UN Calls for Global AI Oversight with Urgency Matching Climate Change Initiatives

To go back to this article, navigate to My Profile and then click on Saved stories to view them.

The United Nations Calls for Immediate Attention on AI, Comparable to Climate Change

Today, a report from the United Nations suggests that the organization should spearhead a worldwide initiative to supervise and regulate artificial intelligence, marking a first in global efforts.

The document, prepared by the High Level Advisory Body on AI for the UN Secretary-General, suggests establishing an organization akin to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. This proposed entity would be tasked with collecting current data on AI and identifying its potential dangers.

The study advocates for the initiation of a fresh dialogue on Artificial Intelligence at the United Nations, involving all 193 member countries, to explore potential dangers and forge consensus on subsequent steps. It also urges the UN to take measures to ensure that less affluent countries, particularly those in the global south, can both benefit from and help shape the future of AI. This includes the proposal to set up a fund specifically for AI projects in these countries, the development of universal AI standards and mechanisms for sharing data, and providing educational resources to assist in the management of AI. Some of these suggestions might be supported through the Global Digital Compact, a pre-existing strategy aimed at bridging the digital and data gaps between countries. Lastly, the report proposes the establishment of a dedicated AI office within the UN, tasked with synchronizing the UN's efforts to achieve the objectives laid out in the report.

"Alondra Nelson, a scholar at the Institute for Advanced Study and a member of the UN advisory group on the suggestion of the White House and State Department, points out that the global community acknowledges the dual nature of AI, recognizing both its potential dangers and benefits."

In recent times, the impressive skills shown by extensive language models and conversational AI have ignited expectations for a transformative boost in economic efficiency. However, they've also raised concerns among some specialists who caution that AI's swift advancement might lead to a scenario where it becomes challenging to manage. Shortly following the debut of ChatGPT, numerous researchers and business leaders endorsed a petition urging for a temporary six-month halt in the advancement of this technology to evaluate its potential dangers.

Urgent issues at hand involve the risk of AI being used to spread false information at a massive scale, create highly realistic fake videos and sounds, displace numerous jobs, and amplify existing biases through algorithms on a large scale. "There's a feeling of immediacy, and there's a collective agreement that collaboration is necessary," Nelson notes.

The suggestions from the UN highlight a global consensus among decision-makers on the need to oversee AI to reduce associated dangers. However, this urgency arises amidst a competitive race, primarily between the United States and China, to dominate a field that is anticipated to bring significant advantages in economics, science, and defense. Furthermore, these countries are defining their unique strategies for the application and regulation of this technology.

In March, the United States proposed a resolution to the United Nations encouraging member states to support the creation of AI that is safe, secure, and reliable. Following this, in July, China put forward its own resolution highlighting the importance of collaborative efforts in AI development and ensuring its broad accessibility. All members of the UN endorsed both resolutions.

"Artificial intelligence is a component of the rivalry between the United States and China, limiting the extent of their consensus," states Joshua Meltzer, a specialist at the Brookings Institute, a research organization based in Washington, DC. He points out that significant disagreements exist, particularly regarding the principles and standards AI should reflect, as well as safeguards concerning privacy and individual data.

Disparities in how affluent countries perceive artificial intelligence are beginning to create splits in the market. The European Union has implemented comprehensive AI regulations, including controls on how data is used, leading several American businesses to restrict access to their offerings in the region.

The passive stance taken by the US federal government has prompted California to introduce its own regulations for artificial intelligence. Initial drafts of these rules faced backlash from local AI enterprises, who argued that the requirements, such as mandatory reporting of their operations to authorities, were excessively burdensome. This feedback led to a dilution of the proposed regulations.

Meltzer points out the swift advancement of AI technology is outpacing the United Nations' ability to facilitate worldwide collaboration on its own. He emphasizes the significance of the UN in overseeing AI, but suggests a more decentralized approach is necessary, involving individual countries taking action as well. “The pace at which AI is advancing means that a single organization like the UN isn’t equipped to manage it effectively,” he remarks.

The United Nations document aims to find a mutual understanding among its member countries, highlighting the significance of human rights. "Framing the study with a focus on human rights is quite persuasive," mentions Chris Russell, a UK-based Oxford University professor specializing in global AI policy. "It grounds the research in the framework of international law, providing a wide scope and concentrating on the actual damages experienced by individuals."

Russell mentions the significant overlap in the tasks undertaken by governments to assess artificial intelligence for potential regulation. For instance, both the US and UK have distinct entities dedicated to scrutinizing AI systems for any improper activities. He suggests that the initiatives by the UN could help in minimizing this overlap. "Collaborating on a global scale and combining our resources is a very pragmatic approach," he remarks.

Governments might view artificial intelligence as a tool for achieving strategic superiority, but numerous researchers share apprehensions regarding AI. This week, a collective of distinguished scholars from both Western countries and China advocated for increased cooperation on AI security after a conference dedicated to the topic took place in Vienna, Austria.

Nelson, a member of the advisory committee, expresses her optimism that government officials can collaborate on significant matters. However, she emphasizes that the success of this collaboration largely hinges on the United Nations and its member countries' commitment to executing the outlined plan for cooperation. "The success lies in the specifics of how it's carried out," she notes.

Check Out These Suggestions …

Delivered straight to your inbox: A curated selection of the most fascinating and peculiar tales from the archives of WIRED.

Elon Musk poses a threat to national security

Interview: Meredith Whittaker's Mission to Challenge the Capitalist System

What's the solution for dealing with an issue like Polestar?

Occasion: Don't miss out on The Major Interview happening on December 3rd in San Francisco.

Additional Content from WIRED

Evaluations and Tutorials

© 2024 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. Purchases made through our website may result in WIRED receiving a share of the sales, due to our affiliations with various retail partners. The content on this website is protected and cannot be copied, shared, broadcast, stored, or utilized in any form without explicit consent from Condé Nast. Ad Choices

Choose a global website