2024 Sakharov Prize: Conversations with the Winners and Nominees

Spread the word:

The event celebrating the recipients of the 2024 Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought, María Corina Machado and Edmundo González Urrutia, is scheduled for Tuesday, December 17.

Reporters interested in scheduling face-to-face interviews with Venezuela's President-elect Edmundo González Urrutia and Ana Corina Sosa, who represents María Corina Machado, the head of Venezuela’s democratic opposition, should fill out the registration form available via this EU survey link by Friday, December 6, no later than 18:00 CET. These interviews can be conducted in either English or Spanish. More information on the European Parliament's 2024 Sakharov Prize can be found here. Additionally, representatives of other finalists for the 2024 Sakharov Prize will be present in Strasbourg during the award ceremony week and are open for interviews. These include Zhala Bayramova, a human rights attorney and activist, who is also the daughter and representative of Dr. Gubad Ibadoghlu, an academic and anti-corruption campaigner from Azerbaijan; Reem Al Hajajra, the director of Women of the Sun; and Pascale Chen, the coordinator of Women, Wage, Peace. English interpretation services will be available. Please be aware that submitting a request does not ensure an interview slot. Applicants will be notified of their interview status by Wednesday, December 11. Interviews are scheduled for Monday afternoon, December 16, and Tuesday afternoon, December 17.

In addition, journalists have the opportunity to join a hybrid media seminar featuring this year’s Sakharov Prize winners and finalists, along with Members of Parliament. This event is set for Tuesday, December 17, from 9:00 to 11:15. For more details, refer to the program here. To sign up, please reach out to media-seminars@europarl.europa.eu.

Connections:

Elodie LABORIE

Eliana CAPRETTI

Additional details

Details about the product

Distribute this page:

Updates

Legislature in your nation

Resources

Leader of the European Parliament

European Parliament

Parliament's presence on social platforms

Informational resources

Deforestation Legislation: Council Agreement Grants Businesses an Additional Year for Compliance

Spread the Word:

Businesses will receive an additional year to align with new EU regulations aimed at curbing deforestation. These regulations will prohibit the sale of goods originating from deforested areas within the EU.

On Tuesday night, representatives from the Parliament and Council came to a tentative political consensus to delay the enforcement of the new regulations. Under this agreement, major operators and traders will be required to comply with the obligations of this regulation starting on December 30, 2025, while micro and small businesses will have until June 30, 2026. This extension aims to provide companies worldwide with sufficient time to integrate the rules effectively from the outset, ensuring the law's goals are not compromised.

The Commission suggested delaying the implementation of the deforestation regulation by a year. This decision comes after EU member states, non-EU nations, traders, and operators expressed worries about their ability to completely adhere to the regulations if they were enforced by the close of 2024.

After Parliament introduced changes to establish a new category for nations deemed as posing "no risk" in terms of deforestation, the Commission committed to evaluating the possibility of simplified regulations for countries that have proven effective and sustainable forest management strategies.

An "emergency break" provision has been added, allowing for further delays in implementing the Regulation if the online platform intended for businesses is not fully functional by December 30, 2025, or if the risk classifications for countries are not released at least six months in advance.

Statement

Following the agreement, Christine Schneider, the Parliament's rapporteur from the EPP in Germany, expressed satisfaction, stating, "We made a commitment and followed through: A one-year extension has been secured, allowing more time for businesses, foresters, farmers, and authorities to prepare. Additionally, we have made sure that the Commission will finalize the online platform and risk categorization promptly, providing greater predictability for everyone involved in the supply chain. Furthermore, an impact assessment and further streamlining will occur during the review phase for low-risk countries or regions, encouraging them to enhance their forest conservation efforts."

We would have liked these enhancements to be directly incorporated into the legislation, but the Council, to our disappointment, declined. Now, the responsibility falls to the Commission to fulfill its promises. As members of Parliament, we will keep a close eye on this procedure since cutting down on red tape is a pressing necessity.

Future actions

The decision on the informal deal reached by the co-legislators is scheduled to be included in the agenda for the European Parliament's upcoming plenary session, which is set to take place from December 16 to 19. For the delay to become effective, both the Parliament and the Council need to approve the agreed-upon text, and it must be published in the EU Official Journal before the year concludes.

Introduction

According to the United Nations' Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), deforestation has claimed 420 million hectares of forest land from 1990 to 2020, an expanse surpassing the size of the European Union. The European Union's consumption is responsible for approximately 10% of worldwide deforestation, with palm oil and soybeans making up over two-thirds of this impact.

On April 19, 2023, Parliament approved a regulation targeting deforestation, with the goal of addressing climate change and the decline of biodiversity. This initiative seeks to curb deforestation linked to the EU's consumption of goods such as cattle, cocoa, coffee, palm oil, soy, wood, rubber, charcoal, and printed paper. The regulation took effect on June 29, 2023, and companies are required to comply with its rules starting December 30, 2024.

Contact Details:

Thomas HAAHR

Additional Details

Product Details

Distribute this page:

Updates

Parliamentary Presence in Your Nation

Resources

Head of the European Parliament

European Legislative Body

Parliament's Social Media Presence

Informational Resources

Law on Deforestation: Council Agreement Extends Compliance Deadline for Companies

Share this page:

Businesses are granted an additional year to adjust to new EU regulations aimed at stopping deforestation, which will prohibit the sale of goods derived from deforested areas within the EU.

On Tuesday night, representatives from the Parliament and Council arrived at a tentative political agreement to delay the enforcement of new regulations. Major operators and traders are now required to comply with the obligations outlined in this regulation starting on December 30, 2025, while micro- and small businesses have until June 30, 2026. This extension aims to assist companies globally in seamlessly adopting the rules from the outset, without compromising the law's goals.

The Commission suggested delaying the implementation of the deforestation regulation by a year. This decision came after EU member states, non-EU countries, traders, and operators expressed worries about their ability to fully adhere to the rules if they were enforced by the end of 2024.

After Parliament introduced changes to establish a new classification for nations that pose "no risk" regarding deforestation, the Commission committed to evaluating the possibility of streamlined regulations for countries that have shown successful and sustainable forest management.

A provision for an "emergency break" has been added, allowing for a further delay of the Regulation if the online portal for businesses is not completely functional by December 30, 2025, or if the risk classifications for countries are not released at least half a year in advance.

C

Following the agreement, Christine Schneider, the rapporteur from the European People's Party (EPP) in Germany, stated: "We made a commitment and have followed through: a one-year delay has been granted, allowing businesses, foresters, farmers, and authorities an extra year to get ready. Furthermore, we have secured a commitment from the Commission to finalize the online platform and risk categorization promptly, providing greater predictability for everyone involved in the supply chain. Lastly, an impact assessment and additional simplification measures will be introduced during the review phase for countries or regions considered low risk, offering an incentive for nations to enhance their forest conservation practices."

While we had hoped for these enhancements to be directly incorporated into the legislation, the Council unfortunately declined. Now, it falls to the Commission to fulfill its promises. In our capacity as Parliament, we will keep a vigilant eye on this development, as there is an immediate need to cut down on red tape.

Subsequent

The informal agreement reached by the colegislators is set to be included in the agenda for the upcoming plenary session of Parliament scheduled for December 16-19. For the delay to be officially implemented, the agreement must receive approval from both the Parliament and the Council and be published in the EU Official Journal by the year's end.

Context

According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, approximately 420 million hectares of forest have disappeared due to deforestation from 1990 to 2020, a region exceeding the size of the European Union. The European Union's consumption contributes to roughly 10% of this worldwide deforestation, with palm oil and soybeans making up over two-thirds of the impact.

The regulation addressing deforestation, which was approved by Parliament on April 19, 2023, seeks to combat climate change and the decline of biodiversity by curbing deforestation linked to the EU's use of products such as cattle, cocoa, coffee, palm oil, soy, wood, rubber, charcoal, and printed paper. This regulation has been effective since June 29, 2023, and requires companies to comply with its rules starting December 30, 2024.

Connect with:

Thomas HAAHR

Additional details

Details about the product

Distribute this page:

Updates

Parliamentary activities in your nation

Resources

Leader of the European Parliament

European Parliament

Parliament's presence on social platforms

Informational resources

New EU Deforestation Rules: Companies Granted Additional Year for Compliance

Businesses have been granted an extra year to adjust to forthcoming European Union regulations aimed at curbing deforestation. These rules will prohibit the sale of goods produced on deforested land within the EU.

On Tuesday night, representatives from both the Parliament and the Council came to a temporary political consensus to delay the enforcement of the new regulations. Major operators and traders are now required to adhere to these regulations beginning on December 30, 2025, while micro- and small businesses have until June 30, 2026. This extension is designed to assist companies globally in integrating the rules effectively from the outset, ensuring the law's goals remain intact.

The Commission suggested delaying the enforcement of the deforestation regulation by a year. This decision came after EU member states, countries outside the EU, traders, and operators expressed worries about their ability to meet the requirements if the rules were implemented at the end of 2024.

After lawmakers made changes to establish a new group of nations considered to pose "no risk" to deforestation, the Commission committed to evaluating the possibility of streamlining rules for countries that have shown they manage their forests effectively and sustainably.

An "emergency break" provision was added to allow for further delays in the Regulation if the digital platform for businesses isn't up and running by December 30, 2025, or if the risk assessments for countries haven't been released at least half a year in advance.

Statement

Following the agreement, Christine Schneider, the rapporteur from the European People's Party in Germany, stated, "We made a promise and have fulfilled it: A one-year delay has been approved, allowing businesses, foresters, farmers, and authorities an extra year to get ready. Additionally, we made sure the Commission will finish both the online platform and risk categorization promptly, providing greater predictability for everyone involved in the supply chain. Finally, during the review phase, an impact assessment and further simplification will be conducted for regions or countries with low risk, encouraging these areas to enhance their forest conservation efforts.

The ideal outcome would have been for these enhancements to be legally codified, but regretfully, the Council declined. The responsibility now falls on the Commission to fulfill its promises. As members of Parliament, we will be vigilant in overseeing this procedure, given the critical necessity of streamlining administrative processes.

Future actions

The informal agreement reached by the colegislators is set to be included in the agenda of Parliament's upcoming plenary session, scheduled for December 16-19. For the delay to become effective, both Parliament and the Council must approve the text, and it must be published in the EU Official Journal by year's end.

Context

According to the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), approximately 420 million hectares of forest, which surpasses the size of the European Union, were destroyed due to deforestation from 1990 to 2020. The European Union's consumption is responsible for about 10% of worldwide deforestation, with palm oil and soybeans contributing to over two-thirds of this impact.

On April 19, 2023, Parliament passed a regulation designed to combat climate change and loss of biodiversity by curbing deforestation linked to the EU's use of products such as cattle, cocoa, coffee, palm oil, soy, wood, rubber, charcoal, and printed paper. The regulation, effective since June 29, 2023, requires companies to begin complying with its rules by December 30, 2024.

Contact Details:

Thomas HAAHR

Additional Details

Product Details

Distribute this page:

Updates

Parliament in your nation

Resources

Leader of the European Parliament

European Legislative Body

Parliament's presence on social platforms

Informational Links

2024 Sakharov Prize: Conversations with Winners and Nominees

Spread the word:

On Tuesday, December 17, the ceremony honoring María Corina Machado and Edmundo González Urrutia, recipients of the 2024 Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought, is set to take place.

Journalists interested in interviewing Venezuela's President-elect Edmundo González Urrutia or Ana Corina Sosa, the daughter and spokesperson for María Corina Machado, a leader of Venezuela’s democratic movement, can sign up through this EU survey link. The deadline to register is by 18:00 CET on Friday, December 6. Interviews will be conducted in either English or Spanish. Additional details about the European Parliament’s 2024 Sakharov Prize can be found here. Other finalists for the 2024 Sakharov Prize will also be present in Strasbourg during the award ceremony week and open for interviews. These include Zhala Bayramova, a human rights lawyer and activist, representing her father Dr. Gubad Ibadoghlu, an academic and anti-corruption activist from Azerbaijan; Reem Al Hajajra, the director of Women of the Sun; and Pascale Chen, the coordinator of Women, Wage, Peace. English interpretation services will be available. Please be aware that submitting a request does not ensure an interview slot. Confirmation of your interview status will be provided by Wednesday, December 11. Scheduled interview times are on the afternoons of Monday, December 16, and Tuesday, December 17. Additionally, journalists can attend a hybrid media seminar featuring this year’s Sakharov Prize winners and finalists, along with Members of Parliament. This seminar is set for Tuesday, December 17, from 9:00 to 11:15. For further details, the program is available here. To register, please contact: media-seminars@europarl.europa.eu.

Contact Persons:

Elodie LABORIE

Eliana CAPRETTI

Additional Details

Details about the Product

Distribute this page:

Updates

Parliamentary Affairs in Your Nation

Resources

Leader of the European Parliament

European Parliament

The Parliament's Presence on Social Platforms

Reference Links

Deforestation Legislation: Council Agreement Extends Compliance Deadline for Companies

Spread the word:

Businesses are granted an additional year to adjust to new European Union regulations aimed at curbing deforestation. These rules will prohibit the sale of goods originating from deforested areas within EU markets.

On Tuesday night, representatives from both the Parliament and Council came to a tentative political deal to delay the implementation of the new regulations. Under this agreement, large businesses and traders are required to comply with the new rules starting December 30, 2025, while micro- and small businesses have until June 30, 2026. This extension aims to provide global companies with ample time to effectively adopt the regulations from the beginning, ensuring the law's goals remain intact.

The Commission has suggested delaying the enforcement of the deforestation regulation by a year. This recommendation comes after EU member states, countries outside the EU, as well as traders and operators, expressed worries about their ability to fully adhere to the regulations if they were to be implemented by the end of 2024.

After Parliament introduced changes to establish a new classification for nations considered to pose "no risk" regarding deforestation, the Commission committed to a forthcoming evaluation of streamlined criteria for countries that have shown successful and sustainable practices in managing their forests.

A provision for an "emergency break" has been added to allow for further delays in the Regulation's implementation. This would occur if the online platform designated for businesses is not up and running by December 30, 2025, or if the risk assessments for countries are not released a minimum of six months in advance.

Statement

Following the agreement, Christine Schneider, the European Parliament's rapporteur from the EPP in Germany, stated: "We made a promise and we've fulfilled it: a one-year delay has been approved, granting businesses, forestry workers, farmers, and authorities an extra year to get ready. Additionally, we made sure the Commission will finalize the online platform and categorize risk promptly, providing greater predictability for everyone involved in the supply chain. Lastly, during the review phase, there will be an impact assessment and further simplification for countries or regions classified as low risk, offering them an incentive to enhance their forest conservation efforts."

While we hoped these enhancements would be directly incorporated into the legislation, the Council regrettably declined. Now, the responsibility falls on the Commission to fulfill its promises. As Parliament, we will keep a vigilant eye on this development, since cutting down on red tape is a pressing necessity.

Future actions

The decision on the informal deal made by the co-legislators is set to be included in the schedule for Parliament's upcoming plenary meeting, which will take place from December 16 to 19. For the delay to become effective, the approved document must receive backing from both Parliament and the Council and be published in the EU Official Journal before the year concludes.

Context

According to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, approximately 420 million hectares of forest, surpassing the size of the European Union, were cleared due to deforestation from 1990 to 2020. The European Union's consumption contributes to about 10% of worldwide deforestation, with palm oil and soybeans making up over two-thirds of this impact.

The regulation targeting deforestation, approved by Parliament on April 19, 2023, seeks to combat climate change and halt biodiversity decline. It does so by curbing deforestation linked to the EU's consumption of goods such as cattle, cocoa, coffee, palm oil, soy, wood, rubber, charcoal, and printed paper. The regulation has been in effect since June 29, 2023, and mandates that businesses comply with its rules starting December 30, 2024.

Contact Details:

Thomas HAAHR

Additional details

Details about the product

Distribute this page:

Updates

Parliamentary presence in your nation

Resources

Leader of the European Parliament

European Legislature

Parliament's presence on social platforms

Informational resources

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is topping the charts in transforming sectors such as news analysis political trends, and the automotive industry. AI's machine learning is revolutionizing quick reporting and data-driven decisions in public administration. In the automotive sector, trends are leaning towards autonomous vehicles, driving innovation in smart transportation. With these technological advancements and predictive analytics playing a significant role in political decision-making and public policy, there's a pressing need for government regulations to tackle ethical AI and legislative impact.

In an era where the fusion of technology and daily life is rapidly becoming the norm, the term "AI News Politics Automotive" embodies the zenith of this convergence. From top innovations in Artificial Intelligence (AI) that are reshaping news analysis, political trends, and the automotive industry, to the predictive analytics revolutionizing political decision-making, AI is no longer a futuristic concept—it's the here and now. This article delves deep into the fabric of how AI applications are influencing public policy, legislative impact, and smart transportation, offering a comprehensive look at the new age of data-driven decisions.

Amidst this technological renaissance, the role of AI in political policy predictions cannot be overstated. Autonomous vehicles are just the tip of the iceberg in an ocean of machine learning and government regulations that navigate the complex waters of innovation in politics. As we explore the technological advancements in AI, we uncover the new frontier that is set to shape the future of the automotive industry and beyond.

This article will take you through an intricate journey from the rise of connected vehicles to the ethical AI considerations in public administration. With each section, we aim to provide insights into how the synergy between AI, news analysis, political trends, and automotive developments is not only relevant but critical in understanding the direction of modern society. Join us as we unravel the AI in action, real-world applications that are transforming the way news is curated, policies are formulated, and vehicles are designed.

• 1. "Top Innovations in AI: Reshaping News Analysis, Political Trends, and the Automotive Industry"

1. "Top Innovations in AI: Reshaping News Analysis, Political Trends, and the Automotive Industry"

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into various sectors is undoubtedly reshaping the landscape of our daily lives. Among the top innovations in AI, we are witnessing significant advancements in news analysis, the discernment of political trends, and the automotive industry. These AI applications are not only enhancing efficiency but also offering new insights and predictive analytics that are invaluable in a data-driven world.

In news analysis, AI algorithms are being employed to sift through enormous volumes of information to identify and summarize key events and trends. This machine learning approach to News Analysis Political enables faster reporting and provides a deeper understanding of global occurrences, ensuring that the public stays well-informed.

AI is also playing a pivotal role in analyzing and predicting political trends. These technological advancements offer unique perspectives, enabling data-driven decisions in public policy and government regulations. AI-driven policy predictions can anticipate the outcomes of legislative actions, providing a strategic tool for public administration and innovation in politics.

The automotive industry is perhaps one of the sectors most visibly transformed by AI. Autonomous vehicles, powered by sophisticated AI systems, are becoming a reality, changing the face of smart transportation. These connected vehicles not only promise enhanced safety and efficiency but also pose questions regarding ethical AI and legislative impact. The convergence of AI applications in automotive technology signals a move towards a future where transportation is more accessible and environmentally friendly.

AI's intervention in the automotive sector also raises the need for new government regulations. As we move closer to mainstream adoption of autonomous vehicles, public policy must adapt to ensure safety and privacy standards are maintained. The predictive analytics provided by AI can aid in creating regulations that are preemptive rather than reactive.

Technological advancements in AI are thus not limited to the creation of new products and services but extend to affecting political decision-making and legislation. The implications of these advancements are vast and varied, from smart transportation to public policy, and from news analysis to the very nature of public administration.

As we continue to navigate through these transformative times, it is clear that AI will remain at the forefront of reshaping industries. The top innovations in AI are not just changing how we operate within these fields but are also setting the stage for an interconnected, more intelligent future.

In conclusion, the exploration of "AI News Politics Automotive" reveals a multidimensional space where top innovations in artificial intelligence (AI) are not only reshaping how we interact with news analysis, political trends, and the automotive industry but also redefining the very fabric of public administration and policy predictions. The infusion of machine learning and predictive analytics into political decision-making and legislative impact is creating a new era of data-driven decisions, where AI applications hold the potential to streamline and enhance public policy.

Moreover, the automotive sector's leap towards smart transportation and connected vehicles, underscored by advancements in autonomous vehicles and ethical AI, showcases the transformative power of technological advancements. As government regulations evolve to keep pace with innovation in politics and industry, the integration of AI into these spheres promises a future where political trends are anticipated with greater accuracy, and news analysis becomes more sophisticated, providing a clearer lens through which the public can view the world.

The implications of AI within the realms of news, politics, and automotive are vast and complex. However, one thing remains clear: as we navigate this convergence, the commitment to ethical considerations and the careful management of AI's legislative impact will be paramount. The journey ahead for AI News Politics Automotive is one of discovery, challenge, and immense opportunity, promising a new age of technological advancements that could ultimately lead to more informed citizens and smarter, more sustainable transportation solutions.

For more insights into this rapidly evolving intersection of AI, news, politics, and automotive innovation, stay tuned to our platform, where we continue to delve into the latest developments and their implications for our digitized world.

Public opinion survey reveals haste in assisted dying discussions, according to Sky News

The survey also indicated that although 62% are in favor of the legislation, a significant 70% are worried that it might pressure disabled individuals into choosing assisted dying unwillingly.

Political journalist @fayebrownSky

Monday, December 2, 2024, 5:

A survey has revealed that most people believe the discussions surrounding assisted dying have been hastily conducted.

A DeltaPoll survey conducted for Sky News revealed that 60% of respondents believe additional information is necessary for individuals to decide on the legality of the issue.

Politics Live: Starmer Faces a Major Leadership Decision

Generally, the public believes that Members of Parliament should be given four months to examine the proposal, but in practice, they have only had three months.

While 62% are in favor of the proposed legislation, a significant portion, 70%, express concern that individuals with disabilities might be pressured into choosing assisted suicide involuntarily.

On Friday, a majority of Members of Parliament supported a measure to legalize assisted dying in England and Wales, setting the stage for a potential alteration in legislation.

The proposed legislation would enable adults with a terminal illness and a prognosis of six months or less to live to seek medical help to voluntarily end their lives.

Further Discussion on Assisted Dying

Reflecting on my mother's final days: Could assisted dying have been part of our discussions?

Emotional Release as Parliament Supports Assisted Dying: 'Now I Can Pass Away Peacefully'

Voting Woes: Euthanasia Legislation Approved, Louise Haigh Steps Down

Associated Subjects:

The study conducted by DeltaPoll took place from November 22 to November 25, shortly before the significant vote.

The results reflect worries expressed by Members of Parliament and activists about the schedule and protections associated with the law.

For an enhanced viewing experience, it is recommended to utilize the Chrome browser to

A significant concern is that it may cause individuals who are vulnerable and disabled to feel as though they are a burden to society, and that obtaining help to end one's life should not be simpler than finding support to continue living.

During Friday's debate in the Commons, Labour MP Diane Abbott, a staunch opponent of the legislation, expressed her concerns by stating, "Should this bill be approved, it would transform the NHS into a completely funded suicide service, while at most, only 30% of palliative care would receive funding."

Concerns have been raised regarding a potential "slippery slope" effect – that although the legislation currently targets terminally ill adults, its scope could eventually expand to encompass individuals with chronic illnesses or disabilities.

Labour's Kim Leadbeater, the proponent of the bill, has asserted that this concern is unfounded, stating that her proposed legislation includes the strongest protections of any assisted dying laws globally.

This entails the approval from two separate physicians and a High Court judge for the request to proceed, along with a potential prison sentence of up to 14 years for anyone convicted of pressuring someone to pursue assisted dying.

Further Information: Explore how your representative voted on the assisted dying legislation. Is Canada's approach to assisted dying going too far?

Subscribe to our channel to stay updated on all the latest news.

The decision taken on Friday propels the bill into several phases of examination, requiring the green light from both parliamentary chambers for it to be enacted into law.

Legislators will have the opportunity to propose changes to the bill during its forthcoming committee phase, the schedule for which remains to be determined.

For an optimal video viewing experience, it is recommended to use the Chrome browser

Supporters of the legislation have suggested that they might be open to revising their stance as the bill progresses, due to worries about the adequacy of palliative care and protective measures.

During the Commons debate on Friday, prominent Conservative MP Sir David Davis expressed his support for the objectives of the bill but emphasized the need for Parliament to have more time to "get this right."

"I'll cast my vote in favor today, yet I'm hopeful that the government will support a robust bill that I can confidently vote for in the final round," he stated.

Additionally, Labour MP Chris Webb indicated that his stance might evolve as the proposals advance, stating that although he thought the bill "should move forward" in parliament for additional examination, he "will reassess my stance during the subsequent phases."

Associated Subjects

Footer for Sky News

Information About Sky News

Services Offered by Sky News

Channels Under Sky

Additional Sky Websites

Assisted dying: Public feels rushed debate, survey reveals

A survey conducted for Sky News discovered that although 62% of respondents favor the legislation, a significant majority (70%) expressed worries that disabled individuals might be pressured into choosing assisted dying involuntarily.

Political correspondent @fayebrownSky

Monday, December 2, 2024, 5:

Most people believe that discussions about assisted dying have been hurried, according to a survey.

A DeltaPoll survey conducted for Sky News revealed that 60% of respondents believe that additional information is necessary for individuals to form an opinion on its legalization.

Politics Live: Starmer Faces Major Leadership Test

The general consensus is that Members of Parliament should be given four months to examine the proposal; however, they have only been allocated three months.

While 62% of people are in favor of the legislation, a significant portion (70%) expressed worry that it might lead to disabled individuals being pressured into considering assisted suicide involuntarily.

On Friday, a majority of Members of Parliament supported a measure to legalize assisted dying in England and Wales, setting the stage for a potential alteration of the law.

The proposed legislation would enable adults with a terminal illness and a prognosis of six months or less to live to seek medical help to voluntarily end their lives.

Further Discussion on Assisted Dying

Reflections on My Mother's Final Days: Could We Have Considered Assisted Dying?

Emotional release and gratitude as lawmakers support assisted dying: 'Now I can pass away peacefully'

Voting Woes: Assisted Suicide Legislation Approved, Louise Haigh Steps Down

Associated Subjects:

DeltaPoll conducted a poll from November 22 to November 25, shortly before the significant voting event.

The results reflect the worries expressed by Members of Parliament and activists about when the law will be implemented and the protections it includes.

For an optimized video experience, it's recommended to use the Chrome browser.

A key criticism is that it may cause individuals who are vulnerable or disabled to feel as though they are a burden to others, and that the option for assisted death should not be more readily available than support for living.

During the debate in the Commons on Friday, Labour MP Diane Abbott, a staunch opponent of the bill, expressed her concerns by stating, "Should this bill be approved, it would transform the NHS into an entirely funded suicide service, while at most, only 30% of palliative care would receive funding."

Concerns are also growing regarding a potential "slippery slope" effect—initially, the legislation targets terminally ill adults, but there is apprehension that its scope could expand to encompass individuals with chronic illnesses or disabilities in the future.

Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, the proponent of the bill, has emphasized that this concern is unwarranted. She asserts that her proposed assisted dying legislation includes the strongest protections found globally.

The process requires the consent of two independent physicians and the approval of a High Court judge, with a potential prison sentence of up to 14 years for anyone who coerces another person into pursuing assisted dying.

Discover Further: What was your representative's stance on the assisted dying legislation? Has Canada overstepped boundaries with its assisted dying policies?

Subscribe to our channel to stay updated with all the latest news.

The voting on Friday indicates that the bill will now progress through several phases of examination and must be passed by both parliamentary chambers to eventually be enacted into law.

Legislators will have the opportunity to propose changes to the bill during its upcoming phase, known as the committee stage, the date of which has not yet been determined.

For an optimal video viewing experience, it is recommended to utilize the Chrome browser

Supporters of the legislation have suggested that they might rethink their position as the bill progresses, due to worries about the adequacy of palliative care and protective measures.

During the parliamentary discussion on Friday, veteran Conservative MP Sir David Davis expressed his support for the objectives of the bill but emphasized that Parliament requires additional time "to get this right."

"I plan to support it in today's vote, yet I hope the administration will assist in shaping a commendable bill for the final vote," he stated.

Additionally, Labour MP Chris Webb indicated that his stance might evolve as the proposals advance, noting that although he thinks the bill "deserves to progress" through parliament for additional examination, he "will reconsider my position at the subsequent stages."

Associated Subjects

Footer of Sky News

Information About Sky News

Services Provided by Sky News

Sky Network Channels

Additional Sky Websites

"Is Reform UK Capturing the Attention of Gen-Z Males?"

Reform UK has swiftly made inroads with the younger demographic through TikTok, amassing over 300,000 followers — a higher count than any other significant political party. However, the question remains: Will this be sufficient to secure the 'bro vote'?

By Serena Barker-Singh, political correspondent and Isobel Losseff, politics producer

Tuesday, December 3, 2024, 9:

Fireworks, pyrotechnics, and balloons set the stage at Reform UK's conference, making it stand out from the rest. During their September meeting, Nigel Farage's party emphasized its unique approach and distinct offerings.

Across the National Exhibition Centre in Birmingham, displays showcased visuals of the party's leader. As Mr. Farage was set to deliver his address, attendees gathered eagerly to listen. When he took to the stage, an extensive video compilation highlighting moments from his life, accompanied by a musical soundtrack, was shown in the background.

In the gathering of nearly 4,000 attendees, the expected group of older supporters with gray hair was noticeable, yet there was also an unexpected presence of numerous young, white men.

For an improved video experience, we recommend using the Chrome browser.

Following the unexpected comeback of Reform's leader to prominent political roles, he has intensified his use of language that challenges the status quo. His repeated claim is that the political establishment is against Nigel Farage's success.

Reform UK is grappling with the challenge of having five MPs, positioning it within the same parliamentary establishment it frequently criticizes. The party's immediate task is to move beyond being predominantly associated with Nigel Farage and to broaden its appeal to a larger group of supporters.

In his keynote address, Mr. Farage emphasized a critical point: Reform Party needed to mature and strategize for the future. Observing the attendees, it appeared that the next generation of the party's leadership was already present.

According to a post-election analysis by YouGov, although Reform primarily attracts older white male supporters, it emerged as the third favorite party among men aged 50 to 64, closely trailing the Tories by just one percentage point.

However, indications suggest increasing backing among younger demographics, particularly among males aged 18-24, where Reform ranks as the third preferred option, tied with the Green Party.

👉 Tune into the Sky News Daily podcast on your favorite podcast platform 👈

For Generation Z women, this choice was equally unpopular as the Conservative option. However, the most significant difference in preferences by gender appeared among 16-17-year-olds.

In a striking revelation from a JL Partners survey conducted during the week of the general election, Mr. Farage's party matched Labour in popularity among young male voters within that demographic. However, the situation was quite different for young women, where Reform UK significantly trailed behind Labour and the Green Party.

In a political party where the average age of its members of parliament is 60, what strategies are being used to attract younger constituents?

The rise of social media platforms favored by Generation Z, such as TikTok, plays a significant role. Reform quickly connected with a younger demographic on the platform, amassing 308,100 followers, which surpasses the follower count of any other significant political party, narrowly beating Labour's 233,100 followers.

Nigel Farage revealed that his personal TikTok account has surpassed one million followers. He shared this milestone last week at a press conference where he also noted that his party's membership numbers had climbed to 100,000.

He provided a detailed analysis of the age demographics of his social media audience. "Every month, we receive millions of views. Of those, two-thirds are from individuals younger than 35 years old. Furthermore, half of these viewers are under 25 years old. There's something extraordinary occurring with Generation Z," he noted.

Not only TikTok was influential. According to a Crowdtangle analysis, Reform UK garnered significantly more interactions on their social media pages than any other party during the election across various platforms.

Right-wing political influencers, such as Nicholas Lissack, are among its youthful adherents.

Dressed sharply, Nick, a student known for his staunch conservative beliefs, was taken aback when his initial TikTok video endorsing Reform UK became an overnight sensation during the lead-up to the 2024 general election. The video quickly amassed nearly 4 million views in just a day, in which he encouraged fellow first-time voters to join him in backing Reform UK.

A week after, Nick was behind the scenes at a Reform UK rally before the election, where he met his "political hero," Mr. Farage. In a different video, he describes their discussion as "beautiful," covering topics from the "ridiculous" cost of beer and golf to political matters.

He characterizes his videos as "brief, lively, and full of vigor… It looks like I'm really enjoying myself." The titles of the videos are catchy as well; a quick look at his TikTok profile reveals two-minute clips with titles such as Labour Hates Us, Is Reform UK Fascist? and Ban Notting Hill Carnival. This vibrancy extends to X/Twitter, where he's amassed a large following of tens of thousands.

However, he acknowledges that his opinions are not universally held among his colleagues.

"While I may have lost several friends during this period, I managed to amass 40,000 new followers on Twitter."

Since our last conversation, his following has increased by an additional 10,000.

What is the situation regarding women?

Reform UK took pride in having a candidate contest almost every seat.

However, the advocacy organization 50:50 Parliament pointed out that fewer than 20% of the candidates were female. The party selected five white males for constituencies they considered likely to win, resulting in the election of Nigel Farage, Richard Tice, Rupert Lowe, and James McMurdock to parliament.

In a provocative statement this year, Mr. Farage described Andrew Tate, who openly expresses misogynistic views, as "a significant spokesperson for men," during an interview with Sky News.

Tate has been prohibited from using YouTube due to violations of its hate speech guidelines. Additionally, he faces bans on Facebook, where Meta has labeled him a "dangerous individual." Furthermore, he faces accusations of rape, human trafficking, and involvement in organized crime, all of which he refutes.

Nick credits his candidness regarding political views for the popularity of his videos, which he believes resonate with men who feel marginalized by the latest wave of feminism.

"Reform presents a compelling option as it is inclusive… Young men are attracted to it as they view it as a chance to actively engage in politics," he stated.

A fresh face has emerged in the conservative political arena, George Finch. Over the recent summer, he gained attention similar to that of Nick by creating content endorsing Mr Farage's political group. Subsequently, he launched an online publication titled The New Reformer, which he markets as a platform "By Reformers, for Reformers". The magazine features boldly titled articles such as "Project 2029 – dismantling the woke state" and "Since When Is It Divisive to Be British?".

He believes the party is successful in appealing to female voters.

"It's incorrect to claim that women are discouraged by Reform. If you believe there's an issue, I'm confident that the headquarters are addressing it."

Is it effective?

"Dr. Jilly Kay, a senior lecturer in Communication and Media at Loughborough University, noted that TikTok proved to be an effective platform for Reform," she explains. "Nigel Farage's engaging style and his ability to resonate with audiences really came through. This is reflected in the growing support from young male voters."

However, she believes that Reform has the potential to connect with a deeper element, offering clear direction to voters who have been left feeling uncertain following a stretch of turbulent political times.

"From a young age, men are often discouraged from certain actions, and Farage aims to restore a sense of liberty," Dr. Kay states. "Reform UK embodies this notion of empowerment and liberty, which figures like Farage argue is withheld from men and boys."

Further reading: Advocacy for stricter regulations on teenagers' mobile phone usageLouise Haigh shares a photo of her stolen phone, allegedly taken post-theft

However, some specialists caution that the increase in support from young people might be exaggerated.

"Reform clearly resonates with certain subsets of the youth electorate, particularly young males from less affluent backgrounds who are less likely to pursue higher education," states Dr. Stuart Fox, an advanced instructor in political science at the University of Exeter.

Dr. Fox asserts that Reform UK does not enjoy as much support from the younger electorate as parties like the Greens, Liberal Democrats, and Labour do. He highlights the difficulties in reaching out to the young voter segment that would be most inclined to back them.

"Reform predominantly attracts young men from less affluent backgrounds, yet these individuals are the least inclined to participate in voting. It will pose a significant challenge for Reform to leverage this appeal effectively in upcoming elections."

Initial indications of the party's ability to leverage the so-called "bro vote" will emerge during the upcoming local elections next year. This will be a crucial trial for the party, and should they prevail, their aspirations are significant.

Reform UK aims to solidify its position and not just rival the Conservatives as the primary right-wing faction in UK politics, but also to ultimately take the reins of power in Britain.

👉Tune into the Politics At Jack And Sam's podcast on your favorite listening app👈

In a statement, Reform UK claimed: "Reform UK is currently leading the way in British politics, evidenced by the growing number of young voters rallying behind us.

Membership has now exceeded 100,000, and our survey numbers continue to grow. Young voters are increasingly aware that both the Conservatives and Labour haven't met their needs, signaling a demand for change in Britain.

"We aim to capitalize on this energy as we approach the upcoming May elections and beyond, providing genuine alternatives for the youth."

Associated Subjects

Footer for Sky News

Information about Sky News

Services Provided by Sky News

Sky Network Channels

Additional Sky Websites

Individuals targeted by online harassment granted access to the identity of their harasser

Under new policy guidelines, authorities will have the authority to disclose the identity of individuals engaging in online stalking as soon as possible, following the incident involving former "Coronation Street" actress Nicola Thorp.

Political correspondent @fayebrownSky

Tuesday, December 3, 2024 12:04

The government has announced that new "right to know" powers will enable police to disclose the identities of individuals engaging in online stalking.

The modification was prompted by the ordeal of former "Coronation Street" star and presenter Nicola Thorp, who suffered harassment from a man who created nearly 30 social media profiles to bombard her with aggressive, misogynistic communications.

Politics Live: Starmer Faces a Major Decision in His Leadership

Authorities have stated that they cannot disclose the name of the suspect who was apprehended, even though he previously mentioned being so near to Ms. Thorp on a train that he "could smell" her.

The individual, who referred to himself as The Grim Reaper in several of his communications, is presently incarcerated for a 30-month term and has been issued a lifetime restraining order, which was first revealed to her in court when his real identity was disclosed.

Previously, The Times reported that even though she had obtained a stalking protection order before his trial, she still didn't know his appearance, which meant she couldn't alert authorities if he violated the order.

The authorities have announced that they will implement new statutory guidelines titled 'right to know' that will enable police to disclose the identity of online stalkers as soon as possible. These guidelines will clarify the disclosure procedures for officers.

Jess Phillips, the minister responsible for safeguarding and addressing violence against women and girls, informed Sky News that the newly introduced policy is "merely an initial move towards bettering these circumstances." She also noted that the government plans to review the adequacy of current stalking laws, which haven't been revised since 2012.

Ms. Thorp, who has collaborated with the government to enhance safety measures for stalking victims, expressed her approval of the new initiative.

She stated: "Stalking victims have long been vulnerable, suffering under the actions of their stalkers and a justice system that hasn't sufficiently shielded them.

"The latest policies will enable victims to reclaim essential control over their lives and assist law enforcement in holding perpetrators accountable."

For optimal video playback, consider using the Chrome browser.

The government has additionally declared that Stalking Protection Orders, which prohibit offenders from approaching or communicating with their victims within a specified distance, will be more broadly accessible.

Under the revised system, courts will have the authority to issue orders post-conviction, even if such orders were not established prior to the trial. This marks a change from the existing procedure, which requires that an order be in place beforehand.

The Home Office stated that this measure will prevent inmates from reaching out to their victims while incarcerated.

Further Reading: Man claims he was stalked for 27 years and alleges police initially mocked his complaints. Bar employees to receive training on handling drink spiking incidents.

Judicial authorities can now issue restraining orders against individuals who have been found not guilty, provided there is sufficient evidence indicating they may still pose a threat to the complainant.

Additional modifications feature a fresh legal structure designed to facilitate collaboration among community services, ensuring that lapses in information sharing do not lead to anyone being overlooked.

The Home Office is set to introduce nationwide guidelines for programs aimed at stalking offenders, aiming to standardize practices throughout England and Wales.

Stay ahead with the latest Breaking News

Download the Sky News application at no cost

The set of actions comes after a caution issued earlier by several oversight bodies, who noted that police often fall short in safeguarding individuals from stalking.

Approximately 14% of individuals aged 16 and older in England and Wales have experienced stalking at least once, according to statistics.

In unveiling the initiatives, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper described stalking as a "terrible crime".

She emphasized, "Make no mistake, we are committed to utilizing every resource at our disposal to empower victims and strip power from their abusers."

Sky News Information

About Sky News

Services Provided by Sky News

Sky Broadcasting Channels

Additional Sky Websites

The Conservative party allocated £50 million to flights for deporting individuals to Rwanda, however, these flights did not depart. It was disclosed by the Home Office that the Rwanda asylum plan cost a total of £715 million over two years as the government worked to implement it.

Political correspondent @fayebrownSky

Monday, December 2, 2024, at 21

New data shows that the previous administration allocated £50 million for Rwanda-bound deportation flights that were ultimately never executed.

The expenses encompassed not only booking the aircraft but also hiring personnel to ensure migrants boarded the flights and for the maintenance and security of the airstrips, according to documents from the Home Office.

Politics Live: Labour supporter predicts 'disastrous' start to the new year due to upcoming tax increases in the budget

Funding for the asylum program totaled £715 million before being discontinued by the Labour party following the general election in July.

The breakdown of expenses also shows payments of £290 million to the Rwandan government, £95 million allocated for detention and reception facilities, and £280 million spent on information technology, personnel, and legal costs.

The data was released while Home Secretary Yvette Cooper was delivering a speech on immigration in the House of Commons.

She mentioned that from the time the Rwanda agreement was initiated to the time it was terminated, 84,000 individuals undertook journeys in small boats.

—

Latest in Politics

Political Update: Downing Street supports restrictions on unhealthy food ads, while questions arise about the products included.

'Gen-Z's Surprising Shift' – Is Reform UK Capturing the Young Male Demographic?

Why TikTok Fans Admire Nigel Farage

"She stated that the supposed preventive measure failed to lead to even one deportation or halt a single vessel from traversing the Channel."

"For the UK taxpayer, it was an appalling squandering of funds."

First introduced by Boris Johnson in April 2022, the Rwanda scheme aimed to transfer asylum seekers arriving in the UK via small boats across the English Channel to the landlocked East African nation of Rwanda.

The goal was to discourage additional small boat crossings; however, critics argued that there was no concrete proof it would succeed in doing so.

By the general election, following the tenure of two prime ministers, the program had yet to be implemented due to multiple legal hurdles.

For an enhanced video experience, it is recommended to utilize the Chrome browser.

Further Reading: Starmer opts for a cautious approach, steering clear of specifying migrant limits in upcoming government overhaul. Minister rejects comparisons of Labour to 'shoddy' Conservatives following Louise Haigh phone controversy.

Upon assuming office, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer quickly abolished the program, announcing that the funds would be redirected to establish a new Border Security Command focused on dismantling gangs involved in criminal human smuggling.

Since his electoral victory, over 20,000 individuals have made the journey across the Channel in small vessels, according to statistics released on Sunday.

The annual count has reached 33,684, with a higher number of crossings occurring in the five months under Labour’s rule compared to the first six months of 2024 when the Conservatives held power.

Subscribe to our channel to stay updated with all the latest news.

According to sources within the Labour Party, the 13,574 instances of crossings recorded from January to July represent an "unprecedented" figure for this period of the year. This number marks a 19% rise compared to the same timeframe in 2023, a 5% increase over 2022, and is over twice the amount noted in 2021.

They noted that weather was a major factor in the increased numbers during the summer.

In her address to the Commons, Ms. Cooper committed to overhauling the immigration system, noting that a significant new agreement with Iraq would aid in reducing the flow of undocumented migrants to the UK.

Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch stated that measures like the Rwanda scheme are being evaluated by her party as potential effective deterrents against illegal immigration, as they introduce a "new approach" to migration policies.

Sky News Footer Information:

About Sky News

Services Provided by Sky News

Channels Under Sky

Additional Sites from Sky