Press conference for this week's full assembly

Distribute this information:

Today at 2:30 PM, representatives for the European Parliament will conduct a final briefing regarding the plenary session scheduled for November 13th and 14th.

Date and Time: Wednesday, November 13th at 2

Location: Anna Politkovskaya Press Room in Brussels and through Interactio

The main subjects covered in this plenary session are:

English and French translations of the press briefing will be offered.

Journalists who want to engage and pose questions should join through Interactio by accessing this link: https://ep.interactio.eu/uw5m-71vf-mi2k

The event will be broadcasted live starting at 14:30 on Wednesday, available either in the Anna Politkovskaya press room within Parliament or through Parliament's webstreaming service and EbS+.

Media Advisory – Submit Questions via Interactio

Interactio can be accessed on an iPad using Safari, as well as on Mac and Windows computers through Google Chrome.

While logging in, please fill in the fields for first name and last name with your name and the media outlet you represent.

To enhance audio clarity, it is recommended to utilize both headphones and a microphone. Video is essential for interpreting any contributions.

Reporters unfamiliar with Interactio are requested to log in half an hour prior to the press event to conduct a connection test. Technical support is available if needed.

Once you are connected, access the chat window located in the upper right corner to view the service messages.

For additional information, please review the guidelines and advice provided for remote presenters regarding connectivity.

Connections:

Delphine COLARD

Neil CORLETT

Details about the product

Distribute this page:

Updates

The Parliament in your nation

Resources

Leader of the European Parliament

European Parliament

Parliament's presence on social platforms

Reference links

EP TODAY

Spread the word:

Wednesday, November 13

The relationship between the European Union and the United States following Donald Trump's election as president.

After the United States' presidential election, Members of the European Parliament will engage in discussions with the European Commission concerning the future of EU-US relations under the newly elected administration. The debate is scheduled to begin at approximately 4:30 PM. During this session, MEPs are anticipated to address various topics, including assistance to Ukraine, interactions with Russia and China, the ongoing Middle East crisis, military collaboration, trade issues, and climate change concerns.

Snjezana Kobescak Smodis

Phone number: +32 470 96 08

EP_ForeignAffairs

Valencia Flood Catastrophe: European Parliament Members Deliberate on Prevention Measures and Union Assistance

After devastating floods in Spain that resulted in the deaths of at least 223 people, a debate on enhancing the EU’s capability to withstand severe weather and aid disaster victims will follow the session's commencement at 3 p.m. Members of the European Parliament will begin by honoring the victims, followed by a discussion with the European Commission. Political parties have concurred to include this issue on the agenda, awaiting final approval from the entire assembly at the session's start.

Estefania Narrillos

Phone number: +32 498 98 39 85

Press Release from the European Parliament

COP29: European Parliament Members Discuss Stance Before International Climate Talks

Starting at approximately 6 PM, members of the European Parliament will deliberate on their expectations for the 2024 United Nations Climate Change Conference, known as COP29. A decision on a resolution is scheduled for tomorrow. In the proposed document, these parliamentarians urge all nations to settle on a new collective climate finance target for the period after 2025. They also advocate for the swift elimination of both direct and indirect subsidies for fossil fuels, suggesting that these funds should instead be redirected to support climate initiatives.

POPP Dana

(32) 470-951-707

Environment_EP

In summary

Violence in Amsterdam. Tonight, Members of the European Parliament will discuss the troubling increase in aggression surrounding a football game in the Netherlands and the intolerable assaults on Israeli supporters. Political factions have consented to include this issue in the schedule, subject to approval by the entire chamber at the start of the session.

In the evening session, members of the European Parliament are set to engage in discussions with the European Commission on enhancing strategies to combat money laundering and the funding of terrorism. Additionally, they will consider the proposal to categorize Russia as a high-risk third country within the European Union.

Georgia. During a nighttime debate, Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) are set to discuss the results of Georgia's controversial parliamentary elections, which have reportedly been influenced by Russia. Political factions have concurred on incorporating this issue into the agenda, awaiting approval by the entire assembly at the start of the session.

You can watch the live broadcast of the plenary session on Parliament's web streaming service and on EbS+.

For comprehensive details about the session, we recommend checking our newsletter.

Details about the plenary session are available at this location.

Contact Details:

Media Center

Details about the Product

Distribute this Page:

Latest Updates

The Parliament in Your Nation

Resources

Leader of the European Parliament

European Legislative Body

Parliamentary Presence on Social Platforms

Resource Connections

Legislators Honor Spanish Flood Victims

Distribute this information:

At the start of the plenary session held on November 13-14 in Brussels, President Metsola led a moment of silence to honor those who lost their lives in the recent flood disaster in Spain.

In the wake of catastrophic flooding that ravaged communities in Valencia and various areas of Spain two weeks ago, resulting in the loss of at least 223 lives, President Metsola guided Members of the European Parliament in observing a minute of silence to pay tribute to the victims. She expressed that Europe is both shocked and grieving, and emphasized that the European Union is prepared to offer assistance in every possible manner during the recovery and reconstruction efforts, which includes providing greater flexibility to expedite financial aid.

Alterations to the schedule

Mid

The agenda has been adjusted to eliminate the European Council and Commission statements regarding the conclusions from their meetings in October and November 2024. This change is due to the unavailability of Charles Michel, the President of the European Council.

A report from the Commission regarding the severe flooding in Spain, the pressing requirement to aid those affected, enhance readiness, and combat the climate crisis has been prioritized as the first topic on Wednesday's schedule.

The European Council and Commission have merged their comments regarding EU-US relations following the results of the US presidential elections into a single statement from the Commission.

A report from the Commission regarding Georgia's escalating democratic issues after the latest parliamentary elections and claims of vote manipulation has been included in the agenda. Members of the European Parliament have decided to conclude the discussion with a resolution that will be voted on in the next session.

A statement from the Commission concerning the troubling rise in violence surrounding the football match in the Netherlands, along with the intolerable assaults on Israeli football supporters, has been included as the fifth item.

Day

In accordance with Rule 170 (5), two urgent procedure requests have been included in the voting agenda for these legislative files:

The meeting will continue until 10:00 PM.

Corrections

According to Rule 251(4) of the EP Rules of Procedure, two corrections will automatically be accepted unless a political group or a sufficient number of Members, meeting the minimum required threshold, ask for a vote on the matter. The pertinent list is available on the plenary's website.

Contact Persons:

Estefanía Narrillos

Andreas Kleiner

Eoghan Walsh

Additional Details

Product Details

Distribute this page:

Updates

National Parliament Connections

Resources

Leader of the European Parliament

European Legislative Body

Parliamentary Social Media Presence

Reference Links

The report recommends banning heckling in parliament to dismantle the 'old boy's club' atmosphere, and proposes exploring the possibility of MPs sharing roles to boost female participation in politics.

Political correspondent @Journoamrogers

Tuesday, November 12, 2024, 09:

A report has recommended prohibiting booing and jeering in the House of Commons to foster a more "respectful" atmosphere.

The concept of job sharing for Members of Parliament, in which a constituency is represented by two individuals rather than just one, ought to be explored as a means to facilitate the election of more women into parliament.

In the 2024 general election, the House of Commons saw a record number of women elected, with 263 out of 650 MPs being female. This 40% representation is the highest to date, yet still falls short of the 51% required to match the national gender ratio.

The study conducted by 50:50 Parliament and Compassion in Politics advocates for a significant overhaul of Westminster's prevailing atmosphere, which it compares to a "old boys club" characterized by frequent abuse and intimidation.

The article described Prime Minister's Questions, a weekly event where the prime minister faces inquiries from the opposition leader, as akin to a "school playground." It suggested that this atmosphere diminishes the stature of Members of Parliament and could deter individuals from engaging with politics.

The article stated that implementing an instant prohibition on booing and jeering could serve as a powerful symbol and set a positive standard of conduct for the community.

Job sharing among Members of Parliament, a concept earlier proposed by the Green Party and ex-Labour MP John McDonnell, would promote better work-life balance.

Latest in Politics: Prime Minister does not intend to hold talks with Taliban during environmental conference.

Recent reports from Sky News reveal that newly elected members of parliament are facing difficulties in establishing constituency offices, influenced by concerns over security and rising rental costs.

Multiple Members of Parliament have expressed to Sky News that they feel landlords are hesitant to rent to them because of the potential dangers associated with their roles, such as the threat of protests and vandalism.

Stay informed on current events from the UK and globally by tuning into Sky News.

They expressed that this made them feel less capable of being present and recognizable to the people in their communities and to those they represent.

The study, endorsed by ex-home secretary Amber Rudd and Labour's previous communications chief Alastair Campbell, involved distributing a survey to 132 MPs who did not seek re-election in the most recent vote. Of these, only 24 provided responses.

Among the respondents, one third indicated that the amount of abuse they endured while serving as an MP influenced their decision to step down, while another third pointed to the negative effects the position had on their mental health as a reason for their resignation.

More than half indicated they had to resign due to the job's negative effects on their family life, which included concerns about their own safety, the safety of their family, and that of others.

A previous member of parliament and minister confided to researchers that they experienced a nervous breakdown while serving in parliament.

"They described it as the most intense experience they've ever had."

"The peaks are exhilarating, while the troughs are excruciating. There's hardly any middle ground. The decline in public esteem renders the position untenable for both the MP and their relatives. Following my campaign, and later during my tenure as minister, I suffered from nervous breakdowns."

A different ex-MP characterized the parliament as a "rampant playground of misconduct".

Parliament continues to operate as though it were an exclusive men's club, yet the ethical norms once held by gentlemen of the 19th century have vanished.

"Bullying and manipulation have become normalized and anticipated behaviors. Additionally, an excessive number of employees are picking up negative practices such as consuming alcohol on the job. The entire palace is chaotic and stands as the most disheartening workplace I have ever experienced."

The report also suggests implementing a prohibition on dishonesty within parliamentary proceedings as a strategy to enhance the credibility of politicians among the public, which it notes is extremely low.

Stay ahead with the latest breaking news updates.

Download the Sky News application at no cost

Discover more: Labor accused of being 'obsessed with class conflict' regarding VAT proposals; Farmers might blockade harbors and hinder food distribution.

The article referred to several controversies that have negatively influenced how politicians are viewed by the public, such as the partygate incident, the 2010 expenses scandal, and various cases involving MPs who have been alleged or convicted of sexual misconduct or accused of bullying, harassment, and intimidation.

In recent times, the Labour Party has been embroiled in controversies surrounding perks, resulting in a slim lead of only one point over the Conservatives, as indicated by a survey released last month.

The study further recommended reevaluating the parliamentary whipping system, which is used to coax and convince MPs to vote in accordance with party directives and adhere to commands from leadership, in order to eliminate bullying.

The document will be presented to the parliamentary committee on modernisation, an entity established as per the commitments in Labour's manifesto, with the responsibility of updating the procedures of the House of Commons and enhancing overall standards.

Associated Subjects

Footer of Sky News

Information about Sky News

Services Provided by Sky News

Sky Networks

Additional Sky Websites

Proposed assisted dying laws to be debated by lawmakers soon stipulate that two physicians and a High Court judge must confirm a person's eligibility before they can legally choose to end their life. The legislation specifically excludes mental health conditions and disabilities as justifications for assisted dying, and it only applies to individuals with a life expectancy of six months or less.

Journalist specializing

Tuesday, November 12, 2024, 07:

Under proposed legislation for assisted dying, individuals will need to have a life expectancy of six months or less and must be capable of administering the lethal medication themselves to qualify for ending their life.

Under the proposed End of Life Bill, individuals with disabilities or mental health conditions will not qualify for assisted dying.

Members of Parliament are scheduled to cast their initial votes on the measures on November 29.

Should the proposed legislation be approved, it will undergo revisions and modifications ahead of subsequent voting rounds in both the House of Commons and the House of Lords, a process that could span several months before the bill is implemented.

Latest Political Update: Stay Updated as Assisted Dying Legislation is

The bill concerning end-of-life options for terminally ill adults was introduced by Labour Member of Parliament Kim Leadbeater.

Legislation proposed by Ms Leadbeater is now open for examination by both members of Parliament and the public, and it is intended to be enforced in England and Wales.

Following assurances of "strong protections," the decision will be made through a "free vote," allowing Members of Parliament to vote according to their own preferences without mandatory adherence to party directives.

Possible criteria for terminating one's life might involve:

• Being 18 years of age or older, and having been enrolled with a general practitioner for a minimum of one year;

• Possess the cognitive ability to choose to end one's life;

• Suffering from a terminal illness with an anticipated life expectancy of less than six months;

• Possess a consistent, decisive, and well-informed desire to die throughout the entire procedure, which is devoid of any coercion or persuasion;

• Express their wish to terminate their own life in two separate statements, each observed and authenticated by signatures;

• Assisted dying eligibility must be verified by two separate doctors, who have the option to seek further opinions from specialists if necessary.

• A High Court judge will review the application and has the authority to interrogate the doctors, the patient, and any other relevant parties as deemed necessary.

• A mandatory seven-day period must elapse after receiving clinical confirmation, and a 14-day period must pass following judicial consent, unless the individual's life expectancy is shorter.

These suggestions have emerged after recent discussions and recommendations in the legislative body.

For an enhanced viewing experience, it's recommended to utilize the Chrome browser to

14-year sentences for law offenders

Proponents of the legislation argue that it more comprehensively defines the responsibilities of physicians and introduces greater judicial oversight compared to earlier efforts to legalize assisted dying.

The instructions for physicians require that they ensure the individual is qualified to choose euthanasia and has made this choice freely, without coercion or undue influence.

The document will additionally emphasize that medical professionals must confirm that the patient is making a decision based on full understanding, which includes informing them about alternative treatment options such as palliative and hospice care.

The legislation ensures that participation by doctors is voluntary.

Stay updated on the most recent developments both within the UK and internationally by following Sky News.

Explore further: Address end-of-life care prior to legalizing assisted dying. Concerns of a 'slippery slope' unfounded with assisted dying legislation. Public panel supports assisted dying measures.

The medication designed to terminate the patient's life must be taken by the patient themselves, as doctors are prohibited from administering it.

The legislation also proposes incarceration for up to 14 years for individuals who violate the statute.

This could involve forcing an individual to commit suicide or pushing them to consume lethal medication.

The health secretary and chief medical officer are in charge of supervising assisted dying and will provide updates to parliament on the matter.

👉 Tap to follow the Sky News Daily on your preferred podcast platform 👈

Ms. Leadbeater informed Sky News, "This is set to be the strongest assisted dying law globally.

"The system includes multiple levels of protection, involving two doctors and a high court judge who will participate in the process and consult with the doctor."

"There will be a process of consultation, applying very strict criteria initially to determine eligibility for the bill."

Ms. Leadbeater refuted claims that she accelerated the release of the bill due to worries from MPs about insufficient time to review its contents.

She clarified the timeline adjustments: "I haven't moved up the schedule, and I'm not worried about the timing at all, no.

"I followed a thorough process, engaging in an extensive research consultation. I spoke with numerous organizations, groups, and individuals, gathering a broad range of opinions."

The Labour MP was queried about whether it posed an issue that Health Secretary Wes Streeting had expressed his disapproval of the bill.

She noted that the prime minister has expressed support for amending the legislation, and she feels that the present moment is appropriate for such a change.

Associated Subjects

Footer for Sky News

Information About Sky News

Services Provided by Sky News

Sky Networks

Additional Sky Websites

What would have happened if Rishi Sunak had chosen to delay the election until the present time?

Rishi Sunak caught quite a few off guard, even within his own party, by announcing a July date for the general election. The conventional wisdom was that he would postpone the electoral contest until now, hoping for an improved economic climate and the outcome of the US election. So, what could have been the implications of such a decision?

Senior political reporter @joncraig

Tuesday, November 12, 2024, 09:

This year, it's the ultimate political hypothetical.

Imagine if Rishi Sunak had followed through with the widely anticipated decision to call the general election this week, specifically on Thursday, November 14th, as many Members of Parliament had predicted earlier in the year?

Mr. Sunak stated that he was operating under the belief that the election would take place later in the year. Indeed, he kept his promise, narrowly, with an election scheduled for July 4.

Latest in Politics: Prime Minister not scheduled for Taliban talks at environmental conference

Since his unexpected declaration on May 22, up to the present, following the drastic reduction in Conservative seats, numerous Tories continue to view his decision to call an immediate election as a disastrous error.

The Conservative Party was reduced to only 121 Members of Parliament, marking their all-time low. The Labour Party secured 411 seats and the Liberal Democrats obtained 72, giving Sir Keir Starmer an impressive majority of 174 seats in the House of Commons.

Nigel Farage's Reform UK, holding only five seats yet garnering over four million votes, dealt a significant blow to the Conservatives. Several Tory MPs, despite having majorities of over 20,000, were swept away in the overwhelming defeat.

Further Discussion on Conservatives

Both Democrats and Conservatives grappled with COVID, inflation, and internal conflicts prior to their respective losses.

Tom Tugendhat has not been given a position in Kemi Badenoch's shadow cabinet, with Chris Philp being named the new shadow home secretary.

Who are the key members of Kemi Badenoch's latest shadow cabinet lineup?

Associated Subjects:

The date of November 14th had long been anticipated as the day for elections in Westminster. "It's almost as if November 14th is set in stone," ex-chancellor George Osborne remarked earlier in January.

Britain's leading expert on elections and political science, Sir John Curtice, concurred. "The consensus is starting to form around November 14," he stated, seven days prior to Mr. Osborne's forecast.

The prime minister is set to conclude the Conservative conference on October 2. This could potentially mark the beginning.

For an enhanced viewing experience, it is recommended to utilize the Chrome browser.

Stay updated on the 2024 election: Sunak announces July 4 election date amid heavy rain. Reform Party secures five seats while Farage faces heckling. Inside scoop: What’s unfolding within the Conservative Party following their loss.

However, it became clear that the only signal to begin at the Conservative Party conference was the commencement of the last rounds in the Conservative leadership contest, setting the stage for the showdown between Kemi Badenoch and Robert Jenrick.

In March, Michael Gove, who was a high-ranking cabinet minister at the time, suggested: "I think 14 November or 21st." He later stated: "I have no inside knowledge at all." Clearly, he didn't.

Would the Conservative Party have fared better – or perhaps worse – if Mr. Sunak had chosen the date that most of his MPs anticipated and had prepared for? Or would it have had little to no impact?

In his column for the Daily Mirror, Sky News commentator Kevin Maguire stated: "Sunak making an early move is on par with Jim Callaghan in 1978 and Gordon Brown's hesitation in 2007, along with Theresa May's sudden 2017 election, as four instances where prime ministers made disastrous decisions."

The 2024 election campaign took the country and even Westminster off guard, including Mr. Sunak's own Conservative Party. The Tories were notably behind, having not yet chosen candidates for numerous important constituencies and were significantly underprepared.

How might things have changed if Mr. Sunak had delayed his decision until November? The recent US election underscored the validity of Bill Clinton's famous phrase, "It's the economy, stupid," which contributed to Donald Trump's win last week.

Stay informed about the most recent developments in the UK and globally by tuning into Sky News.

Since July, the economy has shown positive trends, boosting the Labour government.

Inflation has dropped to 1.7%, and following recent reductions in interest rates, mortgage costs have decreased.

Conservative MPs thought that implementing tax reductions could have enhanced their party's prospects before the November elections. However, in the midst of the campaign, Chancellor Jeremy Hunt asserted that tax cuts and reduced interest rates would not significantly benefit the Conservatives.

"In an interview with the Mail on Sunday in June, he expressed doubt about the effectiveness of additional tax reductions, noting, 'The reality that two major tax cuts haven’t shifted the polls suggests to me that another similar cut probably won’t alter the situation either,'" he said, sounding quite downbeat.

According to the Bank of England, it takes about 18 months for changes in interest rates to significantly affect individuals' financial situations. Therefore, the notion that a decrease in interest rates will instantly boost consumer sentiment is an oversimplification of how these decisions impact people.

While economic updates have been favorable for the Labour Party, the situation regarding illegal migrants crossing the channel has only brought negative headlines.

This week, it was disclosed that the total number of arrivals climbed to 32,691, marking a 22% increase from the previous year.

Numerous Conservative MPs thought that postponing until November might have allowed the contentious Rwanda deportation strategy to reduce the numbers, but many within Mr. Sunak's administration were skeptical about its effectiveness. Did this influence the decision to go for a July vote?

It is clear, though, that delaying until November could have prevented some severe mistakes. Among the worst was Mr. Sunak cutting short his attendance at the D-Day commemoration to participate in a television interview for the election.

Would the disturbances during the summer following the stabbings in Southport have occurred under a Conservative administration? Likely. Would Mr. Farage have still staged his dramatic and ultimately triumphant return, or devoted more time to supporting Mr. Trump in the US? The appeal of a return would probably have been too tempting to resist.

History may have looked more favorably upon Mr. Sunak if he had served for two full years as Prime Minister instead of just one year and 255 days. Had he remained in office until November, he would have surpassed Sir Antony Eden in terms of length of service as Prime Minister.

By choosing an early election, Mr. Sunak provided Sir Keir with the opportunity to quickly establish himself as a global leader, attending a NATO summit in Washington during his initial week as Prime Minister.

Stay ahead with the latest breaking news updates.

Download the Sky News application at no cost

The Conservative Party leadership contest could have been delayed, preventing some hopefuls from losing their parliamentary positions. For instance, Penny Mordaunt was narrowly defeated by Labour, with a margin of only 780 votes in Portsmouth North.

Why then did Mr. Sunak not postpone? A former senior Conservative MP, who has since resigned but maintains that the July 4th election was a grave mistake, is certain that the decision was driven by the challenge to his leadership from dissenting MPs within his party.

"First off, I'd still be receiving a salary," the former MP shared with Sky News. "It was purely a result of the party leadership, the rebellious MPs, and his concerns over passing his bills. But now, with only 121 MPs, it's quite challenging to mount any opposition.

"In 1997, our party held 165 seats in Parliament. Had elections been held in November, it's possible we could have secured between 145 and 150 seats. While fewer, this tally would have still been respectable and would have facilitated a more effective role in the opposition."

"Holding the election on November 14 would have been beneficial as it would follow the US election and Trump's win. Rishi could have argued during his campaign that Trump’s presidency was not the moment to gamble on an inexperienced candidate."

By making his move so soon, Mr. Sunak has positioned Sir Keir as more than just a newcomer in international circles. This week's trips to Paris and the COP conference mark his 13th journey abroad: while he's not quite a seasoned pro, he is certainly recognized as a significant global player.

🎧 Tune into the 'Politics At Jack And Sam's' podcast on your favorite listening app! 🎧

It appears that holding the election in July, as opposed to November, didn’t drastically change the outcome, but it likely exacerbated the extent of the Conservative Party's loss.

One individual possibly grateful that the election did not occur on Thursday, November 14, is King Charles, as it coincides with his birthday.

Associated Subjects

Footer for Sky News

Information About Sky News

Services Provided by Sky News

Channels Under Sky

Additional Sky Websites

Major Action Could Determine the Outcome of the End Of Life Bill

Labour MP Kim Leadbeater states that her legislation includes the most rigorous protections for assisted dying found globally.

Health reporter @ashishskynews

Monday, November 11, 2024, 23:

The complete specifics of the End Of Life Bill have been disclosed, allowing MPs and peers ample opportunity to review the document thoroughly before casting their votes on this significant matter.

Society hasn't undergone such transformations since the passage of the Abortion Act in 1967.

Labour MP Kim Leadbeater has conducted thorough investigations ahead of introducing her bill, set to be released on Tuesday.

For an improved video playback experience, it is recommended to utilize the Chrome browser

This measure ought to partially alleviate concerns about protecting the weakest segments of society and prevent the "slippery slope" phenomenon. This occurs when legislation initially targets a specific group but is subsequently expanded to encompass additional groups, often as a result of legal challenges.

This is what occurred in other areas.

The lawmaker emphasizes that assisted death would be restricted solely to terminally ill patients who have six months or fewer to live, and once enacted, the legislation would be irrevocable and not subject to amendments.

The request for euthanasia will only be granted once it has received approval from two independent physicians and a High Court judge.

Further Discussion on Assisted Dying

Legislator Claims Assisted Dying Bill Focuses on 'Autonomy and Choice'

Understanding Starmer's Takeaways from Trump's

Proposals for assisted dying include a six-month life expectancy and the ability for individuals to administer medication themselves.

Associated Subjects:

Leadbeater claims that this is the most rigorous protection imposed on assisted dying laws globally. This could sway the opinions of certain legislators who remain on the fence.

Nonetheless, worries about the continued decline in palliative care remain.

👉 Tap here to follow the Sky News Daily on your favorite podcast platform 👈

Health Secretary Wes Streeting has expressed his opposition to the proposal for this reason.

This is a significant move that could determine the outcome of the legislation.

Leadbeater presents a compelling case, arguing that high-quality palliative care and the choice for certain terminally ill individuals to choose euthanasia can coexist.

Read more: Ed Davey reflects on the 'pain' of caring for his terminally ill mother during his childhood. Leadbeater argues that legally assisted dying does not create a 'slippery slope'.

Stay informed with the most recent updates from the UK and across the globe by tuning into Sky News.

Some NHS employees are expressing concerns that the health service is already stretched too thin to handle additional strain. This is a legitimate issue that requires attention.

Stay ahead with the latest breaking news updates.

Download the Sky News application at no cost

The topic is intricate and polarizing, with many holding strong, unchangeable views regardless of the arguments presented either for or against.

Now, others can examine the specifics and form their own opinions.

Associated Subjects

Sky News Bottom Bar

Information about Sky News

Services Provided by Sky News

Sky Network Channels

Additional Sky Websites

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has called on the private sector to increase their financial contributions to combat global climate change. As he prepares to attend the COP29 summit in Baku, Azerbaijan, Sir Keir announced that the UK government will not allocate additional public funds beyond the £11.6 billion previously pledged by former governments, emphasizing the need for greater private sector involvement.

Journalist specializing

Tuesday, November 12, 2024, at 9

As he departs for the COP summit in Baku, Azerbaijan, the prime minister has urged businesses to invest in combating global climate change.

During his journey to the Caspian coast, Sir Keir addressed the reporters accompanying him.

He was questioned about whether the UK, which is reportedly facing economic challenges, would allocate fresh funds to assist developing nations in tackling climate change.

Latest in Politics: NHS Warned to Enhance Care to Secure Salary Increase

Calls are mounting for a financing deal worth $1 trillion to assist developing countries in cutting emissions and achieving various goals.

Sir Keir informed the press that his administration would uphold the financial commitments made during a prior COP summit by the previous Conservative government.

At the COP29 conference, discussions will focus on establishing a climate finance target that extends to 2035, although no specific financial commitments will be made by the UK at this time, he stated.

Further Insight on Keir Starmer

COP29: Life Adjustments Guaranteed if Starmer Achieves Ambitious Climate Goals – However, a Crucial Element Lacks for Triumph

What would the scenario look like if Rishi Sunak had chosen to delay calling an election until this moment?

Starmer will be the first British Prime Minister to commemorate Armistice Day in France since Churchill.

Associated Subjects:

Sir Keir stated: "I will strongly advocate for the private sector to begin contributing their fair share towards these obligations."

Under this initiative, a novel "capital market mechanism" is set to debut on the London Stock Exchange. Officials at Downing Street are optimistic that this will generate £75 billion for environmentally focused investments in the coming ten years.

For an optimal video viewing experience, it is recommended to utilize the Chrome browser

Learn more about COP: The leader asserts that the oil-producing state is the ideal host. Commitment to transition away from fossil fuels reaches its first anniversary. The fierce debate over climate funding is set to escalate. Could Starmer enhance his local strategy by spending time overseas?

Sir Keir and the administration are eager to tap into the rising wave of eco-friendly investments to boost their economic expansion plans.

He informed the press that he views the "climate challenge" as a significant opportunity for the UK, provided it is handled correctly.

This is the reason we've set a goal to achieve clean energy by 2030. If you examine the internal investments attracted in the past four months, a significant portion is focused on renewable energy sources. This is the sector where global investors are increasingly looking to allocate their funds.

"I view tackling climate change not only as a crucial responsibility where we must lead by example, but also as a remarkable chance for the UK to excel globally. I am committed to ensuring we seize this opportunity."

Downing Street is confident that the UK can serve as a central hub for eco-friendly finance, leveraging this role to attract investments, create jobs, and stimulate economic growth.

A study indicated that the "green economy" expanded by 9% in the previous year, in contrast to the overall stagnation of the UK economy, prompting calls from the business community for a pro-green industrial policy.

Stay informed with the most recent updates from the UK and international news by tuning into Sky News.

👉 Tune in to Sky News Daily on your favorite podcast platform 👈

The recently formed administration has begun to sanction additional initiatives such as terrestrial wind and solar energy farms.

Expanding the economy is crucial to the strategy devised by Sir Keir and Chancellor Rachel Reeves. However, realizing their objectives might prove challenging if economic growth doesn't meet their expectations.

Associated Subjects

Sky News Bottom Section

Information About Sky News

Services Provided by Sky News

Sky Network Channels

Additional Sky Websites

UK commits to ambitious new climate target – yet some elements are still lacking

The commitment was well received at the COP29 climate summit in Azerbaijan, where wealthy, high-emission nations such as the UK are anticipated to set a precedent. However, the UK was cautioned that it lacked comprehensive strategies. At the same time, Azerbaijan justified its ongoing production of fossil fuels, describing it as a "gift" from God.

Climate journalist @SeabrookClimate

Tuesday, November 12, 2024, 2:

The UK has announced an ambitious new target to reduce its emissions by 81% by the year 2035.

The administration has declared its commitment to "address the climate emergency while enhancing the welfare of UK citizens" through investments in renewable energy sources and reducing reliance on unpredictable fossil fuel markets.

During the COP29 climate discussions in Baku, Azerbaijan, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer declared, "We are in a competitive quest for the clean energy employment opportunities and the future economy."

The recent commitment has been well received at COP29, where affluent, high-emission nations such as the UK are anticipated to set a precedent for the 200 countries convened for the discussions.

Read further: Starmer urges private companies to 'begin contributing their fair share' as tensions over climate finance are set to escalate.

The plan aligns with recommendations from its climate consultants to address domestic climate change issues and fulfill commitments made in the pivotal Paris Agreement during COP21 in 2015.

In the past three and a half decades, starting from 1990, the United Kingdom has successfully reduced its emissions by half.

It aims to reduce them by an additional 31% within the next decade.

However, the consultants from the Climate Change Committee (CCC) have cautioned that the government lacks the necessary strategies to achieve its goals.

Stay updated with the latest news as it happens

Download the Sky News application at no cost.

"Emma Pinchbeck, the new chief of the CCC, affirmed that reaching the 81% target is within reach," she stated.

"The not-so-positive news for the government is that they are falling short of their current goals."

She stated that the reason we haven't achieved our goals isn't due to a lack of available technologies or unfavorable economics, but because there has been no clear implementation strategy provided by the government.

Starmer's Pledge Offers a Glimmer of Hope

Science and Technology Editor

Sir Keir Starmer's appearance at COP29, pledging significant reductions in the UK's carbon emissions, offers a glimmer of hope amid a generally dismal beginning to the climate discussions.

The victory of Donald Trump, who promised to withdraw the world’s biggest economy from the discussions, represented a major blow to a series of negotiations aimed at increasing aspirations and securing financial support for the shift away from fossil fuels.

To make matters worse, Sir Keir was among the handful of G20 leaders who actually attended the discussions. Notably absent were President Biden, along with the leaders from China, Brazil, Germany, and France.

The UK's pledge to reduce emissions demonstrates that a top-tier economy can thrive while moving away from fossil fuels. This underscores the crucial point being emphasized in these discussions: achieving net zero should be viewed as a chance for economic expansion, not a detriment.

Undoubtedly, it's a gamble politically. Achieving an 81% reduction in emissions over the next decade demands a massive and initially expensive endeavor.

The Labour Party's strategy to achieve zero-carbon electricity is a bold one, but it's not sufficient by itself. Enhancing the energy efficiency of homes and transitioning away from gas heating is crucial. Additionally, detailed actions such as safeguarding peat bogs, upland areas, and overhauling farming practices are also vital components of this strategy.

At this conference, Sir Keir's risky decision is likely to be applauded. However, the reaction may not be as positive when he returns.

The UK is considered one of the top countries globally in reducing emissions from power plants that supply electricity to our homes.

She stated that the current issues primarily lie in our home heating methods and transportation systems, including the need for cleaner alternatives in aviation and shipping.

Kenya's chief diplomat described the goal as "very challenging."

Musalia Mudavadi emphasized to Sky News the global necessity for "tangible instances of major economies making significant progress in addressing climate change."

However, he cautioned that nations would be vigilant to make sure "no one is reversing course."

Advocates argue that for the UK to genuinely claim leadership in climate issues, it must also provide fresh financial support for climate initiatives in developing countries.

For optimal video playback, it is recommended to use the Chrome browser.

Petroleum resources are considered a divine blessing

The goal is a component of the UK's latest environmental strategy, and Sir Keir encouraged other nations at the conference to "set their own ambitious objectives."

This increases the urgency for other developed countries and the host nation, Azerbaijan, to disclose their strategies, referred to in United Nations terminology as NDCs (nationally determined contributions).

On Sunday, Azerbaijan declined to agree to release a new report during the summit.

In his introductory remarks, Azerbaijan's authoritarian leader Ilham Aliyev championed the nation's oil and gas sectors, describing them as divine endowments akin to the sun and wind.

He sharply criticized Western detractors of his nation's oil and gas sector, accusing them of targeting the industry with a "meticulously planned attack of defamation and extortion" and "false information."

President Aliyev argued that labeling Azerbaijan as a "petrostate" is unjust, given that the nation contributes less than 1% to global oil and gas production.

His administration's budget is 60% dependent on fossil fuels, which also make up 90% of its exports.

Sky News Information Footer

Overview of Sky News

Services Provided by Sky News

Sky Network Channels

Additional Sky Websites

SNP Westminster chief Stephen Flynn seeks a seat in the Scottish Parliament in the upcoming Holyrood election. Frequently mentioned as a likely future leader of the SNP, Flynn has dismissed rumors that his candidacy is a strategy to succeed John Swinney.

Scotland correspondent @Jenster13

Tuesday, November 12, 2024, 10:

Stephen Flynn, the SNP leader at Westminster, has declared his candidacy for the 2026 Holyrood election, dismissing rumors that he is positioning himself to succeed John Swinney.

Mr. Flynn, aged 36, successfully secured re-election as the Member of Parliament for Aberdeen South in the general election held in July. He has recently applied to pursue his party's nomination for the seat of Aberdeen South and North Kincardine in an effort to become a Member of the Scottish Parliament.

Mr. Flynn stated that if he succeeds, he will continue serving as an MP until the upcoming Westminster election, but he will not receive two salaries.

In an article for the Press and Journal newspaper, Mr. Flynn announced his decision to enter the fray by stating he was "tossing his hat into the ring

He further stated, "I don't intend to be absent from the forthcoming challenges that our city, county, and nation will confront in Holyrood.

"From investing in clean energy to supporting childcare services, from providing free college education to dealing with increased household expenses, from issues with accessing doctors to discussions on economic expansion, the range of debates will be broad and diverse."

"In my view, we have reached a critical crossroads in the narrative of our country."

Further Details on Aberdeen Incident

Darren Donaldson: Ice Hockey Player Sentenced for Sexual Assault of Teenager After Collecting Her from a Sleepover

Scottish Conservatives call for a declaration from Neil Gray concerning his use of a chauffeured car to attend soccer games.

The family of Alan Geddes, a father killed by Stuart Quinn, a recently freed inmate, is taking legal action against the Scottish government

He expressed his desire to assist his party in "making the argument for independence."

Mr. Flynn is frequently mentioned as a likely candidate for future party leadership.

He chose not to enter the SNP leadership contest this year to succeed Humza Yousaf, opting instead to support the ultimate victor, Mr. Swinney.

Since Mr. Flynn is not a Member of the Scottish Parliament, assuming the role of First Minister at Holyrood would have posed a challenge.

Shifting to the Scottish parliament could steer him closer to becoming Scotland's premier leader.

In a conversation with the Press and Journal regarding his aspirations for leadership, Mr. Flynn stated, "I don't believe the SNP will be holding a leadership contest for quite some time.

"I have complete trust in how John Swinney is restructuring the party and redirecting the government's focus.

"I understand the curiosity that drives numerous individuals to conjecture about what my goals may or may not be."

"Certainly, I'm committed to doing all within my power to support my party and serve my nation, and that commitment will always remain steadfast."

Stay updated with the newest developments in the UK and international news by tuning into Sky News.

The window for submitting applications to potentially become an SNP candidate in the upcoming Scottish parliament election concluded on Monday. However, the official selection proceedings won't commence until the following year.

Mr. Flynn expressed that he was not particularly thrilled at the prospect of challenging incumbent MSP Audrey Nicoll for the nomination in the Aberdeen South and North Kincardine constituency.

When reached for comment by Sky News, Ms. Nicoll stated, "As a constituency MSP, my primary commitment is to relentlessly serve my constituents, irrespective of any internal party selection activities.

"I am eager for any competition, as ultimately it is up to the branch members to choose their representatives for the 2026 Scottish parliament elections in Holyrood."

Discover additional details on Sky News: What would the scenario be if Sunak had chosen to declare an election at this moment? Scottish Conservatives call for an official explanation regarding a minister's use of chauffeur-driven vehicles to attend football games.

Stay ahead with the latest breaking news updates.

Download the Sky News application at no cost.

Prior to the 2021 elections in Scotland, the Scottish National Party (SNP) amended its rules, mandating that its MPs step down from their Westminster positions if they choose to contend for a seat in the Holyrood

This resulted in former MP Joanna Cherry withdrawing from the race for the Edinburgh Central seat. At that time, she stated that the alteration in rules had significantly handicapped her in her campaign for Holyrood selection.

Mr. Flynn expressed his view that party regulations were tailored specifically for elections.

Ms. Cherry, who was defeated in her Westminster position in July, extended her good wishes to Mr. Flynn but mentioned that the SNP's policy on holding dual mandates seemed to be "specific to the individual."

She shared on X, stating: "It fulfilled its function and I anticipate it will be taken down."

In his article, Mr. Flynn mentioned that he would need to "think more strategically and increase his efforts," referencing SNP leaders like Mr. Swinney and the late Alex Salmond, who previously managed to maintain positions in both parliaments.

He also stated, "I'm optimistic about following in their footsteps."

Associated Subjects

Footer of Sky News

Information About Sky News

Services Provided by Sky News

Channels under Sky

Additional Sites by Sky

Legislation proposing the legalization of assisted dying in the UK has been unveiled, with MPs set to vote on its advancement in the coming weeks, according to one Member of Parliament who emphasized that the bill is centered on personal autonomy and choice.

Political journalist @alixculbertson

Tuesday, November 12, 2024, 12:

The lawmaker advocating for assisted dying laws stated that it is more humane for individuals to take life-ending medication themselves rather than having someone else administer it.

The recently unveiled Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, made public on Monday, stipulates that patients must self-administer the life-ending medication, as doctors are prohibited from administering it.

The provision further requires that individuals be in the final stages of a terminal illness with a prognosis of six months or less to live.

Latest in Politics: Prime Minister withholds his stance on upcoming assisted dying legislation vote

Kim Leadbeater, the Member of Parliament sponsoring the bill, explained to Sky News: "At the stage when a patient reaches this decision, they have already undergone an extensive period of contemplation about this choice."

"Additionally, they have the option to alter their decision at that time if they choose to."

Further Discussion on Assisted Dying

Starmer's Takeaways from Trump

Major Action May Determine the Future of the End Of Life Bill

Proposals for assisted dying include a six-month life expectancy and the ability for individuals to self-administer medications.

Associated Subjects:

"Self-administering is not harsh or cruel. It is, in fact, a gentle process carried out in the presence of family and friends.

"That’s the type of demise individuals prefer over, from what I’ve gathered, enduring days of agonizing conversations with death, coupled with vomiting and other dreadful, unbearable situations."

She emphasized that the bill focuses on personal freedom and the right to choose, underscoring that the decision and action must belong to the individual alone.

Ms. Leadbeater noted that requiring terminally ill patients to decide and administer the medication on their own adds an additional layer of safety and protection.

Lawmakers are set to have an unrestricted vote on the proposed legislation in late November, allowing them to cast their votes according to their personal beliefs rather than adhering to party directives.

Several Members of Parliament have expressed uncertainty about their stance, and a significant number are anticipated to abstain from voting. Nonetheless, numerous MPs have declared positions both in support of and against the issue.

According to the legislation, two separate physicians must verify that a patient qualifies for assisted suicide, and a High Court judge's authorization is also required for the process to proceed.

Stay informed on the most recent updates from across the UK and globally by tuning into Sky News.

Stay updated with the latest breaking news

Download the Sky News application at no cost

Ms. Leadbeater stated that this measure is one component of multiple layers of safety and protection measures, which she hopes will reassure the public that they are addressing the necessary issues, given the current lack of safeguards.

During a briefing on Tuesday morning about the proposed legislation, Nathaniel Dye, a terminal cancer patient who has lost both his fiancée and mother to the disease, expressed his support for the bill.

Overview: What is included in the proposed assisted dying legislation?

For an optimal video viewing experience, it is recommended to utilize the Chrome browser

"He views the bill as an opportunity," he stated.

"While I remain optimistic, the possibility of undergoing brain surgery looms over me, and my main hope is to get through it safely. Admittedly, it's a daunting prospect that no one would eagerly volunteer for, but I continue to hope for the best."

"Nevertheless, I remain optimistic, yet I'm getting ready for adverse outcomes. I view this legislation as an opportunity for individuals like myself to potentially, though not necessarily, sidestep the direst consequences, including a tragic end."

"I have no hope of improvement, only the prospect of enduring ongoing pain and distress. This could be the case despite receiving the highest quality of palliative treatment."

"Stories have reached my ears, and it was beyond my imagination. The opportunity I perceive in this veil seems to also extend to others in my circumstances."

"In an effort to perform one final gesture of goodwill towards their loved ones, and perhaps for personal solace too, they asked, 'Can we prevent this dreadful demise? Can we ensure my passing is as gentle and merciful as can be?'"

Associated Subjects

Sky News Bottom Section

Information on Sky News

Services Provided by Sky News

Sky Network Channels

Additional Sky Websites

Former Labour consultant John McTernan has proposed radical changes to agriculture, akin to Thatcher's approach to coal mines.

The Prime Minister has separated himself from remarks by John McTernan, amid a continuing dispute with farmers regarding alterations to inheritance tax.

Political correspondent @fayebrownSky

Tuesday, November 12, 2024, 3:

Sir Keir Starmer has separated himself from remarks made by an ex-adviser to Tony Blair, who claimed that the UK "does not require small farmers."

The prime minister expressed strong disagreement with John McTernan's statement about treating farmers similarly to how Margaret Thatcher dealt with the miners.

Politics Live: Starmer Unveils Ambitious Climate Goal, Accompanied by Significant Uncertainties

The ex-leader of the Conservative Party, during her time in office, shut numerous coal mines, an action perceived as the initial phase in the decline of the previously dominant British coal sector.

When questioned about Mr. McTernan's comments at a COP29 conference Q&A session, Sir Keir stated, "I am fully dedicated to backing our farmers, as I have expressed both before and after the election.

"I'm delighted to announce that we're allocating £5 billion from our budget for the upcoming two years towards agriculture.

"I believe it is crucial for their success to be sustained long-term, and therefore, I completely oppose those remarks."

For an optimal video viewing experience, it is recommended to use the Chrome browser

Sir Keir has found himself embroiled in a dispute with agriculturalists following the budget's implementation of a 20% tax on inherited farming assets exceeding £1 million.

Agricultural organizations have cautioned that the modification could disastrously affect small-scale farms, and they have threatened to strike and block ports if the policy is not revised.

In an interview with GB News, ex-Labour advisor Mr. McTernan expressed his personal support for treating farmers in the same manner that Margaret Thatcher dealt with the miners, advocating for the shutdown of an industry.

"He stated that this is an industry we can manage without."

"If individuals are so frustrated that they feel compelled to take to the streets and cover them with muck, then we can do without the small-scale farmers."

Senior Tories have criticized Mr. McTernan's remarks, with the shadow justice secretary, Robert Jenrick, charging the Labour Party with engaging in a "politics of bitterness and envy" in response to the proposed tax policies.

Remarks 'startlingly reckless'

A source from the Labour Party criticized his remarks as "astonishingly reckless foolishness from an individual who is not an official government representative."

Speaking to Sky News, they said, "Labour recognizes and appreciates the significant effort put in by our farmers to provide food for the country. This is precisely why we have approved an unprecedented budget for sustainable food production."

"Family farms will continue to be handed down through generations, as they should be. By preventing affluent individuals from acquiring farmland simply to dodge inheritance taxes, we will maintain reasonable land prices for the next generation of farmers."

Current tax exemptions permit agricultural landowners to transfer their estates and properties to their relatives without incurring inheritance taxes, whether during their lifetimes or through their wills.

During the financial statement, Chancellor Rachel Reeves declared that starting in April 2026, the full tax exemption will apply solely to the initial £1 million of combined agricultural and business property.

Landowners will be subject to a 20% tax rate on amounts exceeding that threshold, instead of the typical 40% inheritance tax (IHT) rate that is imposed on other lands and properties.

Government officials maintain that the new regulations will impact only about 25% of farmers, specifically those who own the most land. Contrarily, agricultural workers and their representative organizations argue that the scope is much broader, potentially influencing up to three-quarters of the UK's food production and driving up the price of domestically produced food.

Associated Subjects

Footer for Sky News

Information on Sky News

Services Provided by Sky News

Sky Networks

Additional Sky Websites