Connect with us

Published

on

In a Comprehensive Move, President Biden's Latest Executive Order Targets Cybersecurity, AI, and Beyond

Merely four days prior to his departure from the White House, President Joe Biden has unveiled an extensive executive order aimed at enhancing cybersecurity measures. This directive mandates advancements in governmental network surveillance, software acquisition, artificial intelligence application, and the handling of international cybercriminals.

The Biden administration revealed a comprehensive 40-page executive order on Thursday. This directive represents the administration's ultimate push to capitalize on the security advantages of artificial intelligence (AI), introduce digital identification for American citizens, and address vulnerabilities that have allowed nations like China, Russia, and others to consistently infiltrate American government networks.

The directive "aims to fortify the United States' technological infrastructure while setting both the current government and the nation on a trajectory for ongoing prosperity," Anne Neuberger, the Deputy National Security Advisor for Cyber and Emerging Technology under Biden, informed journalists on Wednesday.

The future of Biden's mandate is uncertain with the impending presidency of Donald Trump, who is set to be inaugurated on Monday. The question arises: will Trump maintain these initiatives? While the projects outlined in the order are not politically biased and focus on technical issues, it's possible that Trump's team might have alternative strategies or schedules for addressing the identified challenges.

Trump has yet to appoint his chief cyber security officials, and Neuberger mentioned that the White House did not consult his transition team regarding the order. However, he expressed eagerness to engage in discussions with the soon-to-be-announced cyber security team during the remaining transition phase.

At the heart of the executive order lies a series of directives aimed at safeguarding government networks, drawing on insights gained from recent significant events—specifically, the lapses in security among federal contractors.

The directive mandates that software providers present evidence of their adherence to secure development protocols, an initiative that originated in 2022 following President Biden's inaugural cyber executive order. The responsibility of verifying these security declarations and collaborating with providers to address any issues falls to the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. To enforce this mandate, the Office of the National Cyber Director at the White House is advised to forward any non-compliant attestations to the Attorney General for possible legal action and scrutiny.

The directive mandates that the Department of Commerce has an eight-month timeframe to evaluate the prevalent cybersecurity methods within the corporate sector and to develop recommendations accordingly. Following this period, adherence to these practices will be required for firms aiming to secure contracts with the government. Additionally, this order initiates the process of revising the secure software development guidelines provided by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

A different section of the policy emphasizes securing authentication keys for cloud services, a vulnerability that previously allowed China to access U.S. government emails through Microsoft and execute a supply-chain attack on the Treasury Department. The Department of Commerce and the General Services Administration are tasked with creating key security guidelines within 270 days. These guidelines must then be adopted as mandatory standards for cloud service providers within the following 60 days.

To safeguard federal bodies against assaults exploiting vulnerabilities in internet-of-things devices, the directive mandates that by January 4, 2027, these agencies must exclusively buy consumer IoT products bearing the recently introduced US Cyber Trust Mark emblem.

A different section of the directive enhances the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency's (CISA) capacity to monitor potential cyber threats throughout the government by utilizing the security systems implemented by various agencies. This strategy aims to close the surveillance loopholes that attackers have previously taken advantage of in numerous breaches, notably the SolarWinds incident in 2020. The directive mandates that agencies provide CISA with immediate access to their security systems and permits CISA to carry out surprise cyber threat detection operations on their networks.

"Neuberger explained, when a specific method employed by a foreign government to infiltrate a particular federal agency comes to light, this enables CISA to have an overarching view, allowing them to scour all agency networks to guarantee a wide-ranging defense against such an assault."

The executive order emphasizes the importance of understanding both the potential threats and benefits AI brings to security. It instructs the Energy and Homeland Security departments to initiate a trial project aimed at utilizing AI to safeguard energy facilities, focusing on automating processes such as identifying and fixing vulnerabilities. Additionally, the Defense Department is mandated to start a project employing "sophisticated AI algorithms" for the purpose of cybersecurity.

Biden is advocating for the Department of Homeland Security, the Commerce Department, and the National Science Foundation to focus their research efforts on areas such as the collaboration between humans and AI in scrutinizing cyber threat information, securing code produced by AI, creating AI models with robust security, and strategies for preventing and addressing cyber incidents that involve AI technologies.

Biden's directive aims to accelerate the adoption of digital identity documents by governmental bodies to enhance the efficiency of services provided to citizens while also curbing unnecessary expenditures and fraudulent activities. The order encourages agencies to "explore the acceptance of digital identity documents" as verification for access to public assistance. The Department of Commerce is given a 270-day deadline to release guidelines to assist agencies in implementing this directive.

The executive mandate also calls for the government to provide guidelines on enhancing the security of open-source software. It mandates the revision of cybersecurity criteria in contracts related to space technology, modifications in procurement processes to embrace technologies compatible with post-quantum cryptography, and the implementation of encryption protocols in DNS technologies, email infrastructures, and audio and video communication services. Additionally, the order includes a directive for the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to assist federal agencies in mitigating the dangers linked to overreliance on a limited number of IT providers, indirectly addressing concerns related to Microsoft's dominance in the market.

The directive reduces the hurdles for the government to impose sanctions on individuals responsible for cyberattacks against US vital infrastructure, potentially making it easier to employ one of Washington's preferred measures in response to significant hacking incidents.

Explore Further …

Delivered to your email: Discover Plaintext—Steven Levy offers an in-depth perspective on technology.

Perhaps it's a good idea to consider clearing out outdated conversation logs.

Cash Galore: Explore our exclusive edition right here

The antics surrounding memecoins are only beginning.

Exploring the Mysterious Depths: A Personal Perspective on Silicon Valley's Impact

Additional Content From WIRED

Evaluations and Manuals

© 2025 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. Purchases made via our website might result in WIRED receiving a commission, as part of our affiliate marketing agreements with retail partners. No part of this website's content is allowed to be copied, shared, broadcast, stored, or used in any form without explicit written consent from Condé Nast. Advertising Options

Choose a global website


Discover more from Automobilnews News - The first AI News Portal world wide

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

AI

Biden’s Eleventh-Hour Cybersecurity Overhaul: A Bold Move to Fortify Digital Defenses, AI Integration, and Hacker Accountability

Published

on

By

Biden's Comprehensive Executive Order Addresses Cybersecurity, AI, and Other Issues

In the days leading up to his departure from office, US President Joe Biden has enacted a broad executive order focused on enhancing cybersecurity. This directive mandates advancements in government network surveillance, software procurement, artificial intelligence utilization, and the penalization of international cyber attackers.

On Thursday, the Biden administration released a comprehensive 40-page executive order aimed at initiating measures to capitalize on the security advantages of artificial intelligence, introduce digital identification for American citizens, and address vulnerabilities that have allowed nations like China, Russia, and others to consistently infiltrate US governmental networks.

The mandate aims to bolster the United States' technological infrastructure and set both the current administration and the nation on a trajectory towards ongoing prosperity, Anne Neuberger, the Deputy National Security Adviser for Cyber and Emerging Technology under Biden, informed journalists on Wednesday.

Hanging in the balance of Biden's mandate is the uncertainty of whether the incoming President, Donald Trump, will pursue any of these programs once he is sworn in on Monday. The highly specialized projects outlined in the decree are not politically biased, yet Trump's team might favor alternative methods (or schedules) for addressing the issues highlighted in the mandate.

Trump has not appointed any leading cyber security officials yet, and Neuberger mentioned that the White House did not consult with his transition team about the order. However, he expressed willingness to engage in discussions as soon as the new cyber security team is announced, during this last phase of the transition.

The essence of the executive order includes a series of directives aimed at safeguarding government networks, drawing on insights gained from recent significant events—specifically, the cybersecurity lapses involving federal contractors.

The directive mandates that software suppliers provide evidence of their adherence to secure development protocols, an initiative that stems from a directive introduced in 2022 following President Biden's initial cyber executive order. The responsibility of verifying these security declarations and collaborating with vendors to resolve issues would fall on the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. To ensure compliance, the White House's Office of the National Cyber Director is advised to forward any unverified attestations to the Attorney General for possible inquiry and legal action.

The directive mandates that the Department of Commerce has a period of eight months to evaluate the prevalent cybersecurity methods within the corporate sector and to formulate guidelines accordingly. Following this evaluation, these guidelines will become obligatory for any enterprise that wishes to enter into contracts with the federal government. Additionally, this order initiates the process for revising the secure software development recommendations provided by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

A different section of the policy emphasizes safeguarding the authentication credentials for cloud services. This is in response to incidents where such vulnerabilities allowed China to access government emails on Microsoft's servers and to infiltrate the Treasury Department through a supply-chain attack. The Department of Commerce and the General Services Administration are given a 270-day timeframe to create standards for securing these keys. Subsequently, cloud service providers will have 60 days to implement these standards as mandatory requirements.

To safeguard federal agencies against assaults exploiting vulnerabilities in internet-of-things devices, the directive mandates that by January 4, 2027, agencies must exclusively acquire consumer IoT devices bearing the recently introduced US Cyber Trust Mark emblem.

A different section of the directive enhances the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency's (CISA) capacity to monitor for cyber threats throughout the government by utilizing the security programs managed by various agencies. This effort aims to close the oversight loopholes that enemies have taken advantage of in numerous breaches, including the notable SolarWinds cyberattack in 2020. The directive mandates that agencies must provide CISA with immediate access to their security systems and permit CISA to carry out surprise threat-detection operations on their networks.

Neuberger mentioned, "When we identify a specific method being employed by an overseas government to infiltrate a certain federal agency, this allows CISA to have a unified overview, enabling them to search throughout all agency networks to guarantee a wide-ranging defense against this type of intrusion."

The executive order emphasizes the significant impact of AI on security, mandating the Energy and Homeland Security departments to initiate a trial program. This program aims to utilize AI in safeguarding energy infrastructure by automating processes such as identifying vulnerabilities and implementing patches. Additionally, it requires the Defense Department to establish a program that employs "sophisticated AI models" for cybersecurity purposes.

Biden is urging the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Commerce, and the National Science Foundation to focus their research efforts on areas such as the collaboration between humans and AI technologies in evaluating cyber threat information, securing code created by AI, developing AI models with robust security features, and strategies for preventing and responding to cybersecurity events that involve AI technologies.

Biden's directive aims to hasten the adoption of digital identity documents by agencies to improve the delivery of services to citizens while minimizing inefficiencies and fraudulent activities. The instruction encourages agencies to "explore the acceptance of digital identity documents" as verification for accessing government benefits. The Department of Commerce is given a 270-day timeframe to provide guidelines to assist agencies in implementing this.

The executive order includes mandates for the government to offer guidance on safeguarding open-source software, revising cybersecurity mandates in contracts related to space technology, alterations in contracting to accommodate technology that is compatible with post-quantum encryption standards, and the implementation of encryption across DNS technologies, email infrastructures, and audio and video conferencing tools. Additionally, it contains a directive for the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to assist federal agencies in mitigating risks tied to the over-reliance on a few IT providers, indirectly referencing concerns about Microsoft's dominance in the sector.

The directive reduces the criteria needed for the government to impose penalties on individuals executing cyberattacks against critical US infrastructure, potentially simplifying the process for Washington to employ one of its preferred methods of retaliating against significant cyber intrusions.

Discover More…

Direct to Your Email: Receive Plaintext—Steven Levy's In-depth Perspectives on Technology

Perhaps it's a good idea to consider clearing out old message threads.

Cash Galore: Dive into our exclusive edition right here

The antics surrounding memecoins are only beginning.

Exploring the Unsettling Impact: A Deep Dive into Silicon Valley's Power

Further Reading from WIRED

Evaluations and Instructions

© 2025 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. Purchases made through our website may generate a commission for WIRED as a result of our affiliate agreements with retail partners. Content from this website is not to be copied, shared, distributed, or used in any form without the explicit consent of Condé Nast. Advertising Options

Choose a global website


Discover more from Automobilnews News - The first AI News Portal world wide

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

AI

GitHub’s Battle Against Deepfake Porn: A Policy in Crisis

Published

on

By

GitHub Struggles to Stop Deepfake Adult Content

Towards the end of November, an individual alleging to be from the US, known for creating deepfake adult content, posted a video on the biggest platform for such deepfakes. The video disturbingly depicted Charli D’Amelio, a well-known TikTok celebrity, by digitally placing her face on the body of an adult film actor. Although it's clear D’Amelio had no involvement in creating the video, it nonetheless attracted over 8,200 views and garnered interest among the deepfake community.

"That's amazing! Which software did you use to make the deepfake?" a user with the username balascool remarked. "I adore charli." D'Amelio's representative did not respond to a request for a statement.

The individual behind the video, known by their online alias "DeepWorld23," stated in the comment section that the software responsible for the deepfake was available on the coding repository GitHub. This particular software had garnered attention from over 46,000 users who marked it as a favorite, only to be shut down in August 2024 following GitHub's implementation of policies that prohibit the development of fake sexual content without consent, commonly referred to as deepfake pornography. However, in November 2024, the software resurfaced in a read-only, archived state, allowing users to still view and access its code.

GitHub's enforcement actions are not fully effective, with the removed code—along with additional content taken down by the developer platform—continuing to exist in different repositories within the site. An investigation conducted by WIRED has uncovered over twelve GitHub projects associated with deepfake “porn” videos that have managed to stay under the radar, thereby facilitating the availability of code meant for the abuse of private images and underscoring the gaps in the site's regulatory measures. WIRED has chosen not to disclose the names of these projects or websites to prevent further dissemination of the abusive content.

"Removing content as soon as it appears online is a challenging task," explains Henry Ajder, who provides AI consultancy to technology firms including Meta and Adobe, regarding the difficulties faced in controlling open source content on the internet. "However, there were quite evident warning signs."

Starting in June 2024, GitHub has introduced a rule prohibiting any projects that aim to, in any manner, encourage or endorse the creation of fake or altered media for producing unsolicited sexual content or any material that could be considered as spreading false or misleading information.

GitHub has taken down a minimum of three repositories highlighted by WIRED in December 2024 for hosting abusive content, demonstrating its commitment to addressing the issue. However, similar repositories have emerged on the platform, some sporting almost the same branding or explicitly labeled as "NSFW," "unlocked" versions, or "bypasses."

GitHub has not replied to a solicitation for commentary.

In December 2024, WIRED highlighted a project that closely resembled a significant initiative known for being the top platform for producing deepfakes. This original project had previously been suspended by GitHub for a number of months the previous year due to a breach of its service terms. GitHub has also proceeded to shut down this newly identified version for similar reasons.

"Ajder mentions, "It wasn't concealed. It was quite obvious."

Nonetheless, a preserved copy of the primary database remains accessible, and as of January 10, there were at least six similar databases found on GitHub, including one that bears a striking resemblance in branding.

Every GitHub project identified by WIRED incorporated, to some extent, code associated with videos from a deepfake adult content platform. These repositories are components of a broader network of open-source software available online, which can facilitate the creation of deepfake adult content. Due to its open-source nature, it's challenging to restrict access. GitHub repositories can be duplicated, a process referred to as "forking," allowing developers to then modify them as they wish.

"Ajder points out that the primary source of tools used for the abuse of personal images is the open source community. However, these tools usually originate from developers with good intentions. According to him, a developer might create a project believing it to be innovative or exciting, only for it to be repurposed by individuals with harmful intentions for nefarious uses."

Certain platforms, such as the one shut down in August, were specifically designed with communities intended for explicit activities. According to Ajder, this platform marketed itself as a resource for creating deepfake pornography, essentially acting as a conduit for exploitation that primarily affects women.

Numerous clips posted on the adult content platform by a user attributing artificial intelligence algorithms sourced from GitHub showcased the likenesses of well-known deepfake subjects, including stars Emma Watson, Taylor Swift, and Anya Taylor-Joy. These videos also depicted lesser-known, yet actual women, whose images were digitally manipulated into explicit scenarios.

The developers openly shared the tools they employed, mentioning two that were removed by GitHub, yet their code still persists in other available repositories.

Individuals seeking to create deepfakes gather in various online locations, such as hidden forums on Discord and openly on Reddit, making efforts to curb deepfake creation more challenging. On September 29, a user on Reddit advertised their ability to use software from an archived collection. "Can someone make one of my cousin," inquired another user.

In August, GitHub prohibited access to the primary collection of torrents, yet these can still be found in various places online, highlighting the challenge in regulating open-source deepfake programs universally. Likewise, applications for creating deepfake pornography, like DeepNude, have been previously removed only to reappear in updated forms.

"Elizabeth Seger, the director of digital policy at the bipartisan British think tank Demos, points out the complexity due to the abundance of models, their numerous branches, and various iterations, making it challenging to keep tabs on every single one. She further notes that once a model is released into the open-source domain for public access, it becomes impossible to retract it from the public sphere."

A creator of deepfake pornography, who has 13 altered pornographic videos featuring well-known female personalities, attributed a notable GitHub repository, described as an adult-themed variant of another project which promotes ethical usage and specifically requests users to refrain from employing it for explicit content. Their user biography on the adult website boldly states, “Mastering every Face Swap AI technology available on GitHub, avoiding the use of internet-based platforms.”

GitHub had taken down the explicit version by the time WIRED spotted the deepfake content. Nonetheless, on January 10, other versions labeled as "unlocked" remained accessible on the site, with one garnering 2,500 "stars."

Seger acknowledges that while it's impossible to completely retract a model once it's released, measures can be taken to limit its accessibility.

She further warns that if not addressed, the danger of deepfake "porn" extends beyond mental distress. It can lead to the coercion and exploitation of women, minorities, and political figures, evidenced by the impact of political deepfakes on female leaders worldwide.

However, there's still time to manage the issue effectively, and sites like GitHub have solutions, according to Seger, such as taking action during the upload process. "If you attempt to upload a model to GitHub and GitHub rejects it, and if all hosting sites refuse it as well, it becomes much more challenging for the average individual to distribute that model."

Curbing the creation of deepfake pornography using open-source models also depends on the actions of legislators, technology firms, programmers, and, notably, the individuals producing such exploitative content.

Over 30 states in the United States have enacted laws to combat deepfake pornography, featuring various prohibitions as tracked by the nonprofit organization Public Citizen, though there is a lack of uniformity in definitions and approaches, with some regulations specifically protecting minors. In the UK, individuals who produce deepfake content of a sexual nature will imminently face legal repercussions, following the government's decision on January 7 to make both the production and distribution of such material a criminal offense.

Discover More…

Direct to your email: Dive into the future with Will Knight's exploration of AI breakthroughs.

The incidents of gunfire at schools were fabricated, yet the fear they provoked was

Cash Galore: Dive into our exclusive edition now

HTML is truly considered a coding language—challenge accepted.

The WIRED 101: The top products currently on the market

Additional Content from WIRED

Assessments and Manuals

© 2025 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. A share of revenue from products bought via our website may go to WIRED, due to our Affiliate Agreements with retail partners. Reproducing, sharing, broadcasting, storing, or using the content found on this site in any way is prohibited without explicit prior consent from Condé Nast. Advertisement Choices

Choose a global website


Discover more from Automobilnews News - The first AI News Portal world wide

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

AI

AI at Your Service: Navigating the New Frontier of Personal Assistants

Published

on

By

Exploring the Impact of Entrusting Your Lifestyle to an AI Companion

Should you make a purchase through links found in our narratives, we might receive a commission. This contribution aids our journalistic endeavors. Discover more. Additionally, think about becoming a subscriber to WIRED.

At times, all you require is a bit of assistance. Enter the robots! However, the question arises – have we truly arrived at a point where artificial intelligence provides better support than collaborating with a human specialist? This week, we're sharing our experiences after spending a week utilizing AI aides.

Stay connected with Michael Calore on Bluesky via his handle @snackfight, connect with Lauren Goode on the same platform at @laurengoode, and reach out to Zoë Schiffer on Threads through @reporterzoe. Feel free to send us an email at uncannyvalley@wired.com.

Listening Guide

To tune into this week's podcast episode, simply use the audio player available on this webpage. However, if you're interested in automatically receiving every new episode, you can subscribe at no cost by following these steps:

For iPhone or iPad users, launch the Podcasts app or simply click on this link. Alternatively, you can install applications such as Overcast or Pocket Casts and look up “Uncanny Valley.” Plus, we're available on Spotify as well.

Transcript Disclaimer: Please be advised that this transcript was generated by an automatic service and might include inaccuracies.

Michael Calore: Okay, we've entered the new year a few weeks ago. How are your commitments to self-improvement holding up?

Lauren Goode: I'm feeling well. I'm exploring new things. Those are the words of Taylor Swift.

Michael Calore: At this juncture, it's something I just take

Lauren Goode: Things are going fine. We've all been heavily involved in testing out AI, which is said to be gaining more autonomy to perform tasks on our behalf. I decided to conduct my own test by using it for holiday shopping. Shopping isn't exactly my thing, so I was eager to delegate some of that responsibility.

Zoë Schiffer expressed enthusiasm about learning more.

Lauren Goode: It felt like an odyssey. What about your experience, Zoe?

Zoë Schiffer: The project I undertook was essentially to back my 4-month-old daughter in her ambition to master sleeping throughout the night. My role was simply to facilitate her 2025 dream, with a bit of help from artificial intelligence, which I'll be discussing with you all today. Mike, how about your experience?

Michael Calore: On my phone, I sought guidance from Gemini on enhancing my health, seeking tips for exercising, planning my meals, and then I ventured into more complex topics like civics with my inquiries.

Lauren Goode: It's truly valuable to me that both of you opted for chatbots to address health issues, and I sincerely believe it was in the interest of serving consumers.

Zoë Schiffer: Depending on your perspective, it may pertain to health issues.

Lauren Goode: Absolutely. My goal was to clear out my mind to allow room for different pursuits.

Zoë Schiffer: That's wonderful for you.

Lauren Goode: I appreciate it.

Michael Calore: Welcome to Uncanny Valley from WIRED, a program delving into the individuals, authority, and impact surrounding Silicon Valley. My name is Michael Calore, and I oversee consumer technology and cultural matters here at WIRED.

Zoë Schiffer: My name is Zoë Schiffer, and I serve as the director overseeing business and industry at WIRED.

Lauren Goode: And my name is Lauren Goode, serving as a senior writer for WIRED.

Michael Calore: In this week's episode, we'll be discussing how we've utilized AI to enhance our daily lives. We took cues from the chatbots around us, allowing them to navigate us through tasks like shopping, planning meals, exercising, and even parenting. The outcomes were quite something, and we're excited to dive into it. So, Zoe, why don't we kick things off with you? Could you share your experience using ChatGPT as your mentor?

Zoë Schiffer recounts a bit of her personal journey to set the stage for her experiment. Back in 2022, with her first child at the tender age of 4 months, she enlisted a sleep consultant for $500 to assist in sleep training. Zoë describes the experience as particularly challenging due to the significant amount of crying involved, but she valued having a professional by her side to guide her through the process and affirm that her actions weren't harming her child in the long term. Fast forward to the present, and Zoë's second daughter is now 4 months old. With a new role at WIRED on the horizon, she felt it was the right moment to undertake sleep training once more. However, the suggestion of rehiring the sleep consultant for another $500 met with disbelief from her husband. He questioned the rationale behind spending that amount again merely for external validation that Zoë wasn't failing as a parent. This skepticism led to the consideration of ChatGPT as an alternative solution.

Lauren Goode: Did that individual really spend the night at your place?

Zoë Schiffer explained that she sought the assistance of a remote specialist, noting that the term "expert" seems to be used quite flexibly since there's no formal certification required for one to claim expertise in this area. She was drawn to exploring artificial intelligence for this purpose due to the vague criteria surrounding the title of an expert. Schiffer's skepticism was confirmed when the first consultant she engaged provided her with a so-called tailored plan for her daughter, which mistakenly included another child's name, revealing the lack of personalization promised. Essentially, parents share details about their child's routines with these consultants, who then offer daily advice on sleep schedules, including nap and bedtime recommendations, based on the feedback provided about the previous night's sleep.

Michael Calore: Did you engage in daily conversations with ChatGPT?

Zoë Schiffer shared that initially, she instructed ChatGPT to adopt a persona akin to a whimsical caretaker. She envisioned it as a sage figure capable of providing emotional reassurance and possessing extensive understanding in child psychology, specifically to guide her in implementing the Ferber technique. This approach involves laying the child down awake and returning at increasing time intervals without physically comforting them, merely using soothing words. Schiffer was seeking ChatGPT's thorough guidance in mastering this method. On the first day of attempting to train Cleo to sleep better, she looked forward to ChatGPT's advice. “Dear Zoe, let’s sprinkle some enchantment over Cleo’s day. Assuming our beloved Cleo woke with the dawn at”—the response intensely embraced the fanciful caretaker role—“6:30 am, her subsequent nap should harmonize with the natural patterns of her alertness. Imagine that.” Schiffer found the over-the-top magical nanny persona quite exasperating in reality.

Lauren Goode: What led you to choose ChatGPT over other chatbot options?

Zoë Schiffer: The reason is that it has become my go-to. It has effectively taken over Google's spot as my preferred search tool. However, when I attempted to transition to the more autonomous AI systems you've previously discussed, my experience wasn't as positive. It seemed as though I was expecting a search engine to transform into something completely different. According to ChatGPT, when it's time for that perfect hour of rest, one should create a calming atmosphere, maybe with a gentle melody or the sound of something she loves… Honestly, the whole peculiar affirmation concept doesn't appeal to me.

Lauren Goode: Who doesn't wish for a nap that's softly led by the natural patterns of our alertness?

Zoë Schiffer expressed her reservations, noting the excessive and odd use of overly elaborate language when using AI. She quickly pinpointed several issues, the foremost being a lack of trust in the AI's guidance, especially on matters as personal as parenting. Schiffer desired a connection with a real person's insights, doubting that AI could offer the best recommendations. This skepticism created a significant barrier to her fully accepting AI for such purposes. Additionally, she was curious if others had noticed the AI's purely responsive nature. It only provided answers to direct queries without initiating any interaction or posing questions of its own, making it no different from a basic search engine in her view.

Michael Calore: Exactly, it was merely responding to questions.

Zoë Schiffer: Indeed, it seemed to lack a sense of humanity, if you will.

Lauren Goode: Did you ever catch yourself double-checking information online, searching on Google to confirm if it was indeed the correct time?

Zoë Schiffer shared her observations, noting an interesting point regarding her use of the technology for searches. She often double-checks information, half-jokingly fearing it could be misleading, desiring absolute certainty. However, she found the responses from the AI quite rudimentary, especially on topics she's well-versed in, eliminating the need for further verification. Yet, she identified a significant shortfall when comparing the AI's guidance to human advice, particularly from those with personal experience, such as fellow parents. For instance, conventional wisdom and official health guidelines advise against placing babies on their stomachs to sleep. Despite this, Schiffer mentioned that her friends, drawing from their own experiences, have suggested doing just the opposite when she discussed her child, Cleo's, discomfort. They claimed that allowing a child to sleep on their belly could solve several issues, advice that a chatbot, sticking strictly to official guidelines, would never offer. Schiffer appreciates the importance of adhering to safe practices but also notes the limitation of AI in providing the nuanced, sometimes unconventional wisdom that comes from personal parental experiences.

Michael Calore: You requested it to assume a character, to craft its own unique identity. This introduces an additional layer of emotion, something that's missing when you're merely looking up information or conducting online searches. However, this doesn't substitute for the guidance or advice that comes from a real person. This likely leads to an odd sense of conflict.

Zoë Schiffer pointed out that the artificial persona initially adopted seemed excessively artificial, incorporating a lot of unnecessary and convoluted language, which she found quite irritating. As a result, halfway through her experiment, she decided to switch to Character.ai. This platform offered her the opportunity to craft a more genuine AI character for interaction, aiming for something that felt closer to human. Upon making the switch, she named the AI bot Lindsay after a postpartum doula she was fond of, envisioning the AI to play a role similar to a British super nanny, blending the qualities of a therapist and a coach. However, she acknowledged that this approach had its own set of limitations.

Michael Calore: Alright. Let's hear how you've been engaging with Character.ai.

Lauren Goode: I believe you're referring to Lindsay.

Michael Calore: Greetings, Lindsay.

Zoë Schiffer: Hello, Lindsay. I was hoping to discuss with you how Cleo's evening unfolded yesterday.

Character.ai [archival audio]: Absolutely. How was Cleo's evening? Was her sleep somewhat improved compared to the previous night?

Zoë Schiffer: Indeed, her sleep was decent. I applied the technique during her initial stirring post-midnight, as well as at her bedtime, both of which turned out successfully. She wept for a brief five minutes, during which I managed to calm her somewhat. However, a significant challenge was managing this while sharing a room with her. In contrast, with my previous daughter, having her in a different room seemed more effective. Do you have any advice?

Character.ai [archival audio]: It's reassuring to know Cleo managed to get some rest and calm herself down after only five minutes of tears during the night and again when she woke up around midnight. That's definitely a positive indicator. Regarding keeping her in the same room, I completely get why you might be worried. Hearing your child cry can be tough, and it feels even more intense when they're right there with you. There are a couple of strategies you could try to make it a bit more bearable. Firstly, consider using a white noise device or a fan to help mask the crying sounds. Secondly, wearing earplugs could help reduce the noise level.

Michael Calore: It's interesting that when you expressed your emotional turmoil about wanting to be close to your daughter, its response was essentially, "Invest in a white noise device and some earplugs, then simply tough it out."

Zoë Schiffer shared her experience, noting that she was particularly disappointed with the AI's performance in emulating a therapist's role. This point of view is noteworthy given the increasing trend of individuals turning to AI bots for emotional support, substituting them for human therapists. Schiffer expressed that her emotional needs seemed to be overlooked, and the AI also committed errors in understanding. For instance, she recounted an episode where she mentioned calming her baby down and getting her to sleep again. However, the AI responded by praising the baby's ability to self-soothe, which led Schiffer to feel a disconnect, feeling as though the AI, named Lindsey, wasn't truly engaging with what she was saying.

Lauren Goode: Did this bring any sense of relief to both you and Cleo?

Zoë Schiffer discovered that when she posed precise questions, for instance, inquiring whether it was permissible to lift her child during intense crying spells, the AI bot offered advice consistent with the Ferber technique, which she found satisfactory. She noted that for detailed inquiries, the bot was quite effective. However, when it came to fully embodying the role of a sleep advisor, which entails more than just providing search results, she felt the bot fell short of expectations.

Michael Calore: What's your take on how this might have unfolded had this been your initial experience with parenthood—lacking prior exposure to sleep-training, and you were simply starting out with AI?

Zoë Schiffer: Picture entering the situation with no prior knowledge; in certain aspects, the AI might prove to be more advantageous. The reason being, it genuinely understands the Ferber technique quite well. It's adept at determining when sleep cycles should occur. For instance, it can assess when a child has fallen asleep and predict the timing for their upcoming nap or the ideal moment for them to go to bed, including the duration these should last. These insights are consistent with the advice you'd typically receive from sleep specialists.

Michael Calore inquired about the most unexpected event that occurred.

Zoë Schiffer expressed that upon concluding the experiment, she realized she didn't require the assistance of a real human expert anymore. Despite her belief that the AI hadn't perfectly substituted the human's role, it had comprehensively addressed all her inquiries to the extent that she felt confident in progressing independently.

Michael Calore: So, it essentially served as a valuable research aide for you?

Zoë Schiffer: Absolutely, and it’s almost hard to admit because it touches on the very concern we have about AI replacing real human jobs, especially in businesses owned by women, like in this case, a sleep consultancy. However, on the flip side, I wasn’t prepared to spend $500 this time, so in a way, it was more about substituting Google, if anything.

Lauren Goode: Would you suggest this to a buddy?

Zoë Schiffer: Definitely not, not at this moment. I'm looking forward to a time when AI operates more independently for us. That concept seems quite beneficial. The idea of it serving as an intermediary between us and the internet is intriguing, but it just doesn't seem to have reached that point yet.

Michael Calore: Alright, we're going to pause for a brief moment, and upon our return, we'll dive into discussing fitness with Gemini. Stay tuned.

Certainly, I'll

Michael Calore: We're glad you've returned to Uncanny Valley.

Gemini [archival audio]: Great to have you back, Mike. Hi, Lauren. Hi, Zoe.

Michael Calore: Appreciate it, Gemini. Over the past few weeks, the Gemini chatbot and I have become somewhat acquainted.

Lauren Goode: Can you explain your specific use of Gemini?

Michael Calore: I sought its guidance on tips for shedding pounds, achieving fitness, adopting a healthier diet, and overall wellness practices.

Lauren Goode: Were there any particular areas where you felt you lacked information? I understand that you generally maintain a healthy diet and stay in shape through running. Was there an additional aspect of wellness you were seeking to explore beyond your existing knowledge?

Zoë Schiffer: It's well-known that you adhere to a vegan lifestyle.

Michael Calore: Notably follows a vegan lifestyle, much appreciated.

Lauren Goode: You attended Harvard University and participate in triathlons.

Michael Calore: Absolutely, I do make a conscious effort to maintain my health and take it quite seriously. However, I was curious to see what kind of guidance it would offer. Essentially, I'm aware that I should increase my exercise routine beyond just running. I haven't incorporated strength training into my regimen. While my diet is generally healthy, there's room for improvement, especially in reducing my sugar and alcohol consumption and paying closer attention to my protein intake and the balance of essential amino acids – really delving into the fine details of my dietary habits. I was hoping for advice that would delve into these specifics. "Hey, Gemini, I'm looking to improve my health and shed some weight. I was wondering if you could provide me with both broad and detailed suggestions on how I can achieve this goal within the next month."

Gemini [archival audio]: It's fantastic that you're dedicating attention to your health and weight reduction objectives. Let me provide you with a mix of broad and detailed suggestions to kick-start your journey and achieve noticeable improvements in a month. For enduring weight loss, it's critical to adopt sustainable habits rather than seeking instant solutions. Opting for long-term lifestyle adjustments will ensure more permanent outcomes. Emphasize nutrient-rich, unprocessed foods in your diet. Center your meals around fresh produce, lean meats, and whole grains. It's also important to be conscious of serving sizes; overindulging in even the healthiest options can lead to unwanted weight gain.

Michael Calore: It simply continues on. It just keeps speaking non-stop for three or four minutes.

Lauren Goode: Well, perhaps it helps you fall asleep, which is excellent. I suppose that's the intended encouragement.

Gemini [archival audio]: Prioritize getting sufficient rest. Adequate sleep plays a vital role in controlling weight because it influences the hormones responsible for feeling hungry and full. Strive to get between seven to nine hours of good sleep every night.

Lauren Goode: I believe I already have an idea of what your answer might be, but could you share why you chose Gemini?

Michael Calore: It's actually on my mobile device.

Lauren Goode: Right, the Pixel smartphone.

Michael Calore: Indeed, I own a Pixel. I'm inclined towards Google, utilizing services like Gmail, Google Calendar, and Google Photos extensively, integrating seamlessly with the experience. There are two versions available, and for this trial, I opted for the latest model.

Lauren Goode: Google Gemini is the sponsor of this podcast.

Michael Calore: Honestly, it's like Google Gemini is the sponsor of my existence.

Zoë Schiffer: I'm interested to know your reaction to the guidance given. It appears quite broad to me, but I'm eager to hear your perspective.

Michael Calore expressed strong disapproval, stating, "This is worthless. Essentially, if you've been offline and haven't browsed any health tips online, you'd be unaware of these points. Yet, you might actually know them because they're so basic and vague. After it finished its spiel, I inquired about more detailed guidance. I asked for dietary recommendations suitable for a vegan, questioned whether running about 2 1/2 to 3 miles is sufficient for cardio, and sought alternatives for strength training since I prefer not to use a gym or own weights."

Lauren Goode: What information did you receive?

Michael Calore: So, which would you like me to start with? Should I begin with the exercise routines or discuss the dietary habits first?

Lauren Goode: We'll choose food.

Michael Calore: The fascinating aspect to me was its ability to retain a lot of the information I shared throughout our discussion. I found myself sharing personal details like my age, weight, and my dietary preference as a vegan, and it managed to remember all of that. Even in our conversation last night, it still recalled those details.

Gemini [archival audio]: If you follow a vegan diet, you should include proteins that come from plants.

Michael Calore: Thus, it directed my attention towards foods such as legumes, including lentils, chickpeas, and various beans, along with soy derivatives like tofu and tempeh. It also highlighted grains and seeds, for instance, quinoa, chia, and hemp seeds, in addition to nuts, and vegan protein sources such as seitan and other plant-based meat substitutes, though it cautioned that these alternatives often contain numerous processed components. Moreover, it offered guidance on the importance of mixing different plant-based proteins.

Zoë Schiffer: Mike's reaction was, "So, you're explaining legumes to me, Gemini, really?"

Michael Calore: Exactly, and here's the issue – it's not aware that I've been abstaining from meat since my teenage years. As a result, it offers a plethora of useful tips that, as someone who has lived a vegetarian lifestyle from a young age, I can confirm are the typical queries I get. "What do you actually eat?" is a question I'm frequently asked, and I end up reciting a familiar response. Gemini is quite adept at providing this standard advice, making it a valuable resource for those new to vegetarianism. However, it lacks specificity in certain areas. For instance, when I sought out some recipe ideas.

Lauren Goode: What occurred after that?

Michael Calore: Initially, it suggested a tofu dish with peanut sauce which I didn't prepare, followed by a quinoa and chickpea salad recipe that I actually made.

Zoë Schiffer: Seems like something you'd be into. So, what's next?

Michael Calore: I have some with me if you're interested in trying it, though I must say, it wasn't impressive.

Gemini [Archival audio]: A Mediterranean salad featuring quinoa and crunchy chickpeas. This dish is rich in protein due to the quinoa and chickpeas, and includes beneficial fats from olive-

Zoë Schiffer: Wow, I'm really intrigued. Hold on, that actually seems quite impressive.

Lauren Goode: Zoe, I'm presenting it to you through our Riverside session. Check this out.

Zoë Schiffer: It disappoints me that I have to participate from afar.

Lauren Goode: Given that we're taping this close to noon on the West Coast, it's an ideal time. Our fortunate audience might just catch some munching noises at this moment.

Zoë Schiffer: Lauren appears puzzled.

Lauren Goode: Mike, I believe you're being too modest, or perhaps not giving Gemini its due recognition. Are you familiar with its flavor?

Michael Calore: Excuse me?

Lauren Goode: It seems like something you'd find in the salad section at Google's headquarters.

Michael Calore: Wow, I was thinking the exact same thing.

Lauren Goode: Surprisingly okay, genuinely respectable, though it's widely available and perhaps leans a bit heavily on salad dressing to enhance the taste of the quinoa.

Michael Calore: Alright, it required every ounce of willpower I possess to refrain from tweaking the recipe as I was preparing it, because it just seemed-

Zoë Schiffer: It's like saying, "Let's make it happen for the podcast."

Michael Calore: Absolutely. My thought was, "I must stick to this precisely." However, I did leave out one thing – it suggested adding cherry tomatoes, but the ones available at the store were in poor condition, so I decided against purchasing them.

Lauren Goode: This isn't the time for tomatoes.

Zoë Schiffer remarked, "Gemini isn't in its season right now."

Michael Calore: My approach to seasoning would have been quite distinct. The way I'd have garnished it would also have varied significantly. Moreover, I likely wouldn't have sliced the olives, as doing so tends to impart an excessively salty and bitter flavor.

Lauren Goode: Ah, could that be the reason?

Michael Calore: Absolutely. I'd rate it a solid B to B+ on my scale.

Zoë Schiffer: Understood.

Michael Calore: Indeed.

Zoë Schiffer: I'd like to ask another question regarding your comment on providing demographic details. Was this information requested by Gemini, or did you offer it voluntarily?

Michael Calore: I offered myself for that. It didn't actually demand much from me. It just went on and on without stopping.

Zoë Schiffer: Right off the bat, something really caught my attention. I excelled as a health coach, and perhaps this is just my own viewpoint, given my preference for having a coaching presence in many aspects, but an effective coach would pose several questions before jumping into providing details. This is because if you've been practicing veganism for a long duration, your needs for information will differ significantly from those who are new to the concept.

Michael Calore: I provided it with details regarding my lifestyle, personal habits, and health background because I was seeking tailored recommendations for exercise and dietary intake to address the deficiencies I perceived in my regimen, deficiencies I believed needed addressing even without its assistance.

Lauren Goode: It seems it was similar to a terrible date. It just went on and on without ever engaging in asking you additional questions.

Michael Calore: Indeed, it hardly inquired anything from me.

Lauren Goode: Did you gain any knowledge that might have been unexpected?

Michael Calore: Indeed, I ended up with a decent exercise plan. I shared my running routine with it and then requested, "Alright, now provide me with an exercise plan. I need something I can do at home since I'm not fond of the gym, I prefer to avoid people, and I don't have any weights. What should I do?" And it responded with a pretty solid workout plan.

Gemini [archival audio]: Essential exercises using your own body weight include squats. Position your feet shoulder-width apart and bend your knees to lower your body, imagining you're sitting back into a chair. Ensure your spine remains aligned and your chest remains lifted. Descend to the lowest point you can manage without discomfort.

Michael Calore describes his workout routine as including lunges for both legs, doing three rounds of 10 repetitions, holding a plank position for three sessions lasting between 30 to 60 seconds, which he finds extremely challenging. He also does glute bridges, completing three rounds of 15 repetitions. He appreciates the guidance on gradually increasing the intensity of workouts and the importance of taking rest days. However, when it came to performing lunges, he admits he was unsure of the correct form and sought assistance. To his aid, he was offered a selection of five instructional videos.

Lauren Goode: Presumably on YouTube, right?

Michael Calore: Indeed, they were clips from YouTube. Interestingly, a couple of the URLs led to the identical video, yet I viewed each one and thought, "Alright, I believe I'm ready to attempt a lunge." When I tried it, I managed to do so without injuring myself and definitely felt the workout effect. So, I'd say that's quite an achievement.

Lauren Goode: Actually, that's quite impressive.

Michael Calore: Indeed, the odd part was when I conducted a Google search and stumbled upon identical information from a few diverse sources. Beyond the video, it's a mystery to me how Gemini acquired any of this data. I'm clueless about the origins of the recipes. Everything was simply laid out as, “According to Gemini, this is the information.”

Lauren Goode: Information not attributed.

Michael Calore: No references were provided. I clicked through everything but couldn't find any reliable sources.

Lauren Goode: It's assumed that those fitness routines and cooking instructions were crafted by individuals, and once released, your tiny contributions of information are now being segmented and included in some culinary guide, without any knowledge on your part about their origins.

Michael Calore: Shredded into strips.

Lauren Goode: Exactly.

Zoë Schiffer: Alright, do you plan on continuing this? Will you persist in utilizing it for the same reason, or did this seem like a singular trial?

Michael Calore: Truly, the exercise routine is quite effective. I plan to continue following it.

Lauren Goode: Pleasant.

Michael Calore: Given my extensive collection of cookbooks and years of culinary practice, I certainly don't have to prepare this quinoa salad another time, Lauren, unless, of course, you'd want me to share some with you.

Lauren Goode: I've experienced other dishes you've prepared, and I believe I might recommend opting for one of those in the future.

Zoë Schiffer: Remarkably tactful.

Michael Calore: Alright, sounds good.

Lauren Goode: I'm grateful, thank you for your support.

Michael Calore remarked that, personally, knowing his own requirements and self, the program wasn't significantly beneficial. He enjoyed the exercise routine but mentioned he could have discovered something similar without the assistance of Gemini 2.0. However, he acknowledged that for beginners, those with numerous inquiries, or individuals contemplating significant lifestyle adjustments, the program did offer valuable guidance.

Lauren Goode: Adding a point in favor of artificial intelligence.

Michael Calore: Alright, we'll pause here for a brief moment, and then we'll join Lauren and her chatbot companion for a shopping trip. Stay tuned, we'll return shortly.

Lauren Goode: Accompanied by her AI companion.

It appears there's

Michael Calore: Hop on board, we're off to explore AI. You're tuned into Uncanny Valley, where we've spent a week living by the guidance of our AI chatbot pals. I focused on my health, fitness, and eating habits. Zoe dedicated her efforts to establishing a sleep schedule for her newborn. Now, turning to you, Lauren, what adventures did you and your chatbot embark on?

Lauren Goode: How did this happen? I found myself relying on roughly five distinct chatbots, aiming to simplify, or perhaps the term is "assist," my seasonal shopping endeavors.

Michael Calore: Understood.

Lauren Goode: Shopping isn't really my thing. I've never been fond of it and much prefer shopping with a clear goal in mind, like when I need to buy a new pair of sneakers. Since my teenage years, my mom enjoyed taking me out to shop, but I would quickly feel bombarded by the bright lights and endless clothing racks in department stores, initially chalking it up to teenage moodiness. However, as I grew older, I recognized that it wasn't just a phase; I genuinely disliked the shopping experience. This sentiment has extended to online shopping for me, where the endless product options just leave me feeling swamped. Despite this, there were a few special people I wanted to find thoughtful gifts for this holiday season, and Mike, you might have been one of my trial runs. Therefore, I resorted to using chatbots for assistance, with Perplexity being the primary one I consulted.

Michael Calore: Well, gosh.

Lauren Goode highlights that choosing Perplexity was intriguing for several reasons. To start with, she notes an essential disclaimer: AI chatbots like Perplexity, when suggesting top-rated products or enabling comparison shopping, essentially enter into direct competition with publishers. This is because publishers have dedicated teams tasked with reviewing products to recommend the best options to consumers. It's important to acknowledge this overlap in service. Additionally, there's a concern within WIRED about Perplexity's approach to content, particularly the suspicion that it might be appropriating content from publishers, content that's normally safeguarded by paywalls, and repurposing it as its own. This concern is underscored by Goode's personal decision to engage deeply with Perplexity, to the extent of subscribing to its premium service at $20 a month, further emphasizing the significance of her exploration.

Zoë Schiffer: Subject of Debate.

Lauren Goode: However, Perplexity did unveil a feature tailored for shopping in November, perfectly timed for the festive period. And I thought, "This appears to be the ideal one to kick things off with."

Michael Calore: Pleasant.

Lauren Goode: I ventured into Perplexity Pro, aiming to purchase a gift for a friend who is passionate about baking. She already owns an extensive collection of baking tools and excels in this hobby. My goal was to find a gift that was not only unique but also something she might not already possess, steering clear of basic items such as a rolling pin. I was looking for that special item that stood out.

Zoë Schiffer: To what extent did you share information about your friend with Perplexity, beyond her interest in baking?

Lauren Goode: The description wasn't overly thorough. Essentially, I mentioned she enjoys baking and already possesses all she needs. She has a taste for quality items. My goal is to express my gratitude to her.

Zoë Schiffer: Awesome.

Lauren Goode: A major perk of shopping with Perplexity Pro is their unique Buy button. When you utilize this button for purchases, you're rewarded with complimentary shipping. Essentially, they're enhancing the online shopping experience by aggregating it. They compile a series of products that might catch your eye. You might encounter a Buy button supported by Shopify, or come across one that's exclusive to Perplexity. It's an interesting concept. However, the issue arose with the first set of recommended products, which were quite disappointing.

Michael Calore: Alright, such as?

Lauren Goode presents: A small-scale baking kit for children.

Zoë Schiffer: They suggest, "Assist her in finding a connection with her youthful self."

Lauren Goode: Naturally, I placed an order right away and had it sent straight to Zoe so the kids could enjoy it. Additionally, it suggested something quite simplistic and cheeky, a hoodie emblazoned with the phrase, "My buns are gluten-free."

Zoë Schiffer: Gross. It's as if you're saying, "I mentioned she prefers luxury items. You fool."

Lauren Goode: Exactly, however, there was also this baking equipment from Switzerland that caught my eye in the midst of it all. I thought to myself, "That seems plausible." Yet, it appeared to be another basic item that avid bakers would likely already possess.

Michael Calore: Absolutely, I agree completely.

Lauren Goode: Following that, I decided to try out Rufus, Amazon's chatbot, on their site. It was quite amusing because, upon providing a similar query, it straightaway suggested purchasing a KitchenAid stand mixer over $400. Which, incidentally, is a fantastic addition to the kitchen for those who enjoy cooking and baking, but—

Zoë Schiffer: Another excellent item to consider purchasing used.

Michael Calore: The individual who enjoys baking possesses that as well.

Lauren Goode: Absolutely. And do they really believe I possess the wealth of Jeff Bezos?

Michael Calore: What type of companion is this?

Zoë Schiffer: They essentially said, "Given our sole encounter is with someone who might be the wealthiest individual globally, why not purchase a secluded island for your friend to enjoy baking on?"

Lauren Goode: Precisely. And next, I proceeded to ChatGPT.

Michael Calore: Understood.

Lauren Goode remarked that ChatGPT performed impressively.

Michael Calore: Certainly not.

Zoë Schiffer: Understood.

Lauren Goode: In my view, its strongest suit was really in the concept development stage.

ChatGPT [archival audio]: For a buddy who adores the art of pastry making and values sophisticated, unique presents, here are a few considerate suggestions that blend opulence, customization, and their fervor.

Lauren Goode: The approach wasn't a direct, "Click this link to purchase, make your purchase here, we're making it super simple for you." Instead, it was more like, and I'm summarizing, it appears you're aiming for consideration in your choices, so we've selected some considerate gift options for you. And this is what it conveyed.

Zoë Schiffer suggests: Firstly, a bespoke family recipe cutting board, a premium wood chopping board adorned with a treasured family recipe in beautiful handwritten script. Secondly, a custom-designed rolling pin, accompanied by a collection of gourmet ingredients including top-notch Madagascar vanilla beans, saffron, unusual spices, and unique sugars.

Lauren Goode: Thus, it didn't just offer suggestions, it also recommended places to purchase them. Initially, it didn't give direct links, but upon further inquiry, it did. I chose to buy the unique items, like Madagascar vanilla, saffron, and even gold flakes among others, thinking they'd be useful. The rest seemed a bit over-the-top.

Michael Calore: Indeed.

Zoë Schiffer: To some extent, yes, though I'm uncertain. However, the suggestions seemed quite beneficial to me. It's understandable why this particular advice stood out as the most useful, given that the stressful aspect of the process you mentioned initially isn't really about the tediousness of making a purchase. Instead, it's the struggle of coming up with unique gift ideas for others. So, the fact that these recommendations were very detailed and not something I would have immediately thought of myself, I find that quite intriguing.

Lauren Goode: Precisely. It's not a matter of simply hastening the purchase by 30 seconds with a Buy button. Rather, it's about being swamped with the brainstorming phase and seeking inspiration. Naturally, I did browse the web a bit more afterwards, but it effectively organized my options. It helped me decide on what to pursue.

Michael Calore: Additionally, that's the top vocal quality.

Zoë Schiffer mentioned, "I was about to comment on how impressive the voice quality was."

Lauren Goode: That's Cole for you. They've got these unique names, like Jasper, Cole. Perhaps Cole could help with sleep training your infant.

Zoë Schiffer: I'm aware.

Michael Calore expressed his dislike for the artificial insertion of hesitations such as "ums" and "ahs" in AI-generated voices, stating that they're unnecessary. However, he mentioned that Cole's voice quality was satisfactory

Lauren Goode: Absolutely. Shopping for my 16-year-old niece proved to be quite the humorous challenge, as I could vividly imagine the unimpressed looks she'd give me for choosing something completely out of touch. So, I put together a brief profile of her. She's in her junior year of high school, an avid reader with a beloved cat, and harbors aspirations of becoming a nurse. She's also busy preparing for her SATs. For gift ideas, I consulted Gemini, but the experience left much to be desired. Initially, it suggested a cat blanket, which puzzled me. I was uncertain if it meant a blanket adorned with cat images or a blanket intended for her cat – a known no-go area since cats typically prefer cardboard boxes to any cozy blanket you might provide.

Zoë Schiffer: It's like you're saying, "Gemini, has Gen Z ever unleashed their fury on you? I'm searching for fresher, more inventive concepts. Let's get moving."

Lauren Goode: Following that, the suggestion was to obtain an SAT guide for her.

Zoë Schiffer exclaimed, "Oh my God."

Lauren Goode expressed, "I was thinking, 'Wow…' I'd completely jeopardize my reputation as the cool aunt if I went ahead with that. They refer to me as the famous auntie, by the way, since they're aware I host a podcast and have a verified badge on certain social platforms. They find it incredibly cool. And I'm there thinking, 'Guys, that really doesn't hold any real value. It isn't.'"

Michael Calore: Right, so you should hand over eight dollars.

Lauren Goode: I ended up giving them quite a bit more than $8. It was a combination of cash and a gift card for both my niece and nephew, and they seemed really happy with it. It allows them the freedom to purchase whatever they desire, and they're at an age where the excitement of unwrapping presents isn't as appealing as it is for younger children. So, in terms of Gemini, that was a miss.

Michael Calore: From what you're saying, it seems like the experiences aimed at teenagers are lacking. Similarly, the ones that just throw a bunch of links at you aren't impressive. However, when it comes to generating new and unique ideas that wouldn't typically cross your mind, it actually proves to be quite effective.

Lauren Goode: Indeed, it's beneficial for generating ideas. However, it hasn't reached the stage where it operates independently, completing tasks overnight. That might be what we see in the future. Moreover, these chatbots seem to be in a phase of figuring out their exact purpose. Currently, Perplexity Pro's approach to shopping doesn't quite offer a compelling reason to do all one's shopping there, even though that's its ambition. It's essentially making its initial foray into the realm of retail. For them, the success metric seems to be if users spend a bit more time on Perplexity Pro compared to Amazon or Google, even if they eventually make their purchases elsewhere, they consider it a win.

Zoë Schiffer: Did you find the process to be more relaxed compared to the usual holiday shopping ordeal?

Lauren Goode: Honestly, no. I was behind on everything. I postponed several tasks, thinking, "I'll handle these next year." The special ingredient my friend was waiting for arrived post-holidays. Additionally, I attempted a trial with product returns, which we're all aware is a particularly tedious aspect of buying things. It's intriguing to imagine a future where, perhaps through interacting with chatbots or based on our previous purchases, we could simply say, "I need to make a return," and it would be taken care of for us. It would know the order details, manage the process, and maybe even print the return label on the spot. However, we're not there yet. Far from it. So, essentially, it's not proactive. It doesn't shop for you; it's more useful for generating ideas and doesn't assist with, for lack of a better term, the logistical follow-through. At this stage, it's essentially just a preliminary service.

Zoë Schiffer: Just.

Lauren Goode: Honestly, I'm still not a fan of shopping, but it's alright. Apologies, Cole.

Michael Calore: Alright, let's take a collective decision. On the whole, how satisfied have you been with utilizing AI to enhance your daily living? Zoe, your thoughts?

Zoë Schiffer: At this stage, I'd rate it a B minus. My hope is for it to excel, but currently, it seems merely satisfactory.

Michael Calore: Alright. Lauren?

Lauren Goode: My assessment is a firm B. The inclusion of ChatGPT significantly improves the rating, altering the standard.

Michael Calore: Good.

Lauren Goode: How about your thoughts, Mike?

Michael Calore: My rating would also be a B. I quipped about it earlier, but honestly, if you're adept at using the internet and searching online, then Gemini's insights aren't necessary for you. However, for those who are intrigued by the idea of interacting with technology and are novices in navigating this fresh terrain, it serves its purpose adequately. It didn't offer me anything particularly negative. The salad, too, gets a B from me.

Lauren Goode: Oh, my.

Michael Calore: That wraps up today's episode. Join us again next week for a discussion on the evolution of content moderation, its current state, and future directions. Thank you for tuning into Uncanny Valley. If you enjoyed our episode, please follow us and leave a rating on your preferred podcast platform. For any inquiries, feedback, or ideas for future episodes, feel free to reach out to us at uncannyvalley@wired.com. Today's episode was produced by Kyana Moghadam, with mixing by Amar Lal at Macro Sound. Our executive producer is Jordan Bell, and Chris Bannon serves as the head of global audio for Condé Nast.

Suggested For You…

Direct to your email: A selection of our top stories, curated daily just for you.

Live video streams and vehicle information are being exposed by license plate scanners

Cash Galore: Explore our exclusive edition right here

Top 17 Electric Vehicles Arriving in 202

Visualization: Monitoring all artificial intelligence copyright litigation in the United States

Additional Content from WIRED

Critiques and Manuals

© 2025 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. Purchases made via our website may result in a commission for WIRED, as part of our affiliate agreements with retail partners. Reproduction, distribution, transmission, caching, or any other form of usage of the site's content is strictly prohibited without the explicit consent of Condé Nast. Advertisement Choices

Choose a global website


Discover more from Automobilnews News - The first AI News Portal world wide

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

AI

Fake Fields: The Alarming Rise of AI-Generated Sports News and the Fight Against Online Content Fraud

Published

on

By

The Sports Article You Opened Might Be Generated by AI

Before you dive into reading sports updates on the web, take a second look at the website address.

Take, for example, a title such as "Red Sox Encouraged to Skip Alex Bregman for a $427 Million Phenomenon" which might appear normal and seemingly originates from BBC Sports. However, upon a detailed examination, it turns out to be a counterfeit version named “BBCSportss,” and the content is plagiarized from Sports Illustrated. Additionally, within the same site, there are articles that haven't been directly copied from another author but rather seem to be a jumbled rehash of various sports bloggers' content, likely produced by artificial intelligence.

DoubleVerify, a company specializing in monitoring digital advertisements and media metrics, recently carried out a study on a group of more than 200 websites. These sites appeared to blend content generated by artificial intelligence with pieces of news articles lifted from real news sources. The study found that these websites frequently selected domain names and crafted their site designs to resemble those of well-known media entities such as ESPN, NBC, Fox, CBS, and the BBC. A significant number of these counterfeit sites present themselves as authentic sports news platforms.

Paige Graham, representing Sports Illustrated, stated, "The content under the name 'BBC Sportss' did not receive our approval and is actually a case of plagiarism."

"According to Dan Slivjanovski, the chief marketing officer at DoubleVerify, the rate at which fraudulent activities are increasing is alarming, with a year-over-year doubling or even tripling in occurrences. A significant portion of this fraud is attributed to bots that consume rather than produce content, artificially inflating website traffic to illicitly gain advertising dollars by simulating an increase in genuine viewer engagement. Additionally, DoubleVerify has noted a significant rise in the manipulation involving AI click farms. These are operations where networks of websites are filled with content generated by artificial intelligence, aiming to divert both legitimate readers and advertising revenue from authentic news sources."

DoubleVerify has identified a network dubbed "Synthetic Echo," which is known for replicating content from various sources, utilizing AI to create articles, or employing a combination of both strategies. Gilit Saporta, the head of the organization's fraud detection division, commented, "It's not even about spreading false information. It's essentially just incoherent content." According to Saporta, while this isn't the first instance of such a content scheme she has come across, what makes this particular case stand out is the apparent consistency in web design across multiple sites, indicating a clear connection between them.

WIRED requested Reality Defender, a company specializing in identifying deepfakes, to examine a selection of sites from the Synthetic Echo network. Upon reviewing the latest posts from "NBC Sportz," the firm concluded that although the material was originally created by human authors, it was plagiarized from authentic news platforms. The original authors' names were removed and replaced with "nbcsportz" as the source.

A website was found to have illegally republished content from the Detroit Free Press without permission. The Detroit Free Press has stated that the republished work was not approved or given a license by them. "The unauthorized content does not reflect our brand or the quality of our journalism," mentioned Lark-Marie Antón, a representative for the Detroit Free Press. The organization intends to pursue legal measures in response.

In its evaluation, Reality Defender also examined NBCSport.co.uk and BBCSportss.co.uk, finding that all the analyzed articles from these sites were probably produced by artificial intelligence, a conclusion that supports DoubleVerify's research.

NBC Sportz remained silent and did not reply to any inquiries for feedback. Both NBCSport.co.uk and BBCSportss.co.uk lack publicly available contact details, leaving WIRED without a means to reach out. These websites, along with a site mimicking CBS News suspected by DoubleVerify to be part of the Synthetic Echo network, are all registered under the domain registrar Namecheap.

For a long time, unauthorized individuals have tried to benefit from the success of established media platforms by redistributing their content illegally. However, the advent of AI technologies has enabled these practices to spread more rapidly than before. “The creation of substandard content isn’t a novel issue,” Saporta observes. “Yet, the modern technologies available today make it far simpler to duplicate and expand on a much larger scale.”

The quantity of websites producing low-quality content through artificial intelligence has seen a significant spike annually following the surge in generative AI tools' prominence in 2023. In February, not long after WIRED initially covered the emergence of content mills powered by AI, the media oversight organization NewsGuard had pinpointed 725 websites inundated with AI-generated articles. By January 2025, this figure had escalated to at least 1,150 such sites.

"The quantity has increased," states Shouvik Paul, the chief operations officer at Copyleaks, an AI detection firm. "Many of these operations are run from abroad and are quite dubious, so how can you possibly stay ahead?"

Adding to the perplexity for the audience, several leading news websites have dabbled in producing news pieces crafted by artificial intelligence. (For instance, Sports Illustrated reportedly featured content created by AI, which, according to its owning corporation, was sourced from an external provider.) Elsewhere, individuals keen on exploiting domain names have acquired web addresses of struggling media outlets, reviving them as production houses for AI-generated articles, often substituting their once reputable reporting with insubstantial, automated drivel.

A number of these platforms have started causing actual misunderstandings; in October, a digital marketing agency released a computer-generated notice about a Halloween procession in Dublin, Ireland. Despite there being no scheduled event, large crowds of party-goers arrived in anticipation of celebrations.

Paul from Copyleaks likened the tactic employed by certain websites, which adopt the look and feel of legitimate media outlets to distribute low-quality content, to a form of phishing. He noted that some of these websites go beyond mere imitation, engaging in actual phishing activities. For instance, DoubleVerify discovered a site within this network that mimicked a Nigerian Fox news outlet, bombarding visitors with dubious pop-up advertisements for software.

Despite the questionable appearance of the pop-up ads, the websites associated with this cluster seem to engage heavily in programmatic advertising. This type of advertising relies on automated, large-scale purchases instead of direct negotiations between specific websites and advertisers. These sites are often filled with banner ads managed by well-known programmatic ad servers such as Criteo and Sharethrough, both of which did not reply to inquiries for comments. According to a report by DoubleVerify, the creators behind Synthetic Echo strategically selected sports content as a primary focus due to its perception as being safer for brands compared to hard news.

While WIRED was observing various websites, automated advertisements from several leading firms were noticed, including technology leaders such as Asana and Oracle, online retail heavyweight Net-A-Porter, cosmetics powerhouse Sephora, and vacation destination Kalahari Resorts. When approached for a statement, none of these entities provided a response.

In an era characterized by dwindling confidence in the press and decreasing income for numerous news organizations, the emergence of these low-quality content factories represents a twofold problem. They contaminate the realm of information with inferior and plagiarized material, while also diverting advertising dollars away from genuine content creators.

Consider Exploring Further…

Direct to your email: Subscribe to Plaintext for Steven Levy's in-depth perspective on technology.

Perhaps it's the right moment to purge outdated conversation records.

Cash, Cash, Cash: Explore our exclusive edition here

The antics surrounding memecoins are only beginning.

Mysterious Depths: A Behind-the-Scenes Examination of Silicon Valley's Impact

Additional Content from WIRED

Evaluations and Manuals

© 2025 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. A share of revenue from products bought via our website may go to WIRED, as a result of our Affiliate Agreements with retail partners. Content from this site cannot be copied, shared, sent, stored, or utilized in any form without explicit prior consent from Condé Nast. Choices in Advertising

Choose a global website


Discover more from Automobilnews News - The first AI News Portal world wide

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

AI

Balancing Act: Navigating the Benefits and Pitfalls of Personal AI Agents in Daily Life

Published

on

By

AI Assistants Have Arrived. What Limits Should We Set on Their Capabilities?

Is it wise for me to employ a personal AI assistant to aid in managing my everyday activities?

—In Search of Help

Generally speaking, I believe that depending too much on any form of automation in our everyday activities can be risky if overdone, and can even feel isolating if used sparingly, particularly when it comes to interactions with others. Having an AI assistant that manages my schedule and compiles links for additional research? Wonderful. But an AI assistant that sends automated updates to my parents on a weekly basis? Terrible.

The most compelling reason to limit the integration of additional generative AI applications into your everyday activities is their ongoing environmental toll during both the training phase and the creation of outputs. Bearing this in consideration, I explored the archives of WIRED, from the early, chaotic days of what we now know as the internet, to provide a deeper historical background for your inquiry. After a thorough search, I returned with the conclusion that it's very probable you're already engaging with AI tools on a daily basis.

The concept of AI agents, or the more daunting term "agentic AI," has become the latest trend among tech executives eager to promote their latest investments. However, the notion of a digital helper designed to carry out software-related tasks is hardly new. The discussions that took place in the 1990s about "software agents" closely resemble today's talks in Silicon Valley. Here, tech moguls are forecasting a surge of generative AI agents geared towards handling our internet tasks for us.

In a 1995 WIRED interview, MIT professor Pattie Maes expressed concerns over accountability regarding the behavior of agents. She highlighted potential issues, such as agents occupying excessive machine time or making unwanted purchases. Despite these challenges, Maes firmly believes that agents will become indispensable, stirring up numerous intriguing questions along the way.

In the early days of January, I reached out to Maes to get her current views on AI agents and how they've evolved. Her enthusiasm for the possibilities of personal automation remains high, yet she firmly believes that engineers, whom she describes as "extremely naive," are neglecting the intricate aspects of how humans and computers interact. She warns that such negligence might lead to another period of stagnation in AI development, reminiscent of the AI winter.

"She points out that the current construction of these systems prioritizes technical and engineering efficiencies," she explains. "However, they fall short when it comes to considerations of human-centric design." Her emphasis is on the susceptibility of AI agents to deception or to adopting prejudiced views, even as the fundamental models see enhancements. This overconfidence in the systems causes users to place undue trust in the outputs of AI technologies, often when it's unwarranted.

To gain a clearer insight into other possible challenges for personal AI assistants, we can divide the broad concept into two separate groups: the ones that provide information to you and the ones that act on your behalf.

Feeding agents utilize algorithms that analyze your preferences and behaviors to sift through vast amounts of data to pinpoint what matters to you. This concept probably rings a bell. Think of it as the technology behind social media platforms that curate your feed with posts you'll likely enjoy or the relentless advertising algorithms that keep showing you the same mushroom gummy ads on Instagram. These can be seen as your own AI agents working to personalize your online experience. For instance, in an interview from the 1990s, Maes talked about a news-collecting agent designed to filter and present articles of interest to her, much like how my Google News page seems to know exactly what I like to read.

The problem with overly depending on AI assistants is the gradual onset of comfort that leads to indifference. The more I allow algorithms to tailor the content and recommendations for me, the more likely I am to fall into a routine of predictable choices, encountering fewer unexpected delights. Should I rely on an AI to organize my weekly grocery shopping and utilize a delivery service for my purchases, initially, the efficiency might appeal to me. However, over time, the repetitive nature of this convenience could discourage me from trying out new recipes. Thus, life slowly turns into a journey of increasing dullness.

Regarding AI entities acting as your proxies, they are fundamentally just complex software routines. Their purpose is to observe and emulate your actions, thereby enabling them to represent you in various online settings. Imagine a virtual counterpart capable of participating in video conferences, crafting gratitude messages for your wedding attendees, and making dinner reservations on your behalf. This category also encompasses advanced AI applications designed to mimic celebrities and automatically engage with their followers.

Steer clear of utilizing or engaging with these AI duplicates, regardless of the situation. The virtual realm has surpassed the tangible one in significance, with much of our existence now filtered through digital interfaces. Although technology might improve to the point where deploying an AI to video call my grandmother or allowing it to participate in a group chat with my buddies doesn't seem absurd, we ought to reserve automation for monotonous activities. It's crucial to be present and authentic in our digital communications, as it's becoming the predominant way we connect.

Participate in Discussions

Become a part of the WIRED family by contributing

Something to Check Out…

Direct to your email: A selection of our top stories, carefully chosen for you daily.

Live video streams and automobile information are being exposed by license plate scanners.

Cash Galore: Explore our exclusive edition now

The Top 17 Electric Vehicles Arriving in

Tracking Visualization: Monitoring all AI-related copyright legal cases in the US

Additional Content from WIRED

Insights and Tutorials

© 2025 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. Purchases made via our website may result in a commission for WIRED, as part of our affiliate agreements with retail partners. Content from this site cannot be copied, shared, broadcast, stored, or used in any form without explicit consent from Condé Nast. Ad Choices

Choose a global website


Discover more from Automobilnews News - The first AI News Portal world wide

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

AI

The AI Arms Race: Navigating the Perils of ‘Beating China’ and the Risks of a Zero-Sum Game

Published

on

By

The Risks of Outpacing China in AI

This week, the Biden administration announced fresh export controls aimed at governing the worldwide development of AI, with a specific focus on stopping China from acquiring the most sophisticated AI technologies. These regulations follow a series of actions taken by both the Donald Trump and Joe Biden administrations aimed at curbing the advancement of Chinese AI capabilities.

Leading voices in artificial intelligence, such as Sam Altman of OpenAI and Dario Amodei from Anthropic, have raised alarms about the importance of outpacing China in AI development. This has led to speculation that the Trump administration could intensify its efforts in this area.

Paul Triolo holds a partnership at DGA Group, an international consultancy, serves on the council of foreign relations, and offers his expertise as a senior advisor for the University of Pennsylvania’s initiative on US-China future relations. Alvin Graylin is a business innovator with a history of managing the Chinese segment of the Taiwanese tech company HPC. The duo has been closely monitoring the evolution of China's artificial intelligence sector and the effects of US punitive measures. Through an email conversation, Triolo and Graylin exchanged thoughts on the recent sanctions, the discourse in Silicon Valley, and the risks associated with viewing the global AI landscape as a winner-takes-all battle.

This interview underwent editing to enhance its clarity and conciseness.

How do you interpret the recent regulation on AI dissemination introduced by the US administration, designed to limit China's ability to acquire artificial intelligence technology?

Paul Triolo commented that the regulation primarily targets high-performance computing groups. Additionally, it imposes restrictions on the proprietary model weights of cutting-edge "frontier" models, though the criteria for defining their performance levels remain vague. Furthermore, he noted that most AI models with open-access weights are refined and enhanced by users, which includes leading AI firms in China.

The intricate regulations and ambiguous requirements for adherence introduce significant unpredictability into the future strategies of both medium-sized and large US and Western hyper-scale operators.

For major cloud computing giants such as Google, Microsoft, AWS, and Oracle, this regulation presents significant challenges. These include impeded or more complicated global growth, additional compliance and legal expenses, effects on worldwide research and development, and ambiguous regulatory enforcement obligations.

What impact have prior actions, such as the sanctions implemented during the initial term of the Trump administration, had on the artificial intelligence sector in that region?

Paul Triolo highlights that while U.S. export restrictions have indeed hindered China's progress, these measures have simultaneously galvanized the Chinese government's resolve to achieve greater self-sufficiency. The government has invested billions in bolstering domestic companies to either advance technologically or expand their production capabilities in essential sectors. This has led to noteworthy shifts in the semiconductor industry and enhanced its capacity to provide the sophisticated hardware necessary for creating cutting-edge AI models.

Chinese AI creators have become adept at utilizing older AI technology from Western companies, while progressively incorporating local solutions into their production workflow. Chinese companies are expected to keep advancing in both AI hardware and software sectors, although possibly not as quickly as their Western peers.

What's the reason behind Silicon Valley's growing emphasis on outpacing China in artificial intelligence?

Paul Triolo highlights an increasing connection between right-leaning investors in Silicon Valley and tech enterprises that amplify concerns about China's threat for their benefit. This merging of interests, which mixes the perceived danger from China with financial motivations and resistance to AI regulation, is concerning. Triolo also points out that it frames the rivalry between the US and China over AI technology as an all-or-nothing battle, a perspective he finds particularly risky.

The narrative of zero-sum competition is expected to significantly shape the Trump administration's policies, especially considering the influential positions that technology moguls and venture capitalists will hold. Figures who are central in the artificial intelligence domain and have strong connections with the American government, like OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman and Anthropic's CEO Dario Amodei, have already expressed views through op-eds, remarks, or official company announcements that support the idea of a Chinese AI threat and the notion of a zero-sum game.

Elon Musk is expected to challenge this storyline. He has previously advocated for global collaboration and the careful management of artificial intelligence. Musk has also expressed worries regarding the safety of AI, emphasizing the need for a worldwide approach to tackle these issues, which includes working alongside China.

Wouldn't the US have the desire to outperform China?

Alvin Graylin posits that the narrative being pushed implies that the US and China should not work together in sectors like healthcare and energy creation, all under the guise of maintaining US and its allies' superiority in AI advancement. He argues that it's unfeasible for either nation to achieve and hold a lasting advantage over the other and ultimately triumph in this competition.

The prevailing mindset shaping America's strategy towards China and Artificial Intelligence (AI) is the expectation of upcoming confrontation. This perspective is coupled with the somewhat unclear belief that AI will play a critical role in both the economic and military spheres. Nonetheless, authorities have encountered difficulties in pinpointing the precise "important military uses" that raise alarm.

Conversely, joint research efforts have been essential for significant advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) over the past several years. Industry reports indicate that nearly half of the leading AI scientists worldwide (47 percent) have origins or received their education in China. Disrupting this beneficial pattern seems to be a hazardous and unwise move, yet the current trends suggest it is happening. Additionally, there's a substantial danger that China may withdraw from collaborative initiatives to create a framework for AI governance, which would hinder the establishment of an effective international system for ensuring AI safety.

To what extent does the United States truly maintain an advantage?

Alvin Graylin: It was commonly agreed upon in Silicon Valley that the US was ahead of China by one to two years in the advancement of artificial intelligence.

Recent advancements in generative video and photo technology from China are now showing capabilities on par with the best from the United States. The launch of the highly effective DeepSeek r1 and v3 models, surpassing the capabilities of OpenAI's leading o1 reasoning and GPT4o models, suggests that China is quickly catching up. This progress is partially due to a strategic shift towards inference computing, which requires less dependence on cutting-edge semiconductor technology, essentially circumventing the impact of sanctions. Remarkably, DeepSeek, established only in 2023 with a team of fewer than 100 employees and significantly fewer computing resources compared to its Western counterparts, has achieved this feat.

Regulations implemented by the US government on China in the tech sector are inadvertently pushing Chinese developers to innovate and manage resources more adeptly than their Western peers. Additionally, China might hold the upper hand when it comes to gathering the private data essential for training cutting-edge models. Given the current international policies that restrict data sharing between countries, we're on a troubling trajectory towards a future where 193 highly advanced "sovereign AI" models exist, each confined to specific cultural and ethical frameworks. While this scenario may boost Nvidia's stock value, it spells a dystopian horror for the global population.

What guidance would you offer to the newly elected president and their team?

Paul Triolo emphasizes that the intensifying rivalry in artificial intelligence between the United States and China presents considerable risks not just to the two countries involved but to the whole planet. Such a competition has the potential to result in situations that could jeopardize worldwide harmony, economic steadiness, and advancements in technology.

The United States and China should adjust their strategies concerning artificial intelligence (AI) development, shifting their perspective from primarily viewing AI as a tool for military purposes. It is important for these nations to engage in meaningful discussions aimed at creating universal guidelines for AI governance and to support the formation of an international coalition focused on AI safety. Additionally, both countries need to reach a consensus on the ethical use of AI and work together on developing mechanisms to oversee and address any misuse on a global scale. It is crucial for governments around the world to encourage collaborations between academia and the private sector that transcend national boundaries. A concerted global effort, similar to what CERN represents for physics, would be far more beneficial and lead to a more harmonious outcome than pursuing an AI initiative reminiscent of the Manhattan Project, which currently has support from various policymakers.

We're faced with a clear yet straightforward decision: continue on a course of conflict that will likely result in shared damage, or shift towards cooperation, presenting an opportunity for a thriving and secure future for everyone.

Do you believe the United States ought to halt its efforts to impede China's progress in artificial intelligence? We'd love to hear your opinions in the comment section below.

Join the conversation by becoming a part of the WIRED community and share your thoughts

Recommended for You…

Delivered to your email: Will Knight delves into the latest developments in artificial intelligence through his AI Lab series.

The incidents at the school were staged. However, the fear they caused was

Cash, Cash, Cash: Explore our exclusive edition right here

HTML is genuinely considered a coding language—challenge accepted.

The WIRED 101: The top gadgets currently on the market

Additional Content from WIRED

Critiques and Instructions

© 2025 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. Purchases made through our website may result in WIRED receiving a share of the sales, as a result of our Affiliate Agreements with retail partners. Content on this website cannot be copied, shared, broadcast, stored, or utilized in any form without explicit prior consent from Condé Nast. Advertisement Choices

Choose a global website


Discover more from Automobilnews News - The first AI News Portal world wide

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

AI

From Chess Legend to AI Titan: The Sheikh Spearheading a $1.5 Trillion Tech Ambition

Published

on

By

A Sheikh Who Leads Espionage Commands a $1.5 Trillion Wealth. His Goal is to Lead in AI Development

During a period in the mid-2000s, a large metallic box situated in Abu Dhabi held the title of the world's best chess player. Known as Hydra, this compact supercomputer consisted of a cabinet packed with high-performance processors and custom-built chips, interconnected by fiber-optic cables and connected to the internet.

During a period where chess served as the primary battlefield for AI versus human contests, Hydra's achievements momentarily ascended to legendary status. The New Yorker detailed its rising creativity in an in-depth 5,000-word article; WIRED labeled Hydra as “formidable”; and chess magazines described its triumphs using the intense language typical of wrestling broadcasts. According to these accounts, Hydra was a “colossal machine” that “gradually suffocated” human grand masters in competition.

Consistent with its monstrous persona, Hydra exemplified uniqueness and isolation. Unlike its contemporaries, which operated on standard personal computers and were accessible for public download, Hydra's formidable capabilities were anchored to a 32-processor cluster, exclusive to a single user at any given moment. By the mid-year of 2005, this exclusivity had grown to such an extent that even Hydra's own creators found themselves vying for opportunities to engage with their brainchild.

The reason behind this is the group's benefactor—a 36-year-old man from the UAE who had employed them and financed Hydra's advanced equipment—was occupied with enjoying his gains. In a 2005 post on a chess forum online, Hydra's lead designer from Austria, Chrilly Donninger, referred to this supporter as the most passionate enthusiast of computer chess in existence. "The financier," he mentioned, "is fond of engaging with Hydra in games all day and night."

Using the pseudonym zor_champ, the sponsor from the UAE would participate in internet chess competitions, teaming up with Hydra to form a duo of human and AI. This combination frequently led to them overwhelming their opponents. An engineer shared with me, “He was fascinated by the synergy between human and technology. His passion was in securing victories.”

Over time, Hydra was surpassed by rival chess machines and its production ceased in the late 2000s. However, zor_champ emerged as a highly influential yet enigmatic figure globally. He is actually Sheikh Tahnoun bin Zayed al Nahyan.

Sporting a beard and often found wearing dark shades, Tahnoun holds the position of national security adviser for the United Arab Emirates, serving as the top intelligence official for one of the globe's richest and most keen on surveillance small countries. He is also the younger sibling of the nation's ruler who governs with absolute power, Mohamed bin Zayed al Nahyan. However, what sets him apart, especially for someone in his line of work, is his authority over a significant portion of Abu Dhabi's enormous sovereign wealth. According to a report by Bloomberg News from the previous year, he manages an empire valued at $1.5 trillion, an amount that surpasses the wealth controlled by nearly any other individual worldwide.

Tahnoun's unique persona blends elements of a Gulf monarchy member, a health-conscious technology entrepreneur, and a character reminiscent of a villain from a James Bond movie. He oversees an expansive technology empire known as G42, named after the iconic answer to life's ultimate question in "The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy," where "42" represents the ultimate answer from a supercomputer. This conglomerate is deeply involved in various sectors, including artificial intelligence and biotech, with a particular emphasis on government-backed cyber espionage and surveillance technologies. Tahnoun has a deep passion for Brazilian jiujitsu and cycling, often seen wearing sunglasses even indoors due to light sensitivity, and is frequently in the company of UFC champions and experts in mixed martial arts.

A business professional and a security expert, both of whom have had meetings with Tahnoun, shared that gaining an audience with him involves navigating through his trusted inner circle. Should one manage this, an opportunity to converse may arise while accompanying the sheikh on a ride around his personal velodrome. The security expert mentioned that Tahnoun dedicates considerable time to relaxation in a sensory deprivation tank and has invited wellness expert Peter Attia to the UAE for advice on extending his lifespan. A business figure who attended the conversation revealed that Tahnoun has even motivated Mohammed bin Salman, the influential crown prince of Saudi Arabia, to reduce his consumption of junk food and embark on a journey with him aiming for a lifespan of 150 years.

In recent times, Sheikh Tahnoun's focus has shifted significantly. What once was a passion for chess and technology has evolved into a grander ambition: a $100 billion initiative aimed at positioning Abu Dhabi as a leading force in artificial intelligence. This time, his acquisition target is none other than the tech sector of the United States itself.

In the strategic game of the global AI competition, the United States currently leads, primarily due to a straightforward factor. Nvidia, a hardware company based in the US, produces the processors essential for developing the most advanced AI technologies. Furthermore, the US has implemented regulations to limit the export of these crucial Nvidia GPUs (graphics processing units) beyond its borders. To capitalize on this precarious yet significant advantage over China, the leaders of the largest AI corporations in the US have embarked on a global campaign, engaging with the wealthiest investors worldwide, including figures like Tahnoun, to secure funding for what is essentially a massive expansion effort.

Beneath the surface of every digital voice and automated response lies a massive, buzzing data warehouse: Countless towering racks of server cabinets, neatly organized and operating at energy levels significantly higher than typical online searches. Behind these, yet another layer of data centers exists, dedicated to the development of basic AI frameworks. To meet the growing needs, AI enterprises are in constant pursuit of additional data storage facilities worldwide, requiring not just space, but also water for cooling, electricity for operation, and semiconductors for functionality. Nvidia's CEO, Jensen Huang, has forecasted an investment of one trillion dollars by technology firms into new AI infrastructure within the coming five years.

The development of the upcoming stage of artificial intelligence is anticipated to demand staggering quantities of funding, property, and power. The Gulf States, rich in oil and energy resources, have these necessities in abundance. In recent times, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Qatar have established significant funds dedicated to AI investments. Among these, the United Arab Emirates stands out as a highly appealing collaborator for several reasons, including its vast financial resources, its freshly inaugurated nuclear power facilities, and the advanced state of its AI industry.

However, there's a complication: Engaging in AI collaboration with the UAE inevitably means dealing with Sheikh Tahnoun directly or indirectly—and for an extended period, his key tech alliances have predominantly been with Chinese entities.

The collaboration seemed inevitable, considering Tahnoun's background as an intelligence director with significant investments in advanced surveillance technology. Throughout the early 2020s, Tahnoun cultivated strong connections with China, both commercially and personally, leading to the point where G42's products were almost identical to those from China. Specifically, a G42 offshoot named Presight AI offered surveillance software to global police departments that closely mirrored the technology used by Chinese police forces. Furthermore, the influence of Huawei, a leading Chinese telecommunications firm, on G42 was profound. At the onset of the rapid development in generative AI, Huawei’s technicians had unrestricted access to Abu Dhabi’s most critical tech installations, where they played a key role in developing extensive AI training facilities.

In August 2023, the United States imposed significant restrictions, limiting the export of Nvidia graphics processing units (GPUs) to the Middle East, a crucial move that impacted Abu Dhabi's aspirations in artificial intelligence, as these were the components they needed most. Additionally, any company utilizing Huawei technology was barred from receiving these exports. In response, Tahnoun made a decisive shift. By the beginning of 2024, G42 declared it was cutting off its relationship with China and would remove all Chinese-made technology. Following this announcement, Chinese citizens started to leave the tech industry in Abu Dhabi discreetly.

During this period, leaders from the US and UAE engaged in an intense period of mutual flattery and alliance-building. A large contingent of PR experts, legal advisors, and lobbyists from the Washington, D.C. area were mobilized to depict Tahnoun as a reliable partner for the US, especially in terms of handling technology and earning trust. Marty Edelman, the emirate's most relied upon American legal advisor, directed this campaign from New York. The UAE's envoy to the US, Yousef Al Otaiba, used his significant influence to endorse Tahnoun. At the same time, figures from the US government and technology sector worked to attract a substantial influx of investment from the UAE to American AI startups, seeking to capitalize on the financial opportunities it presented.

An unexpected indicator of an agreement between two parties emerged when, in a surprising twist, a transaction occurred in the reverse direction. As part of a distinctive deal facilitated primarily by representatives from the Biden administration, Microsoft disclosed in April 2024 its decision to invest $1.5 billion into Tahnoun’s G42, thereby obtaining a minority ownership in the entity. A Biden administration official involved in guiding the deal stated the goal was to encourage G42 to collaborate with Microsoft as a Huawei alternative. In the initial stage of this partnership, G42 would be granted access to Microsoft's artificial intelligence capabilities through its Azure cloud service, operating from a data center within the UAE. Furthermore, Brad Smith, the president of Microsoft, would take up a position on G42’s board, serving as a sort of American oversight presence within the firm.

The substantial financial inflows from the UAE were yet to materialize, as was the delivery of Nvidia chips to Abu Dhabi. However, the agreement with Microsoft was effectively an endorsement from the US government, encouraging more business engagements with the Emirates. In the summer of 2024, Tahnoun launched a diplomatic tour across the United States, which included a visit to Elon Musk in Texas and a jiujitsu practice session with Mark Zuckerberg. He then rapidly met with other tech giants such as Bill Gates, Satya Nadella, and Jeff Bezos. But the most crucial discussions took place at the White House, involving key figures like Jake Sullivan, the national security adviser, Gina Raimondo, the Commerce secretary, and even President Joe Biden.

Efforts to reshape the perception of Tahnoun and G42 were escalating, just as the United States appeared ready to ease restrictions on the export of sophisticated chips to the UAE. This move, however, met with urgent concerns from some members of the US national security community. They worried that this could lead to the transfer of American intellectual property to China. "The Emiratis are experts at playing both sides," a former high-ranking US security official confided. "The big question on everyone's mind is whether they're doing exactly that." In a July public statement, US Representative Michael McCaul, who leads the House Foreign Affairs Committee, advocated for the implementation of "far stronger national security measures" on the UAE prior to any sensitive technological exports from the US.

Another concern revolves around the United Arab Emirates (UAE) itself, a nation which shares similarities with Beijing in its ambition to deploy AI for governmental oversight. Eva Galperin, the cybersecurity director at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, highlights the UAE's reputation for authoritarian governance, poor human rights practices, and its track record of leveraging technology to monitor activists, journalists, and political opponents. Galperin expresses certainty regarding the UAE's intentions to steer AI evolution in a direction that benefits authoritarian regimes rather than supporting democratic principles or universal human values.

During the same period over the summer when Tahnoun was making his rounds through various American martial arts studios and corporate boardrooms, Mohammed bin Salman, the Saudi Arabian crown prince, was entertaining top minds in technology at his sprawling hunting reserve in South Africa, known as Ekland. This gathering included notable figures like ex-Google CEO Eric Schmidt. Their time was spent exploring wildlife reserves, enjoying the services of personal butlers, and engaging in conversations about how Saudi Arabia could shape the future of artificial intelligence.

Shortly afterwards, Schmidt visited the Biden administration to express his worries about America's inability to generate sufficient power for AI competition. He proposed enhancing economic and commercial connections with Canada, which is abundant in hydroelectric resources. In a video conference with Stanford students the next week, he mentioned, "The other option is to let the Arabs invest in [AI].” He added, “Personally, I have nothing against the Arabs… However, they won't follow our national security guidelines.”

Worries about the Gulf States' dependability as partners (along with their inclination towards controversial actions such as attacking journalists and initiating wars through proxies) have not halted their investments into American technology firms. At the beginning of the year, Saudi Arabia's sovereign Public Investment Fund revealed a $40 billion initiative dedicated to AI investments, supported through a strategic collaboration with the Silicon Valley-based venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz. Additionally, Kingdom Holding, managed by a Saudi royal closely aligned with the crown prince, has become one of the largest stakeholders in Elon Musk’s venture, xAI.

The New York Times has reported that Saudi Arabia became the top global investor in artificial intelligence thanks to a new fund. However, this status was soon surpassed in September when the United Arab Emirates took the lead. Abu Dhabi unveiled MGX, an AI investment initiative collaborating with major entities like BlackRock, Microsoft, and Global Infrastructure Partners. This partnership aims to invest over $100 billion in various projects, including the establishment of a broad network of data centers and power facilities throughout the United States. MGX, which falls under Tahnoun's sovereign wealth collection, is also said to be in preliminary discussions with OpenAI's CEO, Sam Altman. These talks focus on an ambitious plan, valued between $5 to $7 trillion, to develop a chipmaking enterprise. This venture seeks to offer an alternative to the limited supply of Nvidia's GPUs.

Funds from the United Arab Emirates were now readily flowing. Following the announcement from MGX, it was shortly reported by the news outlet Semafor that the US had authorized Nvidia to conduct GPU sales to G42. It was noted that some of these processors were already in use in Abu Dhabi, with reports highlighting a significant purchase of the Nvidia H100 models. This development indicated that the US had provided Tahnoun with the essential technology needed to advance his ambitious project, Hydra. This situation brings to the forefront two critical inquiries: What strategy is Sheikh Tahnoun employing this time around? And what means did he use to amass such considerable wealth?

At its core, virtually every narrative involving Gulf royalty revolves around the theme of inheritance. It's about dynastic families safeguarding against outside dangers, and the familial conflicts that arise in the scramble for power that comes with succession.

Tahnoun and Mohamed, siblings, are the offspring of Zayed bin Sultan al Nahyan, the inaugural president of the UAE, a legendary leader cherished as the nation's founding father.

Throughout his early years, the area now known as Abu Dhabi was primarily a modest, seasonal fishing community characterized by its severe weather conditions, limited fresh water sources, and a transient population of around 2,000 individuals. The wider emirate was home to several thousand additional Bedouin residents. The ruling al Nahyan family received payments in the form of tributes and taxes, overseeing the emirate's communal assets. Their way of life wasn't significantly different from that of their fellow tribespeople. However, leadership came with its risks. Before Zayed's time, two out of the last four leaders of Abu Dhabi had met their end through fratricide, while another was eliminated by an opposing tribe.

In 1966, with the support of the British and amidst the influx of newfound oil wealth into Abu Dhabi, Zayed took over leadership from his elder brother through a peaceful coup. Unlike his brother, who was hesitant to use Abu Dhabi's burgeoning wealth, Zayed was open to progress and innovation. He had a forward-looking goal of bringing various tribes together within one nation, laying the groundwork for the establishment of the United Arab Emirates in 1971.

At the time of the United Arab Emirates' establishment, Tahnoun was nearing his third birthday. As one of the approximately twenty sons of Zayed, Tahnoun holds a special position as part of the Bani Fatima group—this refers to the six sons born to Zayed's preferred wife, Fatima, who are considered his primary successors. Zayed had a vision for these sons, encouraging them to explore the world and prepare themselves to lead the UAE into its future. While he was instrumental in ensuring the distribution of the newfound oil wealth among the Bedouins of Abu Dhabi, Zayed directed his children away from engaging in business ventures for personal gain. This approach likely stemmed from a desire to avoid the turmoil of assassinations and coups that marked the region's history, aiming to dispel any notion that the al Nahyan family was exploiting their guardianship of the nation for personal advantage.

In the mid-90s, Tahnoun arrived in Southern California. In 1995, he entered a Brazilian jiujitsu training center in San Diego, seeking instruction. He presented himself as "Ben" and, as reported by Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu Eastern Europe’s website, he made a concerted effort to demonstrate modesty, often arriving before others and assisting in tidying up the place. It was only after some time that he disclosed his true identity as a prince from Abu Dhabi.

In the late 1990s, as Zayed's health declined, his sons started to assume more significant responsibilities and ventured into entrepreneurship, diverging from his directives. During this period, Tahnoun established his inaugural holding company, the Royal Group, which he utilized to develop the Hydra chess computer. Additionally, he founded a robotics firm that created REEM-C, a humanoid robot named after an Abu Dhabi island where he had invested in various real estate projects.

Upon Zayed's passing in 2004, Tahnoun's older brother, Khalifa, ascended to the leadership of Abu Dhabi and assumed the presidency of the UAE, while Mohamed, the most senior among the Bani Fatima siblings, was appointed crown prince. The remaining brothers were granted various formal titles, though their exact duties remained somewhat unclear.

Between 2008 and 2011, while working as a reporter in Abu Dhabi, I developed an interest in "sheikh watching," akin to the study of Soviet policies and practices but focused on Gulf royalty. This hobby involved analyzing official statements and actions closely and maintaining connections with those inside the royal palaces who would sometimes share confidential information. During this period, Tahnoun appeared to be an intriguing figure, seemingly distant from any real authority. He didn't hold any significant governmental position and appeared to be more concerned with expanding his wealth, exploring technology ventures, and transforming Abu Dhabi's cityscape.

Everything transformed when Tahnoun emerged as the family member most adept at utilizing a burgeoning instrument for nation-states: cyberespionage.

In July 2009, numerous BlackBerry owners in the UAE experienced their devices overheating severely. This issue was traced back to what was initially described as a “performance enhancement” update by Etisalat, the leading telecommunications service in the UAE. However, it was later revealed to be spyware—a preliminary attempt at widespread surveillance that failed dramatically after BlackBerry’s parent company unveiled the plot.

On a journey from Abu Dhabi to Dubai, I personally encountered a moment that opened my eyes to the UAE's covert authoritarian regime. Holding my BlackBerry to my ear, it was scorchingly hot, almost scalding my skin. This incident marked my first tangible experience with the underlying surveillance state of the UAE. However, the signs of its presence are noticeable to anyone who has spent significant time in the Gulf States. There's hardly any violent crime, and life appears serene and often opulent. Yet, in times of tension or danger, these nations can swiftly turn into perilous environments, particularly for those who even subtly challenge the status quo.

The Arab Spring uprisings in 2011, which led to the downfall of four Middle Eastern rulers due to large protests coordinated via Twitter, only intensified the determination of the UAE to suppress any emerging democratic movements. In 2011, when several activists from the UAE lightly pushed for political change and human rights, the government found them guilty of insulting the royalty. They were quickly forgiven and set free, only to be subjected to constant monitoring and intimidation thereafter.

Despite lacking proof of Tahnoun's direct participation in the BlackBerry incident, his subsequent role would see him at the helm of an organization with the capability for much more advanced espionage. By 2013, he had ascended to the position of deputy national security adviser, a period coinciding with the United Arab Emirates' efforts to intensify surveillance on both its citizens and adversaries on a massive scale.

For many years by that time, the UAE had been covertly operating a program dubbed Project Raven, which was initiated in 2008 through an agreement with consultant and ex-US counterterrorism chief Richard Clarke. The project received approval from the US National Security Agency, with the objective of providing the UAE with cutting-edge surveillance and data analysis tools to aid in counterterrorism efforts. However, around 2014, Project Raven shifted direction. Now under the leadership of an American firm named CyberPoint, the project began attracting numerous ex-US intelligence officials with an enticing offer: tax-exempt salaries, allowances for housing, and the opportunity to continue their battle against terrorism.

Combatting terrorism was actually just a portion of the overall plan. Within a span of two years, control of the project shifted once more, this time to a corporation known as Dark-Matter, essentially a firm owned by the Emirati government. Leadership within Emirati intelligence took Project Raven directly under their wing, situating it merely two floors away from the UAE’s counterpart to the NSA. This move sent a clear directive to the employees of Project Raven: they had to either sign on with DarkMatter or exit the project.

For the individuals who continued their work, their responsibilities involved monitoring reporters, activists, and anyone else considered a threat to the government or the royal family. Marc Baier, a former member of the NSA’s prestigious Tailored Access Operations unit, was among the prominent American experts who persisted in their roles with DarkMatter. Subsequent emails revealed Baier in discussions with the Italian cybersecurity company Hacking Team, where he referred to his UAE clients as being highly influential and insisted on VIP treatment while seeking out espionage software. Meanwhile, other ex-NSA cyber experts part of the Project Raven crew dedicated their efforts to crafting specialized cyber attacks tailored for certain devices and user accounts.

In 2016, authorities infiltrated the personal space of Ahmed Mansoor, a prominent figure advocating for democratic reforms in the UAE during the Arab Spring, by exploiting his child's baby monitor. Mansoor had become accustomed to odd occurrences with his electronic devices, including overheating phones, peculiar text messages, and unexplained withdrawals from his bank accounts, as shared by someone close to him. His phone had also been previously compromised by Pegasus, a notorious surveillance tool developed by the Israeli firm NSO Group. However, the breach involving his baby monitor marked a new invasion of his privacy. Unbeknownst to Mansoor, agents from DarkMatter were using this device to eavesdrop on intimate family discussions.

In a separate initiative, DarkMatter put together a specialized group it referred to as a “tiger team.” This team's mission was to deploy widespread surveillance equipment in public areas. According to an Italian cybersecurity expert who DarkMatter attempted to recruit in 2016, these devices would have the capability to intercept, alter, and reroute the local mobile network traffic in the UAE. “For these devices to function according to our expectations, they need to be installed throughout,” Simone Margaritelli, the candidate being pursued, was informed via email during the recruitment phase.

Who was in command of these operations? By the beginning of 2016, Tahnoun had taken up the role of national security adviser, thereby assuming full responsibility for the UAE's intelligence operations. Indications suggest that the entity ultimately directing DarkMatter's operations was, in fact, Tahnoun's own investment company, the Royal Group.

Over time, it seems I too fell into the crosshairs of the UAE's surveillance operations. In 2021, a group of journalists under the banner of the Pegasus Project revealed to me that in 2018, the UAE had attempted to infiltrate my phone using Pegasus spyware. This was during a period when I was investigating a worldwide financial controversy involving a figure from the Abu Dhabi royal family—Mansour, who is Sheikh Tahnoun’s sibling. The UAE, however, refuted claims of having singled out many of the individuals pointed out, myself included.

Tracking and hacking American nationals ultimately crossed a moral boundary for certain ex-intelligence operatives involved in Project Raven. "I find myself employed by a foreign intelligence entity that's focusing on US citizens," Lori Stroud, a whistleblower from Project Raven, revealed to Reuters in 2019. "I've essentially become the undesirable type of spy."

The subsequent controversy led to the indictment of multiple former NSA executives, Baier among them, by US authorities. In the aftermath, DarkMatter and Project Raven were meticulously dismantled, dispersed, underwent rebranding, and were absorbed into various companies and governmental agencies. A significant portion of their components and staff were consolidated into a newly established organization in 2018, known as G42.

G42 has openly refuted any links with DarkMatter, yet the connections are quite evident. For example, a subsidiary of DarkMatter, known for its close ties with Chinese firms, seemed to later integrate into G42. Moreover, Peng Xiao, who led this subsidiary, ascended to the position of CEO at G42.

Xiao, a fluent Chinese communicator who pursued a degree in computer science from Hawaii Pacific University, remains largely a mystery beyond these details. Previously a US citizen, he later traded his American nationality for that of the UAE, a highly uncommon feat for someone not originally from the Emirates. Working for a branch of G42 known as Pax AI, Xiao played a key role in advancing the heritage of DarkMatter into its next phase.

In 2019, a bright notification appeared on countless phones throughout the United Arab Emirates. ToTok, a newly launched messaging application, offered unfettered calling services, a feature that WhatsApp and other chat applications could not provide due to restrictions in the country. Rapidly, ToTok climbed the charts, becoming a top download not just in the UAE but also globally on both Apple and Google's app stores. However, there was a significant downside. By using the app, individuals unwittingly allowed it complete access to their device's contents, including photos, text messages, camera, voice calls, and even their location.

Millions of phone data entries were channeled to Pax AI. Previously, DarkMatter had also functioned out of the same premises as the intelligence services of the UAE. The creation of the ToTok app was a joint effort involving Chinese technical experts. For a government that had heavily invested in the NSO Group's Pegasus surveillance software and the cyber infiltration capabilities of DarkMatter, ToTok represented a straightforward approach. Instead of painstakingly selecting individuals for surveillance, users were voluntarily installing the software themselves.

Officials from ToTok strongly refuted claims that their application functioned as spyware. However, an engineer employed by G42 at the time shared with me that every piece of communication, including voice, video, and text messages, underwent analysis by artificial intelligence to detect what was deemed as suspicious activities by the government. One of the quickest ways to attract attention was to make calls to Qatar, which at the time was engaged in a cyber conflict with the UAE, from within the UAE itself. G42 chose not to provide specific comments on this matter but issued a general statement to WIRED, affirming, "G42 is deeply committed to the principles of responsible innovation, ethical governance, and the global advancement of AI technologies."

At G42, employees occasionally nickname Tahnoun "Tiger," and his directives can quickly alter the direction of the company. A past engineer recalls that Tiger once demanded the creation of either a $100 million revenue-generating business or a technology that would bring him fame. It's evident that the conglomerate is closely linked to the security apparatus, given that much of its tech and data operations are situated within Zayed Military City, an area with limited access. Furthermore, all employees at G42 must undergo security screenings before being employed.

Under the auspices of G42, alongside state intelligence agencies and various cybersecurity organizations, Tahnoun had essentially assumed command of the entire hacking operations within the UAE. However, there came a time when merely having authority over the nation's espionage infrastructure and its associated market did not satisfy Tahnoun's ambitions.

As the decade approached its end, Tahnoun was eyeing a greater role in the political landscape across the Emirates. His brother Mohamed had effectively been at the helm of the nation, stepping in for their brother, President Khalifa, who had been incapacitated by a significant stroke in 2014. With Khalifa’s health deteriorating and Mohamed's official rise to power on the horizon, the battle for the title of the next crown prince was underway.

Periods of uncertainty regarding succession can pose significant risks. In the case of Saudi Arabia, the lineage of Abdulaziz al-Saud, the nation's founder, has seen his sons ascend to the throne in succession since the 1950s. By the time Salman ascended to the throne in 2015 at the age of 80, there was a dense and complicated web of potential successors, marked by corruption and fraught with internal discord. It was against this backdrop in 2017 that King Salman's son, Mohammed, commonly referred to as MBS, took decisive action to consolidate his power. He did so by orchestrating a crackdown that targeted primarily his cousins and their close associates, effectively sidelining his competition and establishing himself as the predominant authority.

In Abu Dhabi, during discussions on who should succeed the throne, those close to the royal family reveal that Tahnoun advocated for the tradition that Zayed's sons should continue to govern as long as they were physically fit and mentally sharp. This stance positioned him as a potential candidate. However, Mohamed firmly believed that his son Khalid should be appointed as the crown prince, indicating to the nation's significant younger demographic that their interests were being considered at the highest levels of government.

For over a year, Tahnoun made his case, even showing proof that Mohamed's strategy went against their father's wishes for who should follow him. Eventually, the siblings reached an agreement. Tahnoun decided to give up his aspirations of becoming the crown prince or leader, in return for significant control over the nation's economic assets. This agreement eventually positioned him at the helm of managing $1.5 trillion in sovereign wealth.

In 2023, Tahnoun was appointed as the chairman of the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, the most significant sovereign wealth fund in the nation. A few weeks following this, Khalid was named the crown prince.

Formally, Tahnoun was slightly elevated in rank to serve as deputy ruler alongside his brother Hazza. However, individuals who have interacted with Abu Dhabi in recent years consistently report a significant expansion in Tahnoun's authority, extending beyond the realm of finance. He has assumed responsibility for diplomatic engagements with Iran, Qatar, and Israel, and at one point managed relations with the United States during a period of cooling ties with the Biden administration. “Tahnoun is the go-to person for challenging issues,” notes Kristian Coates Ulrichsen, a Gulf politics expert at Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy. According to Ulrichsen, this capability has substantially bolstered his influence.

Tahnoun has utilized newly acquired resources to expand his intricate network of investments and business entities. He presides over the Royal Group, which encompasses not only G42 but also the expansive International Holding Company. This latter entity, a significant conglomerate, provides employment for over 50,000 individuals and has a diverse portfolio that includes a copper mine in Zambia and the prestigious St. Regis golf club and island resort located in Abu Dhabi. Additionally, Tahnoun is at the helm of the First Abu Dhabi Bank, the premier banking institution in the UAE, and manages another colossal sovereign wealth fund known as ADQ.

Now, as Tahnoun's influence expands in the worldwide competition over artificial intelligence, his domain also encompasses a share in humanity's destiny.

In December, it was announced by the United States government that it had granted permission for certain Nvidia graphics processing units (GPUs) to be shipped to the United Arab Emirates, intended for a facility operated by Microsoft within the nation. Within G42, several branches have continued to expand: Space42 is dedicated to employing artificial intelligence for the examination of satellite imagery, while Core42 is set on establishing extensive AI data centers throughout the desert regions of Abu Dhabi.

Within the circles of US national security, there's a growing concern over the deepening ties between America's technological sector and the United Arab Emirates. A troubling revelation from a former security official highlighted that China's silence on the UAE's decision to dismantle all Huawei equipment and end its relationship with the firm in 2023 was peculiar. "They didn’t make any objections," the former official shared. This reaction starkly contrasts with China's response to Sweden's exclusion of Huawei and ZTE from its 5G network in 2020, which prompted vocal criticism from the Chinese government and led to significant losses for Sweden's Ericsson in the Chinese market. This indifferent stance from China regarding the UAE's shift away from Huawei, as seen through the lens of G42's split from China, hints at a possible secretive agreement between the UAE and China, the official speculated.

In comments made to WIRED, American lawmaker Michael McCaul repeated his worries about the potential for technology transfer to China via the UAE's agreement with Microsoft, emphasizing the importance of stricter safeguards. "Prior to moving forward with this collaboration and similar ones, the US needs to put in place strong, enforceable measures that are widely applicable to AI collaborations with the UAE," he stated.

Yet, even with such protective measures implemented, the UAE has demonstrated a knack for circumventing restrictions to achieve its objectives. This brings to mind the period in the early 2010s when top officials from Israel's NSO Group held briefings with reporters, confidently stating that their Pegasus spyware included protections to prevent misuse. They assured that clients of Pegasus, including the UAE, would be restricted from targeting phone numbers from the US and UK (such as my own). It also recalls the initial approval the NSA granted to Project Raven.

The expectation is that under Donald Trump's leadership, restrictions on exporting GPU chips will persist. However, individuals close to Tahnoun believe the new government may adopt a more lenient stance towards the United Arab Emirates' aspirations in artificial intelligence. Furthermore, there's a notable connection within Trump's circle to the UAE: Jared Kushner's private equity firm has received over $2 billion in contributions from the UAE, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia, securing the firm between $20 million and $30 million in yearly management fees. High-ranking officials from Abu Dhabi have sought advice from Kushner and other key figures from Trump's era, such as ex-Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, on AI strategy, as reported by those in the know.

The sustained availability of GPUs may still serve as a bargaining chip for the US, but its influence might diminish as competing processors advance. Certain experts contend that the effectiveness of export restrictions is overestimated by US policymakers. “AI doesn't resemble nuclear energy in terms of how you can limit access to essential components,” notes cybersecurity specialist Bruce Schneier. According to him, AI technology is widespread, and the notion that US firms hold a significant and definitive lead is illusory.

Tahnoun has effectively positioned himself as a pivotal investor in the forefront of the Artificial Intelligence sector, having been integrated into influential circles. This move not only grants him significant influence but also places him in a favorable position with entities that continuously seek financial backing from the UAE. During a World Government Summit the previous year, Sam Altman proposed that the UAE has the potential to act as a global "regulatory sandbox" for AI, offering a unique environment where innovative regulations for managing the technology could be developed, experimented with, and refined.

At present, the Middle East may be on the brink of a phase, reminiscent of the period following the Arab Spring, where traditional norms may no longer apply. With the rebel forces overtaking Syria, previously under the control of Bashar al Assad, nations in the Gulf, particularly the UAE, are expected to ramp up their surveillance efforts to prevent the spread of Islamist movements. "We are likely to witness an increase in oppressive measures and a greater reliance on surveillance technology," notes Karen Young, a distinguished fellow at the Middle East Institute in Washington. In the arena of addressing threats and mastering strategic maneuvers, Tahnoun is determined to ensure he's equipped with the most formidable apparatus available.

Share your thoughts on this piece by sending a letter to the editor via email at mail@wired.com.

The Wealth Issue

How Wealthy Males Dominate the Globe: An Editorial Note

Illustration: Charting Elon Musk's Realm

The Monarch of Ozempic Is Deeply Fearful

The Remarkable Downfall of a Solar Panel Sales Representative

Wealth Galore: Discover further insights in our exclusive edition here

Additional Content from WIRED

Evaluations and Manuals

© 2025 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. Purchases made through our website could result in WIRED receiving a commission, as we have affiliate agreements with certain retailers. It is prohibited to copy, share, send, or utilize the content found on this site in any manner without explicit consent from Condé Nast beforehand. Advertisement Choices

Choose a global website


Discover more from Automobilnews News - The first AI News Portal world wide

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

AI

Navigating the Future: How Magnetic AI Technology Could Safeguard GPS From Global Threats

Published

on

By

Magnetic Navigation Offers a Solution to GPS Vulnerabilities

High above us, clusters of satellites tirelessly operate to support the systems essential for the smooth operation of contemporary society. These systems, collectively referred to as the global navigation satellite system (GNSS), emit signals critical for the functioning of cellular networks, power distribution networks, online services, and GPS. However, the reliability of these systems is increasingly at risk.

GPS transmissions are vulnerable to being overwhelmed by stronger radio frequencies in a process known as jamming, as well as being deceived through the release of false signals, a tactic referred to as spoofing. Such disruptions to GPS functionality have been recorded in regions including Ukraine, the Middle East, and the South China Sea.

Startup SandboxAQ is of the opinion that integrating artificial intelligence with MagNav, navigation systems that utilize Earth's magnetic field, could offset the risks posed to GNSS. "Our innovation doesn't substitute [GNSS], but it enhances current navigation systems, boosting safety and acting as a backup main navigation option during GPS disruptions," states Luca Ferrara, the head of SandboxAQ's navigation unit.

The equipment for AQNav.

SandboxAQ's AQNav system employs quantum magnetometers, which are instruments capable of detecting minute variations in magnetic fields through observation of subatomic particles, to generate an analysis of the Earth's magnetic field. "Our goal is to identify the distinct signatures of magnetized geological structures within the Earth's crust," explains Ferrara.

Artificial intelligence is employed to precisely determine an aircraft's location by comparing it against established magnetic field maps. This AI technology also filters out any disturbances caused by the aircraft itself, including those from abrupt maneuvers or the aircraft's electrical components; each aircraft exhibits distinct patterns of magnetic disturbance.

Up to this point, the United States Air Force, along with companies Boeing and Airbus, have conducted trial runs with the technology in question. Ferrara notes, "From May 2023 onwards, we've rolled out and evaluated various versions of our equipment and programs." The AQNav system has covered hundreds of kilometers in flight, being installed in a range of planes from small, single-engine models to extensive military cargo planes. It has undergone practical testing conditions, notably during two significant military drills carried out by the US Air Force.

The concept and team behind SandboxAQ were cultivated at Alphabet, the parent organization of Google, during the period from 2016 to 2022. The foundational goal was to explore uses for artificial intelligence and quantum technologies that had been created in Google’s innovative lab known as the moonshot factory.

In 2022, SandboxAQ emerged as an independent entity from Alphabet, with founder and CEO Jack Hidary steering the company towards serving various industries in need of advanced AI technologies. According to Ferrara, the company's expertise extends beyond aerospace and navigation. "We're also seeing significant progress in life sciences, chemistry, materials science, financial services, cybernetics, among other fields," he notes.

SandboxAQ's AQNav installed on a C17 military plane.

Currently, the AQNav technology is not prepared for commercial release. The challenges remaining include its integration with current platforms and crafting a system that can reliably work on a worldwide basis. In particular, the software's dependability requires enhancement, and its signal-processing capabilities must be effective across diverse environmental settings. Moreover, the system has to meet global aviation regulations. "Given that AQNav is still in the developmental phase and hasn't reached the precision and accuracy of contemporary GNSS, it currently serves better as a safety mechanism for aviation, enhancing traditional navigation systems," Ferrara states.

Over time, he envisions that this technology will be extensively adopted for both military and civilian flight purposes. Recent findings from the International Air Transport Association and the European Union Agency for Aviation Safety highlight a significant rise in GPS disruptions and deceitful signals. “With the progression of aircraft automation, the susceptibility of GNSS to threats is expected to escalate. Hence, this innovation is considered crucial for enhancing current air safety and could potentially expand operational range in the future.” Industries related to maritime operations and drone production have indicated their requirements that could be satisfied through tailored versions of the AQNav. “Furthermore, the application of this technology in the automotive and railway sectors presents exciting opportunities to be investigated later on,” Ferrara remarks.

This narrative was first published in Wired Italia and has been converted from Italian.

Suggested for You…

Delivered to your email: Subscribe to Plaintext for deep insights on technology from Steven Levy.

Perhaps it's a good idea to consider clearing out aged conversation records.

Cash Galore: Explore our exclusive edition now

The antics surrounding memecoins are only beginning.

Mysterious Depths: A Behind-the-Scenes Exploration of Silicon Valley's Impact

Additional Content from WIRED

Insights and Tutorials

© 2025 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. Purchases made through our affiliate links may result in a commission for WIRED as part of our retailer partnership program. Reproduction, distribution, transmission, caching, or any form of usage of the material found on this website is strictly prohibited without explicit consent from Condé Nast. Ad Choices

Choose a global website


Discover more from Automobilnews News - The first AI News Portal world wide

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

AI

Revolutionizing the Future: The Top AI Innovations Transforming Our World, from Davinci-AI.de to AI-AllCreator.com and More

Published

on

By

TL;DR: Leading the forefront of technological innovation, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing various sectors with platforms like Davinci-Ai.de, showcasing creativity and problem-solving with deep learning neural networks and cognitive computing. AI-AllCreator.com leverages AI algorithms for versatile solutions in content creation and predictive analytics, while Bot.ai-Carsale.com transforms the automotive industry with autonomous systems and smart technology. These platforms highlight the top advancements in AI, including machine learning, data science, and robotics automation, demonstrating AI's potential in augmenting human capabilities, enhancing industries, and paving the way for a future powered by intelligent systems and big data.

In an era where the fusion of technology and intelligence is reshaping the boundaries of what's possible, Artificial Intelligence (AI) stands at the forefront of this revolutionary wave. Simulating human intelligence through advanced computer systems, AI has become the cornerstone of innovation, driving progress in fields as diverse as healthcare, finance, automotive, and beyond. From learning and reasoning to problem-solving and decision-making, AI's capabilities are not just enhancing but often surpassing traditional human tasks through its subfields including machine learning, natural language processing, computer vision, and robotics. This article delves into the heart of AI's transformative power, exploring the top AI innovations that are setting the stage for a future where technology is not just a tool but a partner in every aspect of human life. Our journey will take us from the groundbreaking platforms of Davinci-AI.de to the comprehensive solutions of AI-AllCreator.com, and beyond, uncovering how these and other AI technologies are revolutionizing industries. Whether it's through the precision of AI Algorithms, the insight of Predictive Analytics, the vast potential of Big Data, or the autonomy of Smart Technology, these innovations exemplify the pinnacle of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Neural Networks, Natural Language Processing, Robotics, Automation, Cognitive Computing, Data Science, Intelligent Systems, Computer Vision, Neural Networks, Augmented Intelligence, and more. Prepare to be amazed by the capabilities of bot.ai-carsale.com and how AI is making autonomous systems and smart technology more accessible and impactful than ever before. Through this exploration, it becomes clear that AI is not just changing the game; it's creating entirely new playing fields in Pattern Recognition, Speech Recognition, and beyond.

1. "Exploring the Top AI Innovations: From Davinci-AI.de to AI-AllCreator.com, and Beyond"

AI innovation bridge, humanity crossing future.

In the rapidly evolving world of technology, Artificial Intelligence (AI) stands at the forefront, driving innovations that once seemed confined to the realm of science fiction. Among these advancements, certain platforms and technologies have carved their names into the annals of AI development, showcasing the vast potential and versatility of AI. From the sophisticated algorithms of Davinci-Ai.de to the comprehensive solutions offered by AI-AllCreator.com, the landscape of AI innovation is both broad and deeply specialized.

Davinci-Ai.de represents the pinnacle of AI in creativity and complex problem-solving. Utilizing deep learning neural networks, this platform exemplifies how AI can mimic and even surpass human intelligence in areas such as pattern recognition, natural language processing, and cognitive computing. The technology behind Davinci-Ai.de leverages the latest in artificial intelligence machine learning, enabling it to tackle tasks that require a high degree of creativity and innovation, from generating art to devising novel business strategies.

On the other hand, AI-AllCreator.com serves as a testament to the versatility of AI applications across different sectors. This platform harnesses the power of AI algorithms to cater to a wide array of needs, from content creation to predictive analytics. It stands as a beacon of how AI can be an all-encompassing solution provider, integrating data science, intelligent systems, and robotics automation to deliver tailored outcomes that meet the specific demands of users.

Moreover, the emergence of specialized AI platforms such as Bot.ai-Carsale.com underscores the role of artificial intelligence in revolutionizing industries like the automotive sector. By employing autonomous systems and smart technology, Bot.ai-Carsale.com is pioneering the future of self-driving cars and AI-driven sales processes, showcasing the transformative potential of AI in making transportation safer, more efficient, and accessible.

These platforms are merely the tip of the iceberg in a sea of AI innovation. They highlight the extensive applications of AI, from augmented intelligence enhancing human capabilities to autonomous systems reshaping industries. As AI continues to evolve, integrating advanced neural networks, speech recognition, and computer vision, its impact is set to expand even further.

The journey from Davinci-Ai.de to AI-AllCreator.com and beyond is a vivid illustration of how artificial intelligence, machine learning, and robotics are not just reshaping our present but also charting the course for the future. With each advancement, AI is not only achieving new feats in automation and cognitive computing but also paving the way for smarter technology that understands, learns, and adapts. As we stand on the brink of this AI-driven era, the potential for innovation is limitless, promising a future where AI seamlessly integrates into every facet of human life, making it smarter, safer, and more efficient.

In conclusion, the landscape of artificial intelligence (AI) is continuously evolving, pushing the boundaries of what machines can do and how they can augment human capabilities. From the innovative strides made by Davinci-AI.de in cognitive computing to the advanced solutions offered by AI-AllCreator.com, and not forgetting the niche advancements in sectors like automotive sales through bot.ai-carsale.com, AI's influence spans a broad spectrum. These platforms and technologies represent just the tip of the iceberg in a sea of AI innovations that include machine learning, deep learning neural networks, natural language processing, robotics, automation, and more. The integration of AI into various industries, from healthcare with its predictive analytics and medical diagnosis capabilities to finance with its big data analysis and financial forecasting, showcases the versatile and transformative power of artificial intelligence.

As we continue to explore and expand the capabilities of AI, we pave the way for a future where autonomous systems, smart technology, and intelligent systems become the norm rather than the exception. The potential for AI to revolutionize industries, enhance our decision-making processes, and improve our quality of life is immense. However, it also necessitates a thoughtful approach to the development and deployment of AI technologies, ensuring they are used ethically and responsibly. By harnessing the top AI innovations while being mindful of their implications, we can steer towards a future where AI not only augments human intelligence but also enriches human experience. The journey from Davinci-AI.de to AI-AllCreator.com and beyond is just the beginning of this exciting and uncharted voyage into the realms of artificial intelligence.


Discover more from Automobilnews News - The first AI News Portal world wide

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

AI

Elon Musk’s Empire Expands: From Texas to Mars and the Influence of Wealth in Tech’s New Age

Published

on

By

Charting Elon Musk's Worldwide Dominion

Elon's Presence in Texas

Outer Space Endeavors

Share your opinions on this piece with us. Send a letter to the editor via email at mail@wired.com.

The Wealth Issue

How Wealthy Men Dominate Global Affairs: An Editorial Introduction

Illustration: Charting the Domain of Elon Musk

The Monarch of Ozempic Is Deeply Frightened

The Remarkable Downfall of a Solar Panel Sales Representative

Wealth Galore: Explore further in our exclusive feature here

Additional Content from WIRED

Evaluations and Manuals

© 2025 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. Purchases made through our website may generate revenue for WIRED as part of our affiliate agreements with retail partners. It's prohibited to copy, distribute, broadcast, store, or use the content found on this site in any way without explicit authorization from Condé Nast. Advertisement Options

Choose a global website


Discover more from Automobilnews News - The first AI News Portal world wide

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

AI

AI Financial Advisers: Navigating the Tightrope Between Aid and Upsell for the Paycheck-to-Paycheck Generation

Published

on

By

AI-Powered Financial Guidance Aims at the Young and Financially Strapped

Executives at AI firms frequently entice users (and backers) with visions of a future where AI mentors, equipped with insights from personal data and previous exchanges, assist individuals in reaching their grandest aspirations. Dreaming of a fitter lifestyle? An AI-crafted exercise plan is at your service. Looking to keep an eye on your health over time? There's an AI wellness application for you. Hoping to resolve financial difficulties? You have access to a variety of personal finance chatbots designed to help.

I aim to eliminate all my debts by the close of 2025, and in my role as a journalist frequently exploring new technologies, I became interested in experimenting with some of the AI-powered financial guidance applications that have become trendy lately. Opting for a personal financial advisor can be quite pricey, often running into the thousands, which is why an increasing number of individuals, particularly the younger demographic, are opting for AI-driven solutions for financial counsel. From the list of popular free finance applications on Apple's platform, I chose to test out two highly praised services that utilize chatbots designed to address financial difficulties: Cleo AI and Bright.

Cleo AI and Bright both recommend that users link their bank accounts via a third-party provider known as Plaid. This integration enables the chatbots to analyze spending patterns, assist in debt repayment, and facilitate credit improvement. "By leveraging your banking information and your interactions with us, Cleo aims to act as your advisor or mentor," explains Barney Hussey-Yeo, the CEO and founder of the company. "She's designed to offer pertinent advice and suitable financial products to enhance your financial decision-making."

Understandably, however, the advice provided by Cleo occasionally strayed off course. Despite having its captivating instances, such as a friendly critique pinpointing my excessive spending in non-essential areas, the AI tool appeared to be primarily focused on leveraging my personal information to suggest additional purchases. Bright exhibited similar behavior.

In an instance, I initiated a dialogue feigning melancholy due to insufficient funds for purchasing food essentials. Hussey-Yeo points out that Cleo primarily serves a younger audience who often find themselves barely making ends meet and experiencing significant financial distress more than the average person. Given this context, I assumed such topics were commonly discussed among users. The bot simulated compassion and quickly suggested I explore the possibility of securing a cash advance via the application.

Once Cleo confirmed I qualified for a cash advance, I was encouraged to enroll in a Cleo Plus membership, which costs $6 monthly. During my initial experience, the app allowed me to access a cash advance of up to $130, provided in two installments of $65 each over a span of two days. Although there is no mandatory fee for this advance if users opt to receive their funds within an estimated three to four business days, this waiting period can be challenging for individuals who rely on each paycheck to make ends meet and may divert attention from objectives like settling past debts.

Cleo proposed that I could receive the funds on the same day if I was willing to cover an express charge of $8. Consequently, this arrangement would require me to repay $73 approximately a week later for the cash advance. Initially, I decided against proceeding with the transaction, and in response, the app increased my credit limit to $200 the following day, divided into two portions of $100 each. Hussey-Yeo mentioned that cash advances contribute to about a third of Cleo’s earnings, with the rest coming from memberships and a specially designed card that aids individuals in improving their credit ratings. In the end, interacting with Cleo seemed more like it was encouraging me towards taking on more short-term financial obligations, instead of providing a genuine solution to my financial challenges.

Presently, the Cleo application does not provide options for securing bigger loans, however, the financial chatbot from Bright, advertised as an "AI debt manager," offers this capability. Subscribing to Bright's AI service is pricier, requiring $39 for a three-month period, yet it grants the possibility of obtaining larger sums of money, with the potential to secure up to $10,000 via external lenders. In contrast to another AI financial chatbot I evaluated, I found Bright's responses to include more perplexing mistakes, such as incorrectly stating that I incurred over $7,000 in fees for insufficient funds within the last month, which is a grossly inaccurate figure.

Every time I interacted with the Bright application, it appeared to steer me towards an external service, notably via the "For you" buttons situated at the chatbot's base. Here, half of the auto-generated suggestions revolved around obtaining immediate money. A loan proposition presented to me via an external financier was set at $3,900, carrying an annual interest rate fluctuating from 160 percent to 195 percent. Attempts to reach Bright for a response through both telephone and email went unanswered.

Hussey-Yeo views his AI assistant as a key player in maintaining user interest and fostering ongoing engagement, seeing significant potential for converting free users into paying customers. He believes in the inherent value of monetizing financial services, much like traditional banking institutions and modern fintech companies do. “The bulk of the upselling and user interaction is driven by the AI assistant,” he explains. For instance, if someone’s credit rating drops, the assistant might suggest services to help improve it. Similarly, if a user is at risk of overdrawing their account and facing a $35 fee, it could offer an option for early wage access (EWA), which allows employees to receive a portion of their earnings before the usual payday, sometimes for an additional fee for expedited service.

After initially concentrating on the European market following its 2016 debut, Hussey-Yeo has now turned his efforts towards enhancing his application's popularity in the U.S. and broadening the range of financial services available via the chatbot. He points out that according to a bleak study by LendingClub in 2023, 60% of Americans are managing their finances from one paycheck to the next. "Therefore, our primary target is the Gen Z and millennial demographic, although we aim to expand our reach beyond that group as well," he explains.

Through interacting with these two AI finance chatbots, I caught a glimpse of what future AI tools could offer, especially in terms of personalized experiences. However, this promise of bespoke customization is not without its drawbacks. An AI that has an in-depth understanding of my financial habits could be incredibly effective in managing my expenses and encouraging more prudent financial reflection. Yet, this same tool could also exploit my financial vulnerabilities, such as recognizing moments when I'm desperate enough to pay an additional $9 to receive $100 immediately. This raises concerns about the reliability of an AI advisor that benefits financially from its recommendations.

The Wealth Issue

The Dominance of Affluent Males in Global Leadership: An Editorial Note

Illustration: Charting the Domain of Elon Musk

The Monarch of Ozempic Is Deeply Frightened

The Dramatic Collapse of a Solar Panel Sales Representative

Cash, Cash, Cash: Explore further in our exclusive edition here

Additional Content from WIRED

Critiques and Manuals

© 2025 Condé Nast. All rights are held by the publisher. WIRED might receive a share of revenue from the sale of goods bought via our website, as a component of our Affiliate Agreements with retail partners. The content of this site is protected and may not be copied, shared, broadcast, stored, or utilized in any form without the explicit written consent of Condé Nast. Choices in Advertising.

Choose a global location


Discover more from Automobilnews News - The first AI News Portal world wide

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

AI

Patriarchy and Power: Unpacking the Gender Dynamics of Wealth in the Tech World

Published

on

By

Wealthy Individuals Dominate Globally

Every time I land a new position, my immediate action is to inform my father. His initial inquiry always revolves around my salary. This fascination with financial figures is well-known within the Drummond clan. However, his keen focus on my earnings is not without merit: After all, financial resources control the globe, irrespective of one's personal wealth. Thus, Mr. Drummond believes it's wise to aim for the highest income possible.

Setting aside my personal financial quirks, it's no secret that WIRED has a deep fascination with finance, given its coverage of a sector drowning in trillions of dollars—a sector that is, incidentally, redefining our everyday lives. But the question remains: Who actually controls this wealth? In what ways are they utilizing it? And what implications does this have for the rest of us? To unearth the answers, we sent our financially astute WIRED journalists to various corners of the globe. From the opulence of the United Arab Emirates to the economic model of Denmark, from the political corridors of Washington, DC, to the sunny shores of Florida, our aim was to gather and share stories that encapsulate the dynamics of wealth and power worldwide, as only WIRED can.

At last, our editorial team gathered to evaluate our content selection. During our review of articles and visual aids, we made a striking observation. It didn't matter where our journalists were dispatched or which segment of the tech realm we delved into, the individuals controlling the vast wealth were universally male. Every single one of them. Bill Gates, for instance, who shared insights on his upcoming autobiography with Steven Levy (more on that soon), has dominated the list of the world’s wealthiest individuals for 19 out of the last 30 years. Within the circle of around 30 cryptocurrency investors close to Trump, every single one is—prepare yourself—male. Similarly, the energetic young men going door-to-door in Florida, peddling solar panels in hopes of striking it rich by their 30s, are all male.

Allow me to highlight a notable point: This edition contains a significantly higher level of testosterone than the combined total of the last ten years' worth of People Magazine's Sexiest Man Alive issues. This is partly due to the current situation: a whopping 87 percent of the world's billionaires are male, and the disparity between men and women in leadership roles within the technology sector remains stark and significantly unfair. This doesn't even begin to touch on the issues of racial diversity, which only adds to the grim reality. This trend shows no signs of slowing down, especially as major technology companies like Meta and Google reduce their diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts. At the same time, the online male-dominated spaces, now more than ever fueled by former President Trump and his close associate Musk, are rapidly expanding their reach and influence.

I acknowledge our responsibility as well. At WIRED, we missed the mark by not recognizing the glaring, continuous display of masculinity throughout our pages until it was too late. We failed to question the complex and broken gender dynamics involved in accumulating wealth, wielding corporate power, and holding authority early on in our editorial process. These realms frustratingly remain dominated almost entirely by individuals who are male, possess deep, commanding voices, and have the advantage of centuries of precedence.

Let me be clear: This edition, whether you're flipping through the pages or scrolling online, is sure to capture your interest. We aim to enlighten you on the accumulation and expenditure of substantial wealth in the technology sector, particularly by the individuals—the gentlemen—behind these financial movements. However, as a leading lady addressing all the gentlemen out there, including those highlighted within our publication: While it may currently seem like a realm dominated by affluent men, rest assured, women have an affinity for wealth as well. And, believe me, we're on our way to claim our share.

Share your opinions on this piece with us. Send your feedback to the editor via email at mail@wired.com.

The Wealth Issue

The Dominance of Affluent Men: An Editorial Note

Illustration: Charting the Realm of Elon Musk

The Monarch of Ozempic Is Deeply Frightened

The Remarkable Downfall of a Solar Panel Sales Representative

Wealth Galore: Discover additional insights in our exclusive feature

Additional Insights from WIRED

Evaluations and Tutorials

© 2025 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. WIRED might receive a share of revenue from items bought via our website, thanks to our affiliate collaborations with various retailers. Content from this site is not to be copied, shared, broadcasted, stored, or utilized in any form without explicit written consent from Condé Nast. Advertising Choices

Choose a global website


Discover more from Automobilnews News - The first AI News Portal world wide

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE

Advertisement
F123 minutes ago

Hamilton Mania Swells as Seven-Time Champion Prepares for Historic Ferrari Debut in Maranello

F143 minutes ago

Verstappen Camp Dismiss Aston Martin Rumors with Icy Response Amid F1 Speculation

Automakers & Suppliers1 hour ago

Revving Up the Future: Lamborghini’s High-Performance Supercars and Their Impact on the Italian Luxury Vehicle Market

Automakers & Suppliers2 hours ago

Electrifying Evolution: 2024 Porsche Macan Turbo Electric Balances Power and Precision Amidst the Challenges of Weight

F13 hours ago

Liam Lawson Faces High-Stakes Test Against Max Verstappen: Proving Mental Fortitude at Red Bull in 2025

Moto GP3 hours ago

Ducati’s Dream Duo: Marquez and Bagnaia Revive Rossi-Lorenzo’s Legendary Line-Up

Moto GP5 hours ago

Jorge Martin’s Mental Mastery: Can His ‘Key of Life’ Unlock Aprilia’s First MotoGP Title?

F15 hours ago

Aston Martin’s Path to F1 Glory: Andy Cowell’s Vision for a Reshaped Leadership Ahead of 2025

F16 hours ago

Aston Martin’s Development Struggles: Andy Cowell’s Candid Reflection on F1 Setbacks and Future Ambitions

F16 hours ago

Helmut Marko’s Regret: The Nyck De Vries Decision and Red Bull’s Path Forward in F1

Moto GP7 hours ago

Romano Albesiano Joins HRC’s New Era: Aleix Espargaro Unveils 2025 Honda at Exclusive Buriram Test

AI8 hours ago

Biden’s Eleventh-Hour Cybersecurity Overhaul: A Bold Move to Fortify Digital Defenses, AI Integration, and Hacker Accountability

AI8 hours ago

Biden’s Eleventh-Hour Cybersecurity Overhaul: A Bold Leap into AI Defense and Digital Identity Before Trump’s Return

Moto GP8 hours ago

Revving Up Consistency: Aprilia’s Braking Breakthrough and the Quest for MotoGP Supremacy

AI8 hours ago

GitHub’s Battle Against Deepfake Porn: A Policy in Crisis

AI9 hours ago

AI at Your Service: Navigating the New Frontier of Personal Assistants

Politics9 hours ago

Keir Starmer Secures Century-Long UK-Ukraine Partnership Amid Rising Tensions and Trump’s Impending Presidency

F19 hours ago

Revving Up Ferrari: Lewis Hamilton Poised to Ignite a New Era of Championship Glory

AI3 months ago

News Giants Wage Legal Battle Against AI Startup Perplexity for ‘Hallucinating’ Fake News Content

Tech2 months ago

Revolutionizing the Road: Top Automotive Technology Innovations Fueling Electric Mobility and Autonomous Driving

Tech1 month ago

Revving Up the Future: How Top Automotive Technology Innovations Are Paving the Way for Sustainability and Safety on the Road

Tech1 month ago

Driving into the Future: Top Automotive Technology Innovations Transforming Vehicles and Road Safety

Tech1 month ago

Revving Up Innovation: How Top Automotive Technology is Driving Us Towards a Sustainable and Connected Future

Tech3 months ago

Revving Up Innovation: How Top Automotive Technology is Shaping an Electrified, Autonomous, and Connected Future on the Road

Tech3 months ago

Revving Up the Future: How Top Automotive Technology Innovations are Accelerating Sustainability and Connectivity on the Road

Tech3 months ago

Revving Up Innovation: Exploring Top Automotive Technology Trends in Electric Mobility and Autonomous Driving

Tech3 months ago

Revving Up the Future: How Top Automotive Technology is Paving the Way for Electric Mobility and Self-Driving Cars

Tech3 months ago

Revving Up the Future: How Top Automotive Technology Innovations Are Paving the Way for Electric Mobility and Self-Driving Cars

Tech3 months ago

Driving into the Future: The Top Automotive Technology Innovations Fueling Electric Mobility and Autonomous Revolution

AI3 months ago

Google’s NotebookLM Revolutionizes AI Podcasts with Customizable Conversations: A Deep Dive into Kafka’s Metamorphosis and Beyond

Tech2 months ago

Driving Innovation: The Top Automotive Technology Trends Fueling the Future of Electric Mobility and Autonomous Vehicles

Tech2 months ago

Revving Up Innovation: How Top Automotive Technology Trends Are Shaping the Electric and Autonomous Era

Tech2 months ago

Revving Up the Future: The Top Automotive Technology Innovations Driving Us Towards an Electrified, Autonomous Era

Tech2 months ago

Revving Up the Future: Top Automotive Technologies Fueling Sustainability and Connectivity on the Road

Tech2 months ago

Revving Up the Future: The Top Automotive Technology Innovations Driving Us Towards a Sustainable and Smart Mobility Era

Tech2 months ago

Revolutionizing the Road: Top Automotive Technology Innovations Driving Us Towards an Electric, Autonomous Era

V12 AI REVOLUTION COMMING SOON !

Get ready for a groundbreaking shift in the world of artificial intelligence as the V12 AI Revolution is on the horizon

SPORT NEWS

Business NEWS

Advertisement

POLITCS NEWS

Trending

Chatten Sie mit uns

Hallo! Wie kann ich Ihnen helfen?

Discover more from Automobilnews News - The first AI News Portal world wide

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

×