New Jersey’s Bold $500 Million Strategy to Lead the AI Revolution and Its Economic Implications

To go back and read this article again, head to My Profile and then check out your saved stories.

Purchasing through the links in our articles might result in us receiving a commission. Discover more details.

New Jersey Takes a $500 Million Leap Toward AI Leadership

In a bold move to position itself as the leading center for AI in the United States, New Jersey has initiated a program that was sanctioned by the state’s governor on Thursday. This program will provide up to $500 million in tax incentives to attract artificial intelligence firms to establish their presence in New Jersey.

"New Jersey's aim is to be at the vanguard of the artificial intelligence breakthrough, creating a wealthier global community," stated Phil Murphy, the Democratic governor of New Jersey. "By accomplishing this, we plan to position New Jersey as the central hub for research and development in the field of generative AI," he added in a press release.

Firms specializing in artificial intelligence and the data centers fueling AI, which function on a grand scale within New Jersey, are eligible for tax incentives. These benefits reallocate unused resources from two separate state tax incentive schemes designed to stimulate job growth and property development as a reaction to the Covid-19 outbreak.

Opponents of the proposal are concerned that it may primarily benefit financially successful AI firms at the expense of the state. Data centers are known for their low employment needs, and tax breaks often given to technology companies can end up being more expensive than the benefits they bring. In their review of the legislation, the New Jersey’s Office of Legislative Services, a nonpartisan entity within the state legislature designed to offer unbiased assistance, mentioned that it’s unclear whether the legislation will ultimately have a beneficial or detrimental financial effect on the state.

The tax incentives are part of Murphy's ambitious "AI Moonshot" strategy for New Jersey, unveiled at the beginning of the year. Murphy has expressed his desire for these initiatives to position New Jersey as the primary hub for innovators in artificial intelligence.

New Jersey's CoreWeave, a native cloud service provider specializing in artificial intelligence, has recently secured $1.1 billion in funding, bringing its valuation to a robust $19 billion. The state stands to benefit significantly from leveraging the increasing need for data centers in the vicinity of New York. Data from commercial property experts CBRE shows a notable decrease in available leased spaces, with the vacancy rate dropping from 9.7 percent at the start of 2023 to 6.5 percent by the latter half of the year. Furthermore, CBRE's findings highlight that an artificial intelligence firm has already reserved space in East Windsor, a locale situated midway between New York and Philadelphia, signaling a growing trend in the sector.

AI companies are fueling an increase in venture capital investments. To operate, these lucrative enterprises require data centers. They will establish these data centers in various locations without the necessity for incentives. "This is an expanding, robust sector that does not require any governmental assistance to conduct its operations," states Kasia Tarczynska, a senior research analyst at Good Jobs First, an American policy resource center advocating for accountability in economic development from corporations and the government.

Tim Sullivan, the CEO of the New Jersey Economic Development Authority, points out that while data centers and AI companies may qualify for common business tax benefits in the US, these financial incentives are "not particularly targeted" in their approach.

He argues that New Jersey's strategy stands out among other states as it mandates beneficiaries of the tax incentive to allocate a portion of their computing resources at reduced prices or offer AI assistance to smaller enterprises or academic institutions. Despite the high costs associated with property in New Jersey, which boasts the highest corporate tax rate in the country, the benefit of being close to major population centers is a significant advantage for data centers. Establishing these facilities nearer to companies can also contribute to reduced latency.

Sullivan mentions that New Jersey hosts numerous major pharmaceutical firms, and highlights the importance of local data centers for these companies, especially if they incorporate artificial intelligence in developing new medications.

"Sullivan points out that for a small team of three, working at a desk to create something as revolutionary as Google or Tesla, whether it’s in AI or any other field, access to high levels of computing power is limited and highly prized. It's absolutely critical," he explains. Thus, beyond the creation of long-term positions by these enterprises, the offered tax benefits might also spur additional expansion and creativity among emerging companies, he suggests. "The possibilities for economic advancement are incredibly high," he notes.

Nonetheless, critical policy analysts argue that the AI exception might simply be a fresh presentation of an already familiar concept, especially as the surge in AI development leads to a significant rise in the need for data centers. "Historically, these tax break arrangements have been made to establish the essential facilities for these technology companies without yielding the expected benefits for the public," states Pat Garofalo, the head of state and local policy at the American Economic Liberties Project, a nonprofit advocating for governmental responsibility. Garofalo points out that the tax revenue forfeited is "frequently exorbitant" in relation to the number of jobs generated.

A study conducted in 2016 by Tarczynska revealed that when big corporations receive subsidies to construct data centers, governments typically miss out on over $1 million in tax revenue for every job that is generated. Often, these data centers provide between 100 and 200 permanent positions. While the immediate benefits to the local area might appear minimal, the Data Center Coalition, a trade organization, offers an alternative viewpoint. According to a research it sponsored in 2023, every single job at a data center is responsible for creating more than six additional jobs in various sectors.

In various other regions, resistance towards data centers is on the rise. The area around Northern Virginia, which has a large number of these facilities near Washington, DC, is experiencing political changes due to public opposition to the increasing number of data centers. In May, the governor of Georgia rejected a proposal that aimed to pause tax incentives for two years while the state assessed the energy consumption of these centers, which are quickly proliferating near Atlanta.

Despite challenges, major technology firms are continuing to expand their operations. Microsoft revealed in May its plans to construct a new artificial intelligence (AI) data center in Wisconsin. This venture involves a $3.3 billion investment and a collaboration with a local technical college. Through this partnership, they aim to train and certify over 1,000 students in the next five years, preparing them for employment in the new facility or for other IT roles within the area. Meanwhile, a month before Microsoft's announcement, Google disclosed its intention to establish a $2 billion AI data center in Indiana. This project is anticipated to generate 200 jobs. In exchange for committing to an $800 million capital investment, Google will receive a sales tax break for 35 years.

Across Europe, a conflicting strategy is unfolding: Certain urban areas, such as Amsterdam and Frankfurt, home to established data centers, are implementing new limitations. In Ireland, data centers consume a fifth of the country's energy usage—surpassing the total energy consumption of all residential homes—sparking debates about their environmental consequences. Conversely, some are pursuing the financial benefits: Before winning the latest UK election, the Labour Party in the UK pledged to simplify the process for constructing data centers.

The legislative proposal in New Jersey swiftly passed through the state's legislative body in June, being introduced and receiving approval from legislators within just a few weeks while the state was concluding its budgetary process. For eligibility, a company needs to have at least half of its workforce involved in activities related to artificial intelligence (AI), or derive half of its income from such activities. Additionally, these firms are required to invest a minimum of $100 million in capital and generate at least 100 new full-time positions.

The strategy has garnered backing from the local commercial community. "Given the rapid changes in AI technology, coupled with New Jersey's substantial taxes and business expenses, the competitive edge of our state is crucial," states Christopher Emigholz, the main governmental relations executive at the New Jersey Business & Industry Association.

Peter Chen, a leading policy expert at New Jersey Policy Perspective, a research organization, suggests that New Jersey aims to position itself at the forefront of the artificial intelligence sector. However, he questions the effectiveness of this strategy given the broad interpretation of AI, stating, "AI could encompass a wide range of technologies." Moreover, the rapidly growing AI industry faces several challenges, including the significant energy and water resources required by generative AI technologies. Additionally, firms specializing in advanced generative language and imagery technologies have come under scrutiny for potential copyright violations, and there are concerns that major corporations are hastily pushing these technologies forward without adequate safety measures.

Artificial intelligence firms are poised to establish these hubs, with tax breaks possibly serving as supplementary enticements. However, New Jersey aims to attract major companies with these incentives. “Our goal is for New Jersey to be at the forefront of this movement,” Sullivan states. “We want all developments to occur within our borders.”

Suggested for You…

Directly to your email: A daily selection of our most popular articles, curated personally for you.

A faulty CrowdStrike patch led to global computer outages

The Major Narrative: When Could the Atlantic Ocean Split Apart?

Introducing the age of intense online consumption

Olympics: Stay updated with all our Paris summer coverage right here.

Additional Content from WIRED

Evaluations and Manuals

© 2024 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. Purchases made through our website may generate revenue for WIRED via our affiliate relationships with various retail partners. Any form of reproduction, distribution, transmission, or other uses of the content on this site is strictly prohibited without explicit consent from Condé Nast. Ad Choices

Choose a global website