Unpacking the Red Bull ‘Bib’ Saga: Key Questions Answered on the US Grand Prix Controversy

Eight Crucial Inquiries Addressed Regarding the Red Bull Car Debate at the US Grand Prix

Clarifying All Known Details About the Red Bull 'Bib' Controversy in Texas

After discussions with the FIA, Red Bull consented to modify their RB20 before the upcoming Formula 1 United States Grand Prix this weekend.

Below are the main questions addressed regarding the technical dispute in Texas.

Sign up for our F1 Newsletter

Receive the most recent F1 updates, exclusive content, interviews, and special offers from the paddock straight to your email.

To learn more, please refer to our Privacy Policy

What sparked the controversy?

Formula 1 teams raised concerns after discovering that an unidentified competitor was utilizing a method to adjust the elevation of its T-tray. This information allegedly came to light through open-access FIA servers following the Singapore Grand Prix.

It was revealed that Red Bull was the reason for the worry.

What regulations permit?

All Formula 1 vehicles are placed in parc ferme from the end of qualifying until the start of the race. Significant adjustments to the setup are prohibited. However, modifications can be made to the front wing using the parts that are already available.

There is no indication that Red Bull violated any regulations.

How did Red Bull react?

The Formula 1 constructors' champions acknowledged the presence of the 'T-tray' or 'bib,' stating: "Indeed, it is part of the car, but it cannot be accessed when the vehicle is completely put together and prepared for operation."

In our frequent communications with the FIA, this issue was discussed, and we have devised a plan for the future.

Essentially, Red Bull acknowledged that the device exists but maintains that they cannot use it in any manner that would violate regulations.

Red Bull and the FIA have reached a consensus on modifications.

Has the FIA implemented any alterations?

A statement from the FIA clarified: "Modifying the front bib clearance while the car is in parc ferme is entirely banned according to the rules."

"Although we have not been informed of any team using this kind of system, the FIA continues to be alert as we work to improve the sport's regulation."

"In line with this, we have made changes to our procedures to guarantee that the clearance of the front bib cannot be altered without difficulty."

"In certain situations, applying a seal might be necessary to offer additional confirmation of adherence."

Why does ride height matter?

Formula 1 teams aim to keep their cars as close to the ground as they can. However, this requires careful adjustment. If the car is set too low, it risks harming the underside plank and losing the desired performance boost.

Reducing the car's height is crucial during qualifying since the focus is on achieving the fastest lap time. However, during the grand prix, teams opt to elevate the car for several different purposes.

This indicates that since modifications are not allowed from the qualifying stage to the grand prix, teams need to determine the ideal setup in advance.

Is there discontent at McLaren?

Lando Norris of McLaren trails Red Bull's Max Verstappen by 52 points in the race for the Formula 1 championship.

Norris mentioned that if the tool has indeed been benefiting them, and they have been using it as people suspect, perhaps the advantage will move towards us.

However, when discussing such matters, they would not have achieved multiple pole positions or victories due to that device.

"I doubt it will make a significant difference overall. In specific qualifying sessions where the times are separated by mere hundredths or thousandths of a second, one might argue that it could have influenced the outcome in one way or another."

Was the gadget beneficial for Red Bull's performance?

Max Verstappen, the leading driver for Red Bull, asserted that the gadget does not influence performance.

He pointed out accurately that other F1 teams could access the device details through the FIA servers. He argued that this demonstrates Red Bull was not trying to gain an unfair edge.

Verstappen remarked that the information is publicly accessible, allowing everyone to view it.

"For us, it served as a convenient tool for making adjustments when the components were separate. However, once the car is fully assembled, making changes becomes impossible. Therefore, it doesn’t alter anything for us…"

As I went through the text, I questioned whether other teams were involved in similar practices. Upon further investigation, I discovered it pertained to our own team. It was never brought up in our meetings, making it simply a more convenient tool for making adjustments.

Did Lewis Hamilton stand up for Red Bull?

Hamilton expressed to Sky Sports F1, "Innovation is at the heart of our sport."

"Red Bull has taken the lead and introduced new ideas."

"In the end, every team examines the regulations closely and seeks ways to interpret them to their advantage, even if that means pushing the boundaries slightly."

"It's essential to keep improving and enhance oversight."

"Ultimately, they performed more effectively. Who knows how long they've been benefiting from that, as it has contributed to their championship victories. Perhaps this marks an end to that trend… However, I doubt that this alone will be enough to halt their success."

Explore Further

Join Our F1 Newsletter

Receive the newest updates, exclusive content, interviews, and special offers from the F1 paddock straight in your email.

For further details, please refer to our Privacy Policy

Recent Updates

Additional Updates

Website Map

Crash.Net

©1999-2024 Crash Media Group

It is prohibited to fully or partially copy text, images, or drawings in any format.