EP TODAY, Tuesday, February 11

Spread the word about this page:

.

European Union Reacts to Tariff Threats Issued by Trump

Starting at 9:00, a full assembly discussion will take place with Commissioner Šefčovič and Poland’s Minister for EU Affairs, Szłapka. The focus will be on the present condition of trade relations between the EU and the US, the role of multilateralism, and how the EU might react if the US decides to implement tariffs on goods from Europe.

By Eszter ZALÁN

Belgian phone number: 0477 99 20

EP Commerce

Russia's conflict in Ukraine reaching its third anniversary

Beginning at approximately 10:00, Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) are set to evaluate the effects of Russia's ongoing three-year conflict with Ukraine, as well as the European Union's steadfast backing of Ukraine, in a discussion featuring Commissioner Kos and Poland's Minister for EU Affairs, Adam Szłapka. A resolution will be voted on in the plenary session scheduled for March. At midday, Ruslan Stefanchuk, the head of Ukraine's Verkhovna Rada, will deliver a speech to the MEPs in an official session.

Viktor Almqvist

Phone number: +32 470 88 29

European Parliament Foreign Affairs

Snjezana Kobescak Smodis

Phone Number: +32 470 96 08

EP_ForeignAffairs

The European Union's Approach to the Middle East

At approximately 3:00 PM, members of the European Parliament are set to engage in a discussion concerning recent events in the Middle East and potential future strategies for the EU in that area. This debate will involve Commissioner Šuica and Poland's Minister for EU Affairs, Szłapka.

Snjezana Kobescak Smodis

Phone number: +32 470 96 08

EP_ForeignAffairs

Viktor Almqvist

The phone number is +32 470 88 29

Unfortunately, I cannot provide a

Seminar on the Digital Services Act and Media

At 2:00 PM, the Press Service of Parliament will hold a seminar for the media titled "Defending Europe's Digital Integrity: Addressing Social Media Challenges and Foreign Interference," featuring key Members of the European Parliament who are experts on the topic.

Yasmina Yakimova

Phone number: +32 470 88 10

EP_CommonMarketplace

Summary

The United States has imposed limitations on the export of semiconductor chips to certain European Union nations. During a plenary session, questions will be directed to Commission Vice-President Virkkunen regarding strategies to respond to the U.S. decision to limit chip exports used in AI technology, with discussions starting around 8 PM.

Increasing violence in Congo. Lawmakers are set to evaluate the ongoing conflict and the humanitarian emergency in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) during discussions with the Council and Commission, scheduled to begin at approximately 4:00 PM. A resolution is expected to be voted on this Thursday.

Safeguarding the framework of global justice is on the agenda. A plenary session is scheduled to begin at approximately 9:00 PM, focusing on the preservation of international justice systems and their key bodies, notably the International Criminal Court and the International Court of Justice. The discussion will feature Commissioner McGrath and Poland's Minister for EU Affairs, Szłapka.

Healthcare industry. The European Union is currently facing significant hurdles due to a lack of healthcare workers and concerns about job quality in this field. These issues will be the central topics of a discussion involving Commission Vice-President Mînzatu, scheduled for the early afternoon, right after the voting session concludes.

Protests against the government are occurring in Serbia. Beginning at approximately 5:00 PM, Members of the European Parliament plan to discuss the situation in Serbia with Commissioner Kos and Poland's Minister for EU Affairs, Szłapka. This follows a tragic incident at a railway station where a canopy collapse resulted in fatalities, which has ignited an anti-corruption movement and demonstrations spearheaded by students against the Serbian government.

Ballots

The full assembly is scheduled to cast votes at 12:30, with several items on

You can watch the plenary session live on Parliament’s webstreaming service and EbS+.

To find more comprehensive details about the session, kindly refer to our newsletter.

Discover additional details about the plenary session.

Contact Details:

Media Center

Details about Products

Distribute this Page:

Updates

Parliamentary Activities in Your Nation

Resources

Leader of the European Parliament

EU Parliament

Parliament's Social Media Presence

Reference Links

Statement from EU Leaders Regarding Ongoing Support for Ukraine

Distribute this information:

The EU's Conference of Presidents has issued a declaration reaffirming the steadfast commitment to aiding Ukraine, now three years into Russia's full-scale aggressive conflict.

It has been three years since Russia initiated a full-scale aggressive war against Ukraine, an action lacking provocation, justification, and legality, which breached international law, defied the United Nations Charter, and threatened security in Europe and worldwide. The European Parliament Conference of Presidents once more denounces Russia's continuing aggressive campaign, which includes intentional attacks on civilians and essential infrastructure, as well as the horrific acts committed against the people of Ukraine, all of which are grave breaches of international law and humanitarian principles.

We express our unwavering support for the citizens of Ukraine as they consistently show remarkable bravery and strength in protecting their sovereignty, independence, and territorial unity.

The European Union needs to stay cohesive in its dedication to aiding Ukraine, encompassing political, military, economic, humanitarian, and financial aid. We praise the actions of Member States, institutions, civil society groups, businesses, and individuals who have rallied resources and offered shelter to millions of Ukrainians forced to flee their homes. Meanwhile, we urge the EU and its Member States to boost and expedite their support, especially in terms of military aid, and to create a legal framework for seizing Russian-owned assets that have been frozen by the EU.

We persistently advocate for justice regarding all war crimes and acts against humanity that have occurred in this aggressive conflict. We are encouraged by the recent progress towards creating a Special Tribunal to address the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine.

We urge for ongoing and increased military aid for Ukraine, which should include supplying defense gear, offering training, and providing strategic support essential for maintaining Ukraine's right to defend itself as outlined in Article 51 of the UN Charter.

The European Union reiterates its dedication to providing enduring and sustainable financial and economic aid to Ukraine. This includes macro-financial assistance, backing for reconstruction efforts, support for economic and social recovery, and actions to bolster the resilience of Ukraine's economy and essential infrastructure.

We urge the complete enforcement and substantial broadening of sanctions, incorporating robust strategies to stop any evasion, targeting Russia and its allies. The goal is to decisively weaken their ability to conduct warfare and to ensure accountability for those involved in acts of aggression and breaches of human rights.

We wholeheartedly endorse Ukraine's desire to integrate into Europe. The European Parliament is dedicated to helping Ukraine move forward on its journey to joining the EU, acknowledging the substantial advancements it has made in reforms despite facing extremely difficult conditions.

Amidst a difficult global and geopolitical climate, we emphasize the crucial need to uphold solidarity across the Atlantic and worldwide with Ukraine, while actively combating Russian misinformation. We further underscore the necessity for the international community to remain attentive to the impacts of this conflict and to back Ukraine in its pursuit of a thorough, fair, and enduring peace, in line with the Ukrainian peace strategy.

As we reach the third anniversary of this harsh conflict, the European Parliament's leaders commend the enduring spirit of the Ukrainian population and honor those who have given their lives for liberty and democratic principles. Our support for Ukraine remains unwavering, and we reiterate our belief that peace, safety, and justice will ultimately triumph.

Contact Persons:

Jüri LAAS

Delphine COLARD

Additional Details

Product Details

Distribute this page:

Updates

Parliamentary Presence in Your Nation

Resources

Leader of the European Parliament

European Legislative Body

Parliament's Social Media Presence

Resource Connections

Statement from the European Parliament's Conference of Presidents on Sustaining EU Assistance to Ukraine

Distribute this information:

Declaration from the Conference of Presidents affirming the European Union's steadfast commitment to supporting Ukraine, three years following Russia's comprehensive military aggression.

It's been three years since Russia initiated its large-scale, unwarranted, and illegal military assault on Ukraine, breaching international norms, the UN Charter, and jeopardizing both European and worldwide stability. The European Parliament's Conference of Presidents has once more denounced Russia's continuous aggressive actions, which include intentional attacks on civilians and essential infrastructure, as well as the heinous acts perpetrated against the people of Ukraine, all of which are grave breaches of international and humanitarian law.

We express our unwavering support for the citizens of Ukraine, who persistently show remarkable strength and bravery in protecting their nation's sovereignty, independence, and territorial borders.

The European Union needs to stay cohesive in its dedication to aiding Ukraine with political, military, economic, humanitarian, and financial support. We praise the actions taken by Member States, institutions, non-governmental organizations, businesses, and individuals who have rallied to help and offered shelter to millions of Ukrainians forced to flee their homes. Concurrently, we urge the EU and its Member States to enhance and expedite the provision of their assistance, especially in terms of military aid, and to create a legal framework to enable the seizure of Russian-owned assets that have been frozen by the EU.

We persistently advocate for holding individuals responsible for all war crimes and crimes against humanity that have occurred during this aggressive conflict. We are encouraged by the recent progress towards forming a Special Tribunal to address the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine.

We urge for ongoing and increased military aid to Ukraine, which should include supplying defense equipment, offering training, and providing strategic support essential for maintaining Ukraine's right to self-defense as outlined in Article 51 of the UN Charter.

The European Union reiterates its dedication to providing ongoing and sustainable financial and economic support to Ukraine. This includes macro-financial aid, backing for reconstruction efforts, and initiatives aimed at economic and social recovery. Additionally, the EU is committed to implementing measures that will strengthen Ukraine's economic resilience and protect its vital infrastructure.

We urge for the complete enforcement and considerable broadening of sanctions targeting Russia and its allies. This includes implementing strong actions to stop any attempts to bypass these restrictions, with the goal of thoroughly crippling Russia's ability to conduct warfare and ensuring that those guilty of aggression and human rights abuses face consequences.

We wholeheartedly back Ukraine's ambitions to integrate with Europe. The European Parliament is dedicated to helping Ukraine move towards joining the EU, acknowledging the remarkable strides it has made in reforms despite facing tough challenges.

Amid a complex global and geopolitical landscape, it is crucial to uphold solidarity across the Atlantic and worldwide with Ukraine and to combat Russian misinformation. We emphasize the necessity for the international community to remain attentive to the impacts of this conflict and to assist Ukraine in securing a full, fair, and enduring peace in line with the Ukrainian peace plan.

As we acknowledge the third anniversary of this harsh conflict, the European Parliament's leaders commend the strength of the Ukrainian citizens and honor those who have given their lives in the pursuit of liberty and democratic values. Our support for Ukraine remains unwavering, as we emphasize our belief that peace, stability, and justice will ultimately triumph.

Contact Details:

Jüri Laas

Delphine Colard

Additional Details

Item Details

Distribute This Page:

Updates

Parliament in Your Nation

Resources

Leader of the European Parliament

European Parliament

Parliament on Social Platforms

Info Connections

Media Briefing: Appeal for EU Backing of the International Criminal Court (ICC)

Spread the News:

The head of the Human Rights Subcommittee is set to conduct a media briefing in Strasbourg today, following the announcement of an executive order by President Trump that enforces sanctions on the ICC.

Scheduled for Tuesday, February 11 at 3:00 PM CET, the press conference will be held in the Daphne Caruana Galizia room at the European Parliament in Strasbourg. Participants include Mounir Satouri, the Chair of the Subcommittee on Human Rights (DROI) from the Greens/EFA of France, Mama Bea from the NGO "Association des mamans Anti-Bwaki" (AMAB) which collaborates with the ICC Trust Fund for Victims in the DRC, and David Yambio, a Libyan victim of Almasri and the President and spokesperson for Refugees in Libya Association.

The event will offer interpretation services in English, French, German, Italian, Spanish, and Polish. Journalists with media accreditation can attend the conference in person. Those wishing to participate remotely can do so via Interactio, with the event being live-streamed and recorded on the Parliament's Multimedia Centre.

Contextually, on February 6, 2025, US President Donald Trump enacted an executive order enforcing sanctions on the International Criminal Court, affecting the travel rights of ICC officials and their families to the US. In response, members of the European Parliament's Subcommittee on Human Rights visited The Hague on October 29-30, 2024, for discussions with the International Court of Justice, the ICC, EUROJUST, and other significant entities. Following this visit, the DROI Chair expressed worry over the threats to these institutions, emphasizing the ICC's vital role in victim support and asserting that its decisions are obligatory for all EU member states.

In their 2023 annual report on global human rights and democracy, MEPs criticized efforts to undermine the ICC's work and legitimacy, urging the EU and its member states to motivate their partners to ratify the Rome Statute and its amendments, thereby broadening the Court's jurisdiction.

Media representatives can use Interactio to pose questions during the press conference by connecting via the provided link. Interactio is compatible with iPad (using Safari) and Mac/Windows (using Google Chrome). Users should enter their name and media organization in the designated fields and are advised to use headphones and a microphone for optimal sound quality. Video is required for interpretation. First-time users should connect 30 minutes prior to the event for a system check, with IT support available if needed. Upon connecting, open the chat window in the upper right corner to access service messages.

Contact Details:

Elodie LABORIE

Additional details

Details about the product

Distribute this page:

Updates

Legislature in your nation

Resources

Leader of the European Parliament

European Parliament

Parliament's social media presence

Reference links

Parliament has given the green light to a new tuna fishing pact with Cabo Verde. Under this revised agreement, 56 European Union ships will be permitted to catch tuna and similar species in the waters surrounding Cabo Verde over the next five years.

A fleet consisting of 24 freezer tuna seiners, 10 pole-and-line tuna boats, and 22 surface longliners, originating from Spain, France, and Portugal, has been granted permission to harvest up to 7,000 tonnes of tuna and associated species annually until 2029.

In return, the European Union is set to provide an annual financial support of €780,000, which includes €350,000 for permission to fish in the waters of Cabo Verde and €430,000 to enhance Cabo Verde's fisheries policy and its blue economy initiatives. Furthermore, the fees paid by the owners of fishing vessels could total nearly €600,000 each year.

The agreement seeks to boost collaboration between the European Union and Cabo Verde with the goal of fostering a sustainable approach to fisheries and encouraging socioeconomic growth in the region. This initiative is part of broader efforts to enhance fisheries regulation and combat illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing. The deal encompasses regulations aimed at improving the tracking of vessels, overseeing fishing permits, and implementing management strategies for shark populations.

Members of the European Parliament approved the new protocol with 507 votes supporting it, 76 opposing, and 16 choosing not to vote.

Statement from the reporting individual

This arrangement merges payment for fishing rights with assistance for the long-term growth of Cabo Verde's fishing industry, focusing on regulation and combating illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing practices. Additionally, it aims to improve working conditions and enhance scientific expertise in Cabo Verde. Rapporteur Paulo do Nascimento Cabral (EPP, PT) stated that this is a beneficial agreement that safeguards fishermen from both regions and ensures the preservation of our marine ecosystems.

Context

The deal establishes the legal structure allowing EU ships to catch highly migratory species like tuna and sharks in the waters of Cape Verde. This agreement is one of several the EU has with coastal nations in West Africa, including Morocco, Mauritania, and Guinea-Bissau.

The initial pact with Cabo Verde, established in 1990, was superseded in 2007 by the present agreement, which has been consistently updated every five years. The latest protocol executing this agreement has been temporarily in effect starting from July 23, 2024.

The text discusses the regulations surrounding the fishing of tuna and related species as established by the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT).

Contact Information:

Raquel Ramalho LOPES

Additional Details

Details about the Product

Distribute this Page:

Updates

National Parliaments

Resources

Leader of the European Parliament

European Legislative Body

Parliamentary Social Media

Useful Links

Lawmakers Request ECB Assessment of Global Conflicts on Price Stability

Share this page:

On Tuesday, the assembly passed recommendations to the European Central Bank following a discussion on its priorities and activities with President Christine Lagarde on Monday.

Mit 378 Ja-Stimmen, 233 Gegenstimmen und 26 Enthaltungen haben die Abgeordneten die Europäische Zentralbank dazu aufgefordert, ihre Anstrengungen zur Eindämmung der Inflation zu verstärken, da deren gravierendste Folgen besonders die sozial schwächsten Bevölkerungsgruppen treffen. Zudem sollen bei der Einführung eines digitalen Euros die Sorgen der Bürger berücksichtigt werden. Erstmals verlangt das Parlament von der EZB, ausdrücklich zu untersuchen, inwiefern Krieg und Konflikte die Stabilität der Preise beeinflussen können.

Bedenken hinsichtlich der Preissteigerung

Lawmakers remain concerned about the "persistently high level" of inflation, arguing that rising prices disproportionately affect those with lower incomes. They recall the "incorrect assessment by the ECB that the inflation spike would likely be temporary" and urge a continued review and improvement of economic forecasting models to learn from past crises. The parliament also criticizes the "significant aid to the banking sector" that indirectly results from ECB policies, leading to excessive interest payments on bank deposits at the ECB, and calls for measures to mitigate this issue.

Launch of the Digital Euro

Lawmakers assert that public trust is crucial for the successful rollout of the digital euro. They urge the European Central Bank (ECB) to highlight the advantages of the digital euro before lawmakers, rather than the ECB's governing council, decide on its implementation (Amendments 41 and 5). The lawmakers emphasize that the digital euro should complement cash and remain universally available and accessible at all times. They also stress the importance of addressing concerns about financial stability and potential structural changes in the financial sector that could arise from the introduction of the digital euro.

Aufruf zu einem erneuerten „geopolitischen Konzept“

For the first time, lawmakers are urging the European Central Bank to develop a geopolitical strategy for the period 2025-2030, aimed at gaining a clearer understanding of how wars and conflicts influence price stability.

The legislative body is calling for the European Central Bank (ECB) to assess the impact of climate change on its capacity to maintain stable prices. The resolution emphasizes that the ECB should employ all tools at its disposal to ensure that banks are fully addressing financial and external risks, including those related to climate and geopolitical issues.

The legislators emphasize that maintaining stable prices should continue to be the European Central Bank's primary objective, cautioning that overstepping this mandate could undermine the institution's independence.

Discussion with Christine Lagarde

During Monday's plenary session, lawmakers engaged in a heated debate over the extent to which the European Central Bank's (ECB) policies should remain market-neutral and how much emphasis should be placed on maintaining price stability. Some representatives contended that the ECB ought to prioritize the concerns of ordinary citizens more thoroughly. In contrast, others argued that the institution needs to be better equipped to handle geopolitical shocks in the current unpredictable global environment.

Contact Information:

John SCHRANZ

Armin WISDORFF

Philipp BAUER

Jakob FLOSSMANN

Additional Details

Reference

Share This Page:

Latest News

The EP in Your Country

Resources

The President of the European Parliament

European Parliament

The EP on Social Media

Informational Links

Keir Starmer has launched an attack on the £100m HS2 bat shelter – but does he have an alternative plan?

The £100m tunnel designed to safeguard bats in Buckinghamshire epitomizes the challenges the prime minister confronts in his mission to promote construction across Britain.

Assistant Political Editor @SamCoatesSky

Tuesday, February 11, 2025, 5:

Is Sir Keir Starmer entering a battle with a bat tunnel that he might ultimately find unwinnable?

Over the past half-year, the prime minister has consistently targeted Britain's most despised building project for critique — a one-kilometer, £100 million structure designed to shield bats in Buckinghamshire from the upcoming high-speed railway.

Sir Keir often declares that this symbolizes a failing planning system. His finance chief asserts that such incidents will not recur. Yet, can their combined political acumen steer them clear of upcoming obstacles?

In recent weeks, Downing Street has made multiple announcements demonstrating their commitment to overcoming obstacles to boost construction across the UK.

However, government officials admitted to Sky News that they have not yet disclosed a strategy to prevent the need for constructing such facilities again in the future.

HS2 is set to proceed with the construction of a bat tunnel, which is expected to be finished in 2027, regardless of circumstances. A proposed solution involving developers contributing to a unified fund managed by the government has received a lukewarm response from professionals and industry insiders, who believe it won't prevent the creation of additional bat tunnels.

The specialists are also expressing concerns about the government's ability to avoid future impractical and expensive constructions unless it revokes the environmental and wildlife regulations that were adopted from the EU.

Further Discussion on HS2

The First Minister of Wales anticipates an increase in railway funding from the UK government while criticizing the 'unjust' allocation of funds for HS2.

Officials remain uncertain about the total cost and completion date of the HS2 project.

HS2 chief discloses a £100 million cost for an unnecessary 'bat shed' on the railway project.

Associated Subjects:

Reversing these safeguards would not only ignite conflict with environmental advocates but also violate our trade deal with the EU, all in the effort to kickstart construction in Britain.

Despite the lack of a clear solution, government officials maintained on Monday that an answer is expected shortly.

Sky News today unveiled the first-ever images of the HS2 bat tunnel, highlighting the extensive and ambitious scope of the billion-pound project that stretches across the Buckinghamshire landscape. This comes despite the government-owned company denying our request for on-site access.

Navigating tree-lined routes and slogging along muddied communal trails, we managed to get close enough to the area adjacent to the structure, allowing us to capture detailed drone footage of the site without encroaching on HS2 property – and the view was truly impressive.

Located three miles northwest of Aylesbury, a striking disruption carves through the landscape, positioned between two industrial waste incinerators. From an aerial view, we reveal the vast, roofless frame of a kilometer-long structure designed to cover and safeguard railway tracks under construction in Buckinghamshire, while also serving as a protection for the local bat population.

Subscribe to our channel to stay updated on all the latest news

The goal is to prevent the Bechstein bat, a rare species residing in old-growth forests near the planned path, from colliding with upcoming high-speed trains operating between London and Birmingham.

The whole setup is designed to ensure HS2 adheres to "The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017." This regulatory framework, which safeguards endangered species, originates from the EU Habitats Directive and continues to be effective in the UK even after Brexit.

While it's commonly misconstrued as "no bat death is tolerable," Natural England did instruct HS2 that in order to adhere to the legislation, the firm must preserve the "favorable conservation status" of the 300 bats once the building work was finished. This was no simple task.

HS2 officials considered constructing a tunnel, using sound-based deterrents, and redirecting the route, all of which would decelerate the High Speed trains and increase costs significantly. They also explored erecting barriers next to the tracks or implementing a more flexible netting system above the tracks—however, none of these options could assuredly meet the legally mandated safety standards.

Their experts and advisors recommended that the most cost-effective and legally secure option was the construction of the current shed. Following four years of discussions with the municipal authorities, the building process started and is still ongoing.

Dan Tomlinson MP, the official leading the government's expansion initiative, emphasized the necessity of reform during his visit to the bat tunnel site with Sky News.

He explained to me, "It's crucial that we figure out how to lower the expenses associated with infrastructure here. We have to consider the protection of our wildlife as well. However, without addressing this issue, construction will halt, and the growth that this nation has been missing for a considerable time will remain stagnant."

Is there a way to prevent this going forward? The government maintains that solutions will be found in upcoming, yet-to-be-released legislative plans, and recently, they reaffirmed their commitment to their goals.

"A spokesman called the expenditure of huge amounts of money on constructing a 'bat tunnel' absurd."

"Regulations have long obstructed the construction of homes and infrastructure, stifling economic development and offering minimal benefits to the environment. To address this, we are rolling out new planning reforms and establishing a fund dedicated to restoring nature. These initiatives aim to facilitate the construction of homes and infrastructure while enhancing the condition of the natural environment. This approach promises dual benefits for both the economy and ecological health."

However, specialists suggest that a fund dedicated to restoring nature might not solve every problem.

Under the proposed scheme, the government suggests that developers at risk of violating environmental and wildlife regulations contribute financially to a collective fund. This fund would support broad-scale initiatives aimed at benefiting natural ecosystems, instead of addressing each individual infraction of the habitat guidelines.

Legal experts believe that establishing a fund is logical for collections of projects that impact the same species and environments. However, they point out that the primary complications occur when individual projects generate unique challenges, such as the situation with HS2 and its specific bat tunnel issue.

Catherine Howard of Herbert Smith Freehills law firm expressed that the idea of collectively gathering money for a significant compensation initiative that meets habitat regulation requirements for multiple onshore projects appears to be a complex task.

"Undoubtedly, devising and implementing any form of domestic strategic compensation will require considerable time, effort, and expense on the part of government or regulatory bodies."

"Is it possible to make decisions now based on the assurance that this compensation will be provided?"

If ministers find no appealing compromise, the sole alternative may be to repeal or weaken regulations concerning habitats and wildlife.

This action, nonetheless, could potentially lead the UK to violate several global agreements, such as the Trade and Cooperation Agreement, which was established between the UK and the European Union in April 2021 to oversee relations after Brexit and ensure fair competition.

The advocacy group Britain Remade has praised commitments to halt the construction of future bat tunnels. However, they warn that without amendments to existing EU laws on protected areas and species within the proposed planning bill, the outcome could be detrimental. They argue this would leave the UK in a difficult position where development is hindered and environmental conservation is inadequate, effectively maintaining a problematic status quo.

Learn more: Officials are uncertain about the total expenses and operational start date for HS2. MPs anticipate a pay increase above inflation, approaching £94,000.

Efforts to modify these regulations would be a dealbreaker for conservation activists. With 1.2 million members, the RSPB is raising concerns about the statements made by Sir Keir and Rachel Reeves.

CEO Beccy Speight conveyed to me that although some segments of the government are adopting a helpful stance, her organization is prepared to oppose any efforts to weaken environmental regulations.

Speaking to Sky News, she emphatically stated, "It's crucial that we do not diminish the environmental safeguards we currently have, as nature is severely depleted and it's imperative that we address this issue."

Time and again, Sir Keir has highlighted the elimination of nonsensical bat tunnels as a benchmark for his proposed planning reforms. This issue may turn out to be more challenging than initially expected.

Associated Subjects

Sky News Bottom Section

Information About Sky News

Services Provided by Sky News

Sky Television Networks

Additional Sky Websites

Keir Starmer has launched an attack on the £100m HS2 bat shelter – but does he have an alternative?

The £100m tunnel designed to safeguard bats in Buckinghamshire epitomizes the challenges the prime minister is encountering in his mission to stimulate construction across Britain.

Assistant Political Editor @SamCoatesSky

Tuesday, February 11, 2025, 05:

Is Sir Keir Starmer engaging in a battle with a bat tunnel that he will ultimately find unwinnable?

Over the past half-year, the Prime Minister has consistently targeted what is arguably the most despised building project in the UK—a £100 million, one-kilometer-long enclosure designed to shield bats in Buckinghamshire from the upcoming high-speed rail lines.

Sir Keir frequently asserts that this symbolizes a dysfunctional planning system. His finance minister claims that such incidents will not recur. However, the question remains whether their combined political insights are sufficiently refined to dodge upcoming obstacles.

In recent times, Downing Street has made multiple declarations showcasing their efforts to tackle the obstacles that hinder construction projects across the UK.

Government insiders admitted to Sky News that they have not yet presented a strategy to prevent the need for constructing similar facilities in the future.

HS2 is set to finish constructing a bat tunnel by 2027, regardless of circumstances. A proposed solution requiring developers to contribute to a unified fund managed by the government has failed to impress specialists and industry leaders, who argue it won't prevent the construction of additional bat tunnels.

Specialists are also expressing concerns about the government's ability to avoid future impractical and expensive constructions unless it revokes the environmental and wildlife regulations that were adopted from the EU.

Further Details on HS2

The First Minister of Wales anticipates an increase in rail funding from the UK government, criticizing the 'unequal' allocation for HS2.

Officials are unclear on the total cost and completion timeline for HS2

HS2 chief discloses a £100 million expense for an unnecessary 'bat shed' along the railway line.

Related Subjects:

Reversing these safeguards would not only ignite conflict with environmental advocates but also violate our trade commitments with the EU, all in an effort to stimulate construction in Britain.

Despite the lack of a clear solution, government officials maintained on Monday that an answer would be forthcoming shortly.

Today, Sky News has released unprecedented images of the HS2 bat tunnel, illustrating the extensive scope and magnitude of the billion-pound project stretching across the Buckinghamshire landscape. These images were obtained even though our request to access the site was denied by the government-run company.

Navigating through wooded areas and trekking along mucky trails, we managed to reach a clear area near the construction, allowing us to use a drone to capture detailed footage of the site without entering HS2 property – and it truly is a sight to behold.

Situated three miles northwest of Aylesbury, slicing through the landscape as if it were a deep gash, and nestled between two industrial waste incinerators, aerial views reveal the massive, roofless frame of a kilometer-long structure designed to cover and safeguard railway lines under construction in Buckinghamshire, while also serving as a protective measure for bats.

Subscribe to our channel to stay informed with the latest updates.

The objective is to prevent the Bechstein bat, a scarce species residing in the old forest next to the planned path, from colliding with the upcoming high-speed trains traveling between London and Birmingham.

The entire framework is designed to ensure compliance with "The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017." This legislation, which safeguards endangered species, originates from the EU Habitats Directive and continues to be effective in the UK, even after Brexit.

Despite common misinterpretations that it signifies "no bat death is permissible," Natural England did inform HS2 that to adhere to this regulation, it must ensure the "favorable conservation status" of the 300 bats is preserved following construction. This is no small task.

HS2 officials considered constructing a tunnel, using noise deterrents, and altering the route, which would reduce the trains' speed and increase costs significantly. They also explored installing barriers next to the tracks or a more flexible netting system above them. However, none of these options could ensure the legally mandated level of safety.

Their experts and advisors recommended that the most cost-effective and legally secure option was the construction of the shed currently underway. Following four years of discussions with the municipal council, the building process started and is still ongoing.

Dan Tomlinson MP, the government's advocate for economic expansion, emphasized the importance of change during his visit to the bat tunnel site with Sky News.

"We must explore strategies to lower infrastructure expenses here. Including safeguarding our wildlife. However, without this, construction halts and our nation's growth, which has been stagnant for quite some time, cannot resume," he explained to me.

Is there a way to prevent this going forward? The government maintains that solutions will be addressed in upcoming legislative plans that have not yet been released, and just yesterday, it reaffirmed its commitment to these goals.

"A spokesman described the expenditure of huge amounts on constructing a 'bat tunnel' as absurd."

"For decades, stringent regulatory measures have impeded the construction of housing and infrastructure, stifling economic progress and offering minimal benefits to the environment. To address this, we are rolling out new planning reforms and establishing a fund dedicated to nature restoration. These initiatives aim to facilitate the development of housing and infrastructure while enhancing the condition of the natural environment. This approach promises mutual benefits for both economic development and ecological health."

Experts suggest that a fund dedicated to restoring nature might not solve every problem.

Under the proposed scheme, the government suggests that developers at risk of violating environmental and wildlife regulations contribute financially to a collective fund. This fund would support broader, strategic initiatives aimed at benefiting nature, instead of addressing each individual instance where habitat rules might be breached.

Legal experts believe that creating a financial pool is practical for collections of initiatives that impact the same types of wildlife and ecosystems. However, they note that the real challenges occur when individual projects cause unique problems, such as HS2 and its specific impact on bat populations through the construction of a bat tunnel.

Catherine Howard of Herbert Smith Freehills law firm expressed that the idea of amassing capital for a significant compensation initiative, one that meets habitat regulation criteria for various onshore projects, appears to be a daunting task.

"Undoubtedly, the development and implementation of domestic strategic compensation by government bodies or regulators will require considerable time, effort, and expense."

"Is it possible to make interim decisions based on the assurance that such compensation will be provided?"

If ministers find no middle-ground solution appealing, the only remaining option would be to repeal or weaken the regulations on habitats and nature.

This action could potentially place the UK in violation of several global agreements, such as the Trade and Cooperation Agreement that was signed with the European Union in April 2021 to manage relations after Brexit and ensure fair competition.

The advocacy group Britain Remade commends the commitments to halt future bat tunnel projects, but warns that without modifications to existing EU laws on protected areas and species in the proposed planning bill, the outcome could be detrimental. They argue that this would leave us in a bind, unable to build and yet also ineffective at preserving rural environments.

Learn more: Authorities are unclear on the total expense and operational timeline for the HS2 project. Parliament members are poised for a pay increase above the inflation rate, bringing their salaries close to £94,000.

Efforts to modify these regulations would be a dealbreaker for conservation activists. The RSPB, with its 1.2 million members, is already raising concerns about the statements made by Sir Keir and Rachel Reeves.

CEO Beccy Speight explained that although certain sections of the government are adopting a "constructive" stance, her organization is prepared to oppose any efforts to dilute environmental legislation.

She emphatically stated to Sky News, "It's crucial that we do not diminish any of the existing safeguards for the environment, as it is currently in a dire state and requires urgent action."

Sir Keir has repeatedly set the elimination of absurd bat tunnels as the benchmark for his planning reforms. This issue may turn out to be more challenging than initially expected.

Associated Subjects

Footer of Sky News

Information About Sky News

Services Offered by Sky News

Channels on Sky

Additional Sky Websites

Lawmaker Behind Assisted Dying Legislation Advocates for Revised Approval Process

In proposed amendments to a bill, specialized panels might replace High Court judges in granting final approval for assisted dying petitions.

Tuesday, February 11, 2025, at 5

For an optimal video playback experience, it is recommended to use the Chrome browser

The Member of Parliament behind the assisted dying legislation has advocated for eliminating the requirement for High Court judge approval in such cases.

Labour MP Kim Leadbeater plans to introduce changes to the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, which received support from MPs in November. These amendments would establish a panel of multidisciplinary experts authorized to review cases and approve assisted dying requests.

She informed Sky News that the approval process would be overseen by a three-person panel led by "a distinguished legal authority, possibly a retired judge or a King's Counsel," accompanied by a psychiatrist and a social worker, who together would evaluate mental competence and potential coercion.

Ms. Leadbeater conceded that she believed the appointment of a High Court judge to grant final approval, as outlined in her initial proposal, "would be effective."

She also stated, "Based on the testimony we gathered in the bill committee and during all evidence sessions, there were other experts who suggested that we could indeed enhance this.

"Therefore, the proposal includes the establishment of a commission for assisted dying, led by either a current or former High Court judge. This ensures judicial oversight while the actual decision-making would be carried out by panels of experts."

The lawmaker stated her desire for an additional "third layer of scrutiny" during the process, noting that "this is not common in other areas; it's rather unique."

Further Discussion on Assisted Dying

Physicians should have the option to decline endorsing assisted dying, as per statements to MPs

Debate surrounding euthanasia

The expense associated with assisted dying may reach several tens of thousands of pounds for each individual.

Associated Subjects:

It is recommended to utilize the Chrome browser for an enhanced video player experience.

This week, her proposed change is anticipated to be introduced as a group of MPs, who are both supporters and opponents of assisted dying, began examining the bill in detail.

Over 60 Members of Parliament supported the legislation during its second reading, citing the involvement of a High Court judge as their reason, while an additional 20 highlighted the judicial protections included in the bill.

Sources have informed Sky News that numerous Members of Parliament, who initially supported the legislation during its second reading, intend to oppose it when it comes up for its third reading.

Ms. Leadbeater characterized the revised proposal as a "judge plus" system, asserting that it fortifies protections against undue influence or manipulation by allocating a more significant role to professionals like psychiatrists and social workers.

Critics of assisted dying argue that protections have been diminished, with Conservative ex-minister Danny Kruger labeling the amendment "a disgrace."

On Sky News, Conservative shadow crime minister Matt Vickers expressed "huge concerns" regarding safeguarding as the primary reason assisted dying remains illegal. However, he noted that proponents of the bill have assured that all necessary safeguards are already established.

He further stated, "This was one of the key selling points used to advance and successfully pass this proposal through the House of Commons.

"Currently, it appears they are modifying some of the previously established protections and controls. These were designed to be infallible. They must be foolproof to ensure the safety of at-risk senior citizens."

Stay ahead with the latest Breaking News

Download the Sky News application at no cost

Labour Member of Parliament Diane Abbott criticized the bill as "hastily prepared and poorly conceived law" that "must be rejected," whereas ex-Liberal Democrat chief Tim Farron commented that "the few protections that were in place are being removed."

The plan is set for a review by a group of Members of Parliament, who will start examining the bill in detail starting Tuesday. Nonetheless, the new change concerning High Court judges isn't anticipated to be addressed on the initial day.

The group, chosen by Ms. Leadbeater, holds a 14-9 majority supporting assisted dying following the vote in November.

For an optimal video experience, it is recommended to utilize the Chrome browser.

'Other specialists have a part to contribute'

During a Monday afternoon segment on Sky's Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge, Ms. Leadbeater was questioned on the necessity of appointing a High Court judge in every instance.

"She believes that additional specialists should be involved," she stated, referencing the expert testimony that lawmakers have been considering regarding the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill.

"The testimony highlighted the importance of employing a multidisciplinary strategy. This is an aspect I am thinking about very carefully."

"She emphasized the significance of legal oversight but also suggested that integrating a multidisciplinary approach could greatly improve the bill," she added.

Discover further details on Sky News:Bar in Parliament resumes service following allegations of drink spikingFarage suggests Labour MPs are becoming anxious

The suggested changes include establishing a Voluntary Assisted Dying Commission, which would be responsible for reviewing all requests. This commission would be led by a High Court judge or a distinguished retired judge.

Cases are to be reviewed by multi-disciplinary panels with the authority to give approval.

Subscribe to our channel to stay updated with all the latest news.

The committee is responsible for making sure individuals are able to decide freely, without any force or manipulation.

The legislation mandates that two separate physicians provide evaluations for every individual seeking approval for euthanasia.

In January, Mencap, a charity focused on learning disabilities, expressed concerns that conversations about assisted dying could potentially coerce individuals into making decisions against their will.

Associated Subjects

Footer of Sky News

Information on Sky News

Services Provided by Sky News

Sky Television Networks

Additional Sky Websites

Fifty years since Margaret Thatcher ascended as the leader of the Conservatives, her influence persists. Sir Keir Starmer has referenced her, and she was idolized by Kemi Badenoch – yet both current leaders aspire to match the electoral successes once achieved by the Iron Lady.

Senior political reporter @joncraig

Tuesday, February 11, 2025, at 03

Half a century later, she continues to be cherished and esteemed by Conservatives, albeit reluctantly admired by current and past Labour leaders, while remaining scorned and denounced by the left and numerous working-class areas.

This week marks the 50th anniversary of Margaret Thatcher's rise to leadership of the Conservative Party, a pivotal moment that reshaped political trajectories as she secured three consecutive general election victories in the UK and emerged as a prominent global leader.

At the age of 49, she ascended to leadership following a surprising victory over former Prime Minister Edward Heath, winning the initial ballot on February 4 with a vote count of 130 to 119. Subsequently, she secured her position by defeating William Whitelaw 146 to 79 in a second ballot held a week later.

Back then, the selection of the Conservative Party leader was in the hands of its MPs. Charles Moore, who penned the biography of Mrs. Thatcher, disclosed that upon learning of her decision to run, her husband Denis grimly commented, "Heath will murder you."

In a 1973 television interview, while serving as the education secretary under Mr. Heath and facing criticism for ending free school milk—earning her the nickname "Milk Snatcher"—she stated, "I don't think there will be a woman prime minister in my lifetime."

Yet, despite the ironic nickname, she received strong support from a prominent faction of Conservative MPs referred to as the "Milk Street mafia." This group was headed by the contentious entrepreneur and chairman of the 1922 Committee, Edward du Cann, whom the satirical magazine Private Eye dubbed "du Cann of Worms."

Following her win, Mrs. Thatcher named Mr. Whitelaw, a seasoned Conservative strategist and Scottish aristocrat, as her deputy leader.

—

Latest in Politics

Investigation underway into possible leak of bleak economic predictions

The Treasury has initiated an investigation into the disclosure of economic growth projections

Review concludes that the murderer of MP Sir David Amess was removed from the Prevent program 'too swiftly'.

He remained a faithful aide to her until 1988, when a stroke ended his service. However, her well-known remark, "Every prime minister needs a Willie," has entered the annals of political legend.

When Margaret Thatcher assumed the role of opposition leader on February 11, 1975, the sitting Prime Minister from the Labour Party was Harold Wilson. By this time, Wilson had achieved victory in four general elections. He would resign from his position the following year, paving the way for James Callaghan to succeed him.

Stay current: Real-time political news updates

Margaret Thatcher achieved significant wins in general elections against James Callaghan, Michael Foot, and Neil Kinnock. However, in 1990, it wasn’t the opposition Labour Party that removed her from her position at 10 Downing Street, but rather a rebellion within her own Conservative Party, including cabinet members and backbench MPs.

Fifty years since she first took charge, the Conservative Party has welcomed another woman as its leader, while the Labour Party, now headed by a prime minister who achieved a remarkable win in the general election, is seeing its government's popularity decline quickly.

However, similarities between 1975 and 2025 cease at that point. Based on what we've seen, detractors might argue that Kemi Badenoch lacks Margaret Thatcher's distinct qualities, and Sir Keir Starmer does not mirror Harold Wilson.

Upon assuming leadership, Margaret Thatcher transformed Conservative ideology, introducing groundbreaking strategies as Prime Minister in 1979, including the sale of council houses, widespread privatization, and stringent measures against trade unions.

Her approach, characterized by reduced government spending and lower taxes, was dubbed "Thatcherism". She described her philosophy as "rolling back the frontiers of the state".

During a challenging period in 1980, as unemployment surged and she faced pressure to reverse her policies, she addressed her detractors at the Conservative conference with a firm response: "You turn if you want to. The lady's not for turning."

However, her tenure was marked by two particularly significant events: triumph in the Falklands War in 1982 and her management of the harsh miners' strike from 1984 to 1985, which continues to stir intense anger and resentment in former mining areas to this day.

Overseas, she discovered a kindred spirit in US President Ronald Reagan, enhancing the already unique alliance as they battled against communism. The Russians had previously christened her as the "Iron Lady."

The moniker was enduring, and she embraced it fully. Her resilience implies that Donald Trump would likely have held her in high esteem and formed a strong connection with her if she were the Prime Minister currently.

She described herself as someone who thrived on just four hours of sleep each night and disliked taking vacations. During a celebration of the 50th anniversary last week, her ex-secretary, Alison Wakeham, mentioned, "She always hoped for a phone call about a global emergency."

In 2020, Kemi Badenoch praised Margaret Thatcher as an "inspirational" figure, crediting her with revitalizing a faltering nation by adhering to what she termed "the politics of conviction."

She briefly encountered her "political idol" when she posed for a photo with Lady Thatcher while running as the Conservative candidate against Labour’s Tessa Jowell in Dulwich and West Norwood in 2010.

Stay updated with political developments: Lawmakers anticipate pay increases surpassing inflation rates. Parliamentary pub to resume operations following drink tampering claims. Farage predicts anxiety among 100 Labour representatives.

Despite facing critiques for a perceived sluggish beginning in her initial 100 days, there is speculation among some Conservatives about whether Ms. Badenoch might emerge as the next Margaret Thatcher. Her firm stances, opposition to politically correct culture, and straightforward manner have indeed endeared her to the right-wing faction of the Tory party and its supporters.

According to Charles Moore, one significant contrast between the two is that Mrs Thatcher did not confront a substantial threat from the right, unlike Mrs Badenoch who has to contend with Reform UK. Mr Moore explains that Mrs Thatcher's primary battle was against the left.

Her influence extends beyond the Conservative Party. In 2007, Labour Prime Minister Gordon Brown invited her to 10 Downing Street for afternoon tea and ordered a portrait of her, which was revealed when she returned to No. 10 two years later.

"Mr. Brown expressed his admiration for her principled approach to politics," he said prior to her 2007 visit. "I share her commitment to acting on conviction."

In 2022, Sir Keir Starmer faced backlash from Conservative MPs for relocating a portrait from a room nicknamed the Thatcher Room, even though he had acknowledged her significant impact on the UK as a nod to Conservative voters in 2023.

Just two weeks ago, Sir Keir referenced Mrs. Thatcher when he committed to slicing through the dense bureaucracies that hinder economic expansion, asserting that this was akin to the deregulatory efforts of her administration in the 1980s.

Sir Keir and Mrs. T share a notable similarity: both have hired a voice coach. Recently, Sir Keir may have had second thoughts about this decision during the controversy involving Leonie Mellinger's visit amid lockdown restrictions.

In the 1970s, Gordon Reece, the public relations head for Mrs. Thatcher, employed a voice coach who had previously worked with Laurence Olivier.

In contrast to Mrs. Thatcher, Harold Wilson, whom Sir Keir has identified as his most admired Labour leader of the last half-century, did not govern based on firm personal convictions.

He was a cunning – some would argue deceitful – and manipulative master of political strategy and party control. He also harbored deep suspicions of conspiracies aimed at him.

"He famously declared, 'I know what's happening—I'm what's happening.'" In his biography titled "Harold Wilson: The Winner," Labour minister Nick Thomas-Symonds lauds his government's accomplishments in areas like the abolition of the death penalty, gay rights, abortion rights, censorship, and lowering the voting age, portraying him as "one of the great political figures of the 20th century."

Mr. Wilson fostered a persona as an everyman, often seen with a pipe and known for his sharp humor. He was depicted in Private Eye’s “Mrs. Wilson’s Diary,” a humorous column about his wife Mary. His public image included his dog Paddy, a preference for brown sauce, and a bungalow in the Scilly Isles. However, behind closed doors, he enjoyed brandy and cigars.

Is Sir Keir emulating Harold Wilson? The soccer-loving Prime Minister prominently backed Gareth Southgate's England team during last year's Euro final.

In 1966, Mr. Wilson humorously remarked following Alf Ramsey's team's victory: "Did you ever realize that we only clinch the World Cup when a Labour government is in power?"

In contrast to Mr. Wilson's dynamic music hall approach, Sir Keir comes across as rather stiff.

He's relatively new to politics, having served as an MP since 2015, in contrast to Mr. Wilson, who was a minister in Clement Attlee's government and a prominent member of the Labour Party for almost twenty years before becoming Prime Minister.

However, there's more to it.

In a recent publication by political correspondents Gabriel Pogrund and Patrick Maguire, it is revealed that Sir Keir's chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, criticized him for acting "more like an HR manager than a leader," while his deputy, Angela Rayner, humorously remarked on his lack of competence by saying he couldn't even manage to run a bath.

Recent polling data from Sky News and YouGov shows Nigel Farage's Reform UK surpassing Labour, casting doubt on Sir Keir Starmer's capacity to secure a victory in the upcoming election, especially compared to Harold Wilson's four successful campaigns.

Kemi Badenoch may face an even grimmer future.

In a recent YouGov poll, the Conservatives were ranked third. Additionally, on the Sky News podcast "Electoral Dysfunction" hosted by Beth Rigby, ex-leader of the Scottish Conservatives Ruth Davidson hinted that her tenure might last less than 18 months.

The unfortunate update for Kemi and Keir is that half a century since Margaret Thatcher's rise to leadership of the Conservatives, her impressive track record of electoral victories, along with that of Harold Wilson, the Labour Prime Minister at the time, seems unbeatable.

Sky News Footer

Learn About Sky News

Services Provided by Sky News

Channels Under Sky

Additional Sky Websites

UK requires a 'calm and rational' approach to Trump's tariffs on British steel, according to a government official. Donald Trump declared on Monday evening that he will apply significant tariffs on imported steel and aluminium, 'without any exceptions or exemptions'.

Political correspondent @alixculbertson

Tuesday, February 11, 2025, 2:

The UK must react with calm and clarity to Donald Trump's decision to implement a 25% tariff on British steel exports, according to the trade minister.

The U.S. president declared significant tariffs on imported steel and aluminum late Monday, stating they will be applied "without exceptions or exemptions."

UK Steel claimed that the tariffs would severely harm their industry and criticized Mr. Trump for drastically undermining free trade, which would have significant consequences for the steel industry both in the UK and globally.

Trade Minister Douglas Alexander called for the industry to respond with calm and rationality, instead of hastily reacting.

Latest in Politics: Supporters of Assisted Dying Express Concerns Over Bill's Potential Failure

Addressing Parliament on Tuesday, he stated that the UK is "prepared" to explore solutions beneficial to both nations.

He mentioned that the U.S. has only released information regarding steel tariffs, leaving out details on aluminum tariffs.

—

Politics Update

Latest in Politics: Inquiry into Possible Disclosure of Harsh Economic Predictions

—

Review reveals murderer of MP Sir David Amess was prematurely removed from Prevent program

Starmer Criticizes Judge's Decision to Allow Gaza Family to Resettle in UK Via Ukraine Program

Mr. Alexander stated that within the next 24 hours, the Business Secretary, Jonathan Reynolds, is scheduled to hold discussions with representatives from the steel industry and trade unions. He added that historically, the United Kingdom has enjoyed a robust and equitable trading relationship with the United States, valued at approximately £300 million.

The Member of Parliament, who holds a position as a minister in the Cabinet Office, stated that it was "appropriate and sensible to be aware" of President Trump's remarks and to "conduct an evaluation."

The U.S. president "specializes in creating unpredictability – it's a component of his negotiating technique," he further stated.

For an enhanced video experience, we recommend using the Chrome browser.

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is planning a trip to Washington DC soon to engage in discussions with Mr. Trump, although specific details have not been finalized.

Downing Street refrained from commenting on whether Mr. Trump's decision to impose tariffs was incorrect, stating that the government will adopt a thoughtful strategy and will discuss the specifics with the United States.

A spokesperson declined to comment on whether the UK had requested that Mr. Trump exempt Britain from the tariffs, nor would they disclose if there were plans to implement subsidies for British Steel.

He stated, "Substantial backing has already been extended to the UK steel sector, with a £2.5 billion investment. Furthermore, we are introducing a British industry supercharger that will reduce electricity expenses for steel companies, aligning their prices with those of global competitors."

Explore further: Lawmaker supports assisted dying legislation, addresses concernsTax issues for farmers' inheritances lead to significant repercussions

The United States ranks as the second biggest market for UK steel exports, following the European Union, though the government noted that in 2023, these exports to the US represented just 5% of the UK's total steel exports.

Mr. Trump stated that the tariffs were necessary to safeguard the American steel industry and national security.

UK Steel Director-General Gareth Stace commented, "President Trump has drastically disrupted free trade, which has significant implications for the steel industry both in the UK and globally."

This will not only obstruct British exports to the United States, but it will also significantly disrupt global trade patterns, increasing the import burden on our domestic market.

Stay ahead with the latest Breaking News

Download the Sky News application at no cost

UK-produced steel does not compromise US national security. The superior quality of our steel supports essential American industries that often lack local alternatives for sourcing these materials.

"Now is the time for our nations to collaborate in addressing the worldwide excess of steel production instead of being in conflict."

Sky News Information

Details about Sky News

Services Offered by Sky News

Various Sky Networks

Additional Sky Websites

Sue Gray joins the House of Lords, gaining a fresh title

Sir Keir Starmer’s former chief of staff stepped down last October due to internal conflicts at 10 Downing Street.

Political journalist @alexrogerssky

Tuesday, February 11, 2025, 4:

For an enhanced viewing experience, it is recommended to use the Chrome browser to

Sue Gray, previously the chief of staff for Sir Keir Starmer, has officially joined the House of Lords following her nomination for a peerage by the Prime Minister.

Ms. Gray will henceforth be titled Baroness Gray of Tottenham, indicative of her birthplace in North London, and she will serve as a Labour peer in the upper house.

The ex-government employee, who left their position at Downing Street last October following approximately three months on the job, was proposed for a lifetime peerage by the prime minister in December.

She stepped down from her role as Chief Advisor to Sir Keir following internal conflicts within the leadership at Number 10.

Morgan McSweeney, the architect behind Labour's overwhelming election victory and the party's previous campaign director, has taken over her position.

Latest in Politics: UK Eager to Collaborate with Trump on Steel Tariffs

Ms. Gray gained national attention for her role in writing the report on gatherings at Downing Street during the health crisis.

Further Details on Keir Starmer

From Legal Expert to Assertive Keir

King Charles has extended an invitation to Sir Keir Starmer and the leaders of the devolved administrations for a dinner at Windsor Castle.

Sir Keir Starmer undergoes HIV testing as part of a campaign to lessen negative perceptions.

Associated Subjects:

Her transition to the Labour Party garnered significant media attention initially, as the Conservatives questioned the extent of her interactions with the party regarding a senior position while she was still employed as a civil servant.

However, her departure from the chief of staff position stemmed from internal disputes, as Labour's initial three months in power were overshadowed by adverse media coverage concerning her.

Subscribe to our channel to stay updated with all the latest news

The controversy surrounding Ms. Gray's role intensified after it was revealed that her salary was £170,000, which is £3,000 higher than that of the prime minister. This information was disclosed to the BBC in what seemed to be a deliberate effort to undermine her politically.

At the time, it was also noted that party employees who were unhappy about not receiving higher salaries than they did while Labour was in opposition blamed her.

Ms. Gray was absent from Labour's inaugural conference while in government, as the prime minister faced criticism for accepting over £100,000 in gifts during his tenure as Labour leader, which included football match tickets, concert passes, and high-end apparel.

Baroness Gray ultimately declined the position of the prime minister's representative for the nations and regions after she failed to attend the initial major summit pertinent to her proposed new responsibilities.

In her departure note from last October, Ms. Gray stated that although she was honored to have served as chief of staff, it had become evident that the "heavy scrutiny surrounding my role might overshadow the government's crucial agenda for reform."

"That's why I've decided to step down, and I'm eager to keep supporting the prime minister in my new capacity," she continued.

Discover further: Close associates reveal insights into Morgan McSweeney – the Prime Minister's latest key advisor. Exploring how Thatcher’s influence persists, half a century since her ascent as Conservative leader.

Ms. Gray is one of 30 individuals recently named to Labour peerages, an announcement made before Christmas aimed at correcting the party's "imbalance" in the House of Lords.

The Conservative Party put forward six candidates, while the Liberal Democrats nominated two.

Ms. Gray donned the customary red robes as she took her place in the appointed House of Lords. During the brief induction ceremony in the senior house, she pledged her loyalty to the King.

She received backing from ex-Whitehall head and independent crossbencher Lord O'Donnell, along with her Labour colleague Baroness Harman.

Her child, Labour MP Liam Conlon, observed the proceedings from the public gallery in the House of Lords.

Associated Subjects

Sky News Bottom Section

Information about Sky News

Services Provided by Sky News

Sky Television Networks

Additional Sky Websites