea Bastianini and Jorge Martin has definitely divided views. In my opinion, the decision not to penalize was correct. However, I'm keen to delve into the Stewards' perspective, which appeared to be missing in this instance. There wasn't a clear explanation provided as to why it went without investigation."

"Lewis Duncan, a MotoGP journalist for Crash.net, expressed the collective anticipation for clarity on the decision-making. He noted, 'Everyone was eager for some insight into the justification behind the result announcement. It occurred on the final lap, and it was far from a minor incident. Martin found himself significantly off the track, and Bastianini was also seen outside the track limits. Hence, Martin's irritation over the lack of any investigation is quite understandable."

Regarding setting a precedent, definitely, however, with these Stewards, it's clear that there's a lack of uniformity. There's this notion – although it's never been formally communicated to us by the Stewards – that during the final lap, the usual rules loosen up a bit. Essentially, you might be able to push the boundaries further than what's typically allowed in a standard race.

This year, an incident occurred at Le Mans where Franco Morbidelli collided with Aleix Espargaro during the final turn, causing Espargaro to drop several places. Surprisingly, the incident didn't lead to any formal inquiry, a situation that, understandably, left Espargaro quite displeased.

"However, during the Spanish Grand Prix, an incident occurred when Johann Zarco forced Pedro Acosta off his line on the first lap at Turn 5. Acosta dropped only one spot and managed to stay on the track, making the situation less severe than what happened in Misano. The officials later mentioned that Zarco would have faced a penalty had he not voluntarily returned the position."

"What's the boundary? That seems to be the question on everyone's mind. The absence of clarity – how are we and the competitors supposed to understand the guidelines for participation? It appears that this is the main problem, rather than debating whether Bastianini deserved a penalty or not."

Moreland continued, "Exactly, Pete. The Stewards should have made it clear, explaining the reason behind the absence of a penalty."

Crash.net's MotoGP chief, Pete McLaren, commented, "It's exactly these significant shifts that stick in our memory, right? Moreover, they serve as a benchmark for the riders when considering their next steps."

Keep in mind, the discussion isn't limited to just MotoGP competitors but extends to those in Moto2, Moto3, and the Red Bull Rookies. Each one observes such incidents and wonders, ‘Alright, what's the boundary here?’.

"In the final lap, the rules are more lenient. That's acceptable. However, there still needs to be some boundaries. For many, including Marc Marquez, this boundary is quite literal – it's the actual line that marks the edge of the race track: You must remain within the confines of the track.

In the past, there have been instances where competitors were penalized for actions that didn't even involve leaving the track. The enforcement of track boundaries is often so strict that it comes down to mere millimeters, with competitors instructed to give up a spot for infractions. Although this situation wasn't specifically about track limits, the point remains. What was required was some form of clarification.

Regarding the maneuver in question, opinions may vary. In my view, the majority would agree that the degree of contact was acceptable for a final lap, not veering into the realm of unsafe. However, it's also true that both Martin and Bastianini failed to navigate the turn successfully.

"What if the incident occurred on a quicker section of the circuit and both drivers had veered off? I believe the Stewards would likely have issued a penalty, but that's exactly the clarification we required from them.

"Essentially: 'Given it was a gentle curve and the final lap, Bastianini veered off course as a defensive maneuver to prevent further collision' or whatever the justification. Clarify why it was permissible for him not to remain on the track."

Each occurrence falls under the mandate requiring riders to conduct themselves sensibly, avoiding hazardous actions or securing an undue edge. Given the substantial amount of subjective interpretation required to assess this mandate, this is the reason for the existence of the Stewards panel.

"Remaining on the racing circuit is crucial since it clearly delineates right from wrong. It serves as a reliable indicator for determining whether the principles of responsibility and fairness have been violated, which is why it's common to hear competitors claim 'I completed the turn' as a justification for their behavior."

Typically, when one rider overtakes another, the leading rider is pushed wider on the track, yet manages to remain within its bounds. However, this action frequently leads to a summons by the Stewards, where penalties for 'interfering' with other competitors or being 'excessively aggressive' are not uncommon.

It's unexpected that the rider attempting to overtake made contact, failed to negotiate the turn as well, and yet, there was no inquiry into the incident.

"In my opinion, the Stewards made the right call in handling the situation between Alex Marquez and Bagnaia at Aragon by looking into it and clarifying their reasons for not proceeding with sanctions. Following their explanation, the consensus was generally one of agreement."

"Now, numerous riders are questioning, 'Is that something we can pursue going forward?'"

Moreland responded, "You've raised an interesting observation. The thorough examination of the Alex Marquez-Bagnaia situation was indeed enlightening. It gave the impression that they also reviewed data. They took the time to outline their methodology, yet in this case, there's complete lack of communication.

"What's your perspective on what Marc Marquez remarked, Lewis? Essentially, he suggested the maneuver was acceptable, provided Bastianini remained on the circuit."

Duncan responded, "The shift from all run-off zones being marked with green paint to those without green paint being unmonitored is quite foolish, especially when considering the importance of uniformity.

"However, this situation prompts us to ask, what if the area had been marked in green? It's understood that on the final lap, if a racer touches the green area, they are required to move back a spot. Would this rule have applied to Bastianini as well? This is yet another reason why it was important for the Officials to provide clarification."

"I believe Marquez provided a valuable perspective here, given his reputation as one of the more assertive riders. He was right in saying that executing an assertive pass is acceptable, as long as you maintain your position on the track!

"The issue arises whether Bastianini veered off course simply because he glanced back, among other reasons. However, the fact remains that he went off the track. This is precisely why an investigation was deemed necessary."

Moreland remarked, "The incident has sparked a lot of conversation around MotoGP, which is positive. The attempt to overtake on the last lap added a lot of excitement. Jorge Martin's response to the situation was commendable. However, he did mention that should he find himself in a similar scenario down the line, he might consider making a similar move."

McLaren stated, "That's the reason we require a formal clarification, to understand the boundaries in such scenarios. It appears that a majority of riders believe the boundary is significantly further than we anticipated."

Everyone enjoys witnessing overtaking maneuvers, and a bit of physical contact is generally acceptable. Fortunately, no one was injured, which is the most important aspect. However, the incident has raised numerous queries. Historically, we've observed notable overtakes at Laguna Seca, where competitors veered off course yet retained their spots. Such actions might not be permissible today, although, given Sunday's events, it's possible they could be.

Many individuals, among them several competitors, have expressed that everything was acceptable, attributing it to aggressive competition. It's noted that Bagnaia mentioned Martin had a comparable encounter with him in Qatar the previous year. However, despite the similarity in the intensity of the encounter, neither Martin nor Bagnaia were at risk of leaving the track in Qatar.

This ties back to Marc's point regarding the importance of sticking to the track. It's this discipline that ensures the riders adhere to specific boundaries of responsibility. So, now, does it make a difference if someone veers off the track by a metre, akin to Bastianini, or if they veer off the path at high speed in fifth gear, causing another to be pushed wide as well?

"Many riders hold the opinion that if their action causes another rider to crash, it will likely lead to an inquiry. Similarly, if they overtake another position by veering off the track, this too would prompt an investigation. This is the reason behind the numerous unresolved queries."

Duncan stated: "In my opinion, you need to divide it into two distinct sections: Did it benefit the show and was it the right choice to make. Did it enhance the show? Absolutely. Moreover, the Stewards found themselves in a tricky situation as they were not only determining the outcome of the race but also dealing with the ramifications it would have on the championship standings.

As someone who avidly follows the National Hockey League, it's noticeable that during the playoffs, officials seem to adopt a more lenient approach when it comes to calling penalties. They appear to avoid making pivotal calls to prevent being perceived as the deciding factor in crucial playoff matches. However, this approach can result in a decrease in credibility, as it leads to numerous infractions being overlooked.

"Thus, the Stewards find themselves in a challenging position that seems impossible to overcome, yet that's precisely their role. Their duty is to implement the existing regulations and, when required, to revise them. It's clear that an aspect of this is necessary since, as mentioned before, the regulations are quite unclear."

"Will this establish a new norm? Years ago, Sete Gibernau mentioned he believed the standard was already established during the 2005 Jerez event. It seems we've somewhat come to terms with this now."

"However, it's crucial to avoid situations where competitors collide and inflict harm on one another, as these incidents could ultimately influence the outcome of the championship."

"I believe there isn't a definitive response to whether the Stewards' decision to issue a penalty was right or wrong. However, it was a complete mistake on their part not to carry out an investigation."

Discover More

Sign Up for Our MotoGP Newsletter

Stay updated with the freshest MotoGP updates, exclusive content, one-on-one interviews, and special offers straight from the circuit to your email.

For additional details, please refer to our Privacy Policy.

Recent Updates

Further Updates

Site Navigation

CrashNet

©1999-2024 Crash Media Group

Copying or reproducing text, photos, or illustrations in whole or in part is strictly prohibited.