SPORT NEWS – The RACER Mailbag, January 25

The RACER Mailbag, January 25

Welcome to the RACER Mailbag. Questions for any of RACER’s writers will be despatched to mailbag@racer.com. Because of the excessive quantity of questions obtained, we are able to’t assure that each letter can be printed, however we’ll reply as many as we are able to. Revealed questions could also be edited for size and readability. Questions obtained after 3pm ET every Monday will seem the next week.

Q: Everybody has questions on a brand new IndyCar. Why doesn’t somebody re-engineer the DP01? After the Katherine Legge crash at Highway America, it does have a strong security cell, and if bear in mind appropriately, it was designed with potential oval use in thoughts. My opinion is that it was the best-looking open-wheeler.

Dino, New Hanover, PA

MARSHALL PRUETT: And each driver who raced Champ Automobile’s 2007 Panoz DP01 that went to the IndyCar Sequence and the previous Dallara chassis after which the brand new Dallara DW12 stated the DP01 was the right automobile.

I’m hardly ever a ‘let’s return in time to resolve right now’s issues’ type of man, however I do suppose the designers of the DW29 or no matter yr it arrives can be sensible to purchase a DP01 and research every little thing about it. Chic aero and mechanical steadiness; regarded nice and made for excellent racing. Updating a automobile from 2007 isn’t the reply, but when Dallara might convey its spirit ahead into it’s subsequent chassis, that will be superb.

Q: Why isn’t the ‘Ed runs ovals and Simona run the remainder’ association not taking place once more? It appeared like ECR was the right place for the female-forward Paretta Autosport. ECR developed from Sarah Fisher Racing, and it was Carpenter who gave Danica Patrick her final journey at Indy, so clearly ECR has no subject with working/working with ladies. It could be a wise set-up even when Ed employed Simona straight.

IndyCar normally is lacking the boat on this space. Final time anyone checked, ladies account for simply over 50% of the inhabitants, and wouldn’t or not it’s good to recruit an entire new fanbase of women and girls? Was it 5 – 6 ladies that ran at Indy one yr? No want for tokenism, both. Whereas none besides Patrick received a top-tier journey, there was good success by ladies drivers given the prospect. Sarah Fisher ran nicely, and given a superb automobile Simona would have stood on the rostrum quite a few occasions.

I’m beginning to violate my very own pet peeve about mailbox questions being extra soapbox rants, so I’ll go away it with, “why not a much bigger effort in the direction of feminine drivers?”

Rob Stone, Culpeper, VA

MP: I hear what you’re saying, Rob. What involves thoughts right here is sure, IndyCar ought to be doing extra to assist ladies racers by means of the extraordinarily particular ‘Race For Equality & Change’ program it selected to create to handle such issues. What additionally involves thoughts is IndyCar additionally has 10 full-time groups, lots of whom have sponsors and companions who would profit from initiating their very own RFEC-type applications to develop ladies racers—and that’s every little thing from drivers to mechanics to engineers and each different function—and racers of colour.

So, sure, IndyCar’s kicking ass in terms of creating and advancing Black racers by means of the RFEC, however it hasn’t taken the identical aggressive strategy to creating extra ladies racers. I hope that improves, clearly, however slightly than place an expectation for IndyCar to resolve each subject, this looks as if one which improves quickly if all 10 groups take part and assist the sequence.

Q: Penske, Ganassi, and Shank have all been concerned with IMSA prototypes, joined now by Rahal and Andretti. I might suppose they’ve all seen how the brand new GTP rules have led to a rise in producer involvement and pleasure, and they might be pushing for comparable modifications with IndyCar. Are they pushing? If not, why not? They definitely have seen the outcomes.

My cynical aspect additionally wonders if Penske purchased IMS and IndyCar just for the Speedway, which is probably the most helpful asset. If IndyCar lags behind NASCAR and F1, oh nicely, he nonetheless has IMS.

Lastly, a heretical thought. Would IndyCar be higher if NASCAR owned the sequence, since they no less than appear prepared to market, experiment, and alter rules as they’ve with IMSA prototypes? I dwell within the Miami space and that is probably the most excited I’ve been for IMSA for the reason that Miami GP days with the Porsche 962, Jaguar, Mazda, Nissan, and Toyota.

I agree together with your remark in final week’s Mailbag: IndyCar wants some management from individuals not born final century, or no less than not earlier than 1990. IndyCar has to take the initiative and never wait for brand new producers, and so on. As a earlier reader wrote, I additionally wish to see 20 automobiles with extra producers and know-how than 27 spec racers. Ideas?

Rick, Homestead, FL

MP: The explanation we’ve got half of IndyCar’s full-time entrants concerned in IMSA’s new GTP class is due to the cash these producers are spending to have them run manufacturing unit groups. And it’s good cash. That’s simply the details. If these producers wished IndyCar groups to race procuring carts on their behalf and wrote the identical massive checks, drivers can be strapping in and racing procuring carts. That the GTP method is superior and has attracted loads of producers is only a bonus.

I got here up within the sport the place spec automobiles actually weren’t a factor, so I’ll all the time lean in the direction of individuality, customization, and letting one’s creativity be the core of what you construct or develop. I’ll take that 20 with freedom over 27 which can be spec each time.

Q: This pertains to your response to the January 18th letter from ‘Bruce’ relating to Method E, the Indianapolis Motor Speedway traditionally being a proving floor for automotive know-how, and whether or not there could possibly be a chance for FE to run at IMS. Particularly, your remark that FE is a ‘spec sequence’ so there wouldn’t be a lot to show at IMS.

This can be splitting hairs, however your remark might presumably be re-evaluated. Sure, FE makes use of a spec chassis and battery. Nonetheless, it has seven (sure, that’s seven) OEMs setting up and utilizing their very own drivetrains (engine, inverter, gearbox, electronics) within the sequence. And, all of them go to nice lengths to make use of the sequence to showcase and promote their technological engineering prowess (effectivity/vary) to compete towards one another within the client market. Usually, this forefront know-how will get transferred from their race automobiles to their highway automobiles. So one might conclude that Bruce’s thought course of isn’t completely off-base.

From carefully following the letters, feedback, and solutions on this house relating to IndyCar’s lack of ability to safe a 3rd engine producer which is hindering its viability inside the sport, maybe the trail FE has taken that has led to seven engine producers taking part in and selling the sequence could possibly be utilized to IndyCar? Positive, the fee to run a FE automobile is larger. However with the FE value cap, it is available in round 30% larger per automobile than it’s to run a aggressive IndyCar for a season. That’s not insignificant, but additionally not an excessive amount of of a stretch if the aim is to have extra engine producers within the sequence who, in flip, would use it to advertise their highway automobiles, resulting in way more intensive protection/consciousness (and nationwide/international viability?) for IndyCar.

Would FE acquire something now by working at IMS? That’s a bigger subject for dialogue. However Bruce’s suggestion that IMS could possibly be a proving floor for FE’s automotive electrification know-how definitely holds some weight.

Daniel Colombo, Toronto

MP: Thanks, Daniel. Heaps to unpack, however I’ll hold it transient. Sure, I’m conscious FE has extra freedoms than ever. It nonetheless doesn’t land with me as being significantly attention-grabbing, nor would I ever have a look at the brand new automobiles and say that working them at IMS would join with the Speedway’s authentic spirit of innovation. At the moment’s IndyCars don’t have fun that spirit, so my pushback isn’t restricted to FE.

As for all of the producers who’re concerned, it’s the world’s solely all-electric open-wheel sequence. The place else would they become involved?

SPORT NEWS – The RACER Mailbag, January 25


To Top