Nissan Juke vs Skoda Kamiq vs SEAT Arona
The primary Juke kick-started the entire supermini-SUV section; beforehand, this a part of the market was primarily rugged small 4x4s, just like the Suzuki Jimny. However the funky-looking Nissan proved that consumers wished vehicles that had a bit extra practicality than a supermini and the styling of an SUV, however with out the bigger dimensions.
• Finest crossovers and SUVs on sale now
Different automobile makers noticed the potential of the section and in recent times the selection has expanded quickly. Even simply in the previous few months we’ve been behind the wheel of a number of fashions new to the category, together with the Skoda Kamiq, which received its first Auto Specific group check. Equally, there are some established gamers, too. The SEAT Arona, which is the opposite automobile on this check, has been round since 2017, and has been a constant presence on the prime of the category.
Right here we’ll discover out what Nissan has finished to convey its pioneering mannequin updated with at this time’s competitors, and which of those three small SUVs makes probably the most sense for probably the most consumers.
|Mannequin:||Nissan Juke 1.Zero DIG-T 117 Tekna|
|Engine:||1.0-litre 3cyl petrol, 115bhp|
|Check economic system:||41.2mpg/9.1mpl|
|Annual highway tax:||£145|
That is the second-generation Nissan Juke; the Japanese model has taken its time with its alternative for the big-selling authentic. Right here we’ve a 1.Zero DIG-T mannequin in Tekna trim, which prices £22,495.
Design & engineering
The brand new Nissan Juke is likely one of the first fashions to make use of the Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi Alliance’s CMF-B platform, which has been developed to convey enhancements to a lot of areas of the vehicles that can use it. It’s additionally engineered to permit electrical powertrains in addition to the newest autonomous security tech and driving aids. One other mannequin that makes use of this structure is the newest Renault Clio, which received its first group check towards the nicely established Ford Fiesta and SEAT Ibiza.
At 4,210mm lengthy and 1,800mm extensive, this new Juke is larger than the outdated mannequin, however it shares some design touches with the unique model, such because the bubble-like headlights and exaggerated wheelarches.
As is frequent on this class of automobile, the Juke makes use of a three-cylinder turbocharged petrol engine. The Nissan’s 1.0-litre unit has 115bhp and 200Nm of torque, which is similar to the 113bhp and 200Nm from the 1.0-litre unit in its rivals.
Our check mannequin had a six-speed handbook gearbox, driving the entrance wheels solely. Automobiles on this class might need SUV styling, however homeowners seldom, if ever, take them off highway, so there’s no want for four-wheel drive. It’s uncommon on this class and neither rival right here has it, nor do they want it, as a result of it provides pointless weight.
The Juke’s inside is nicely put collectively and there are some good-quality supplies in sure locations, however arduous plastics in others, whereas cheap-feeling buttons and controls imply the cabin doesn’t appear as elegant as its rivals’. Whereas all three fashions have some low-rent supplies inside, the Juke’s extra elaborate cabin design can’t cover them as successfully.
Customary gear on this Tekna mannequin contains LED lights, cruise management, 19-inch alloys, a 360-degree digital camera, blind-spot help, heated seats and an eight-inch touchscreen infotainment system with smartphone connectivity and sat-nav.
Nissan’s 1.0-litre engine has fairly a couple of issues in frequent with the items in its rivals. It’s quiet at low revs and doesn’t sound disagreeable even when pushed more durable. It’s additionally happiest in the midst of the rev vary, the place it develops a good 200Nm of torque.
However even with barely extra energy, the Juke feels underpowered and torpid subsequent to the Kamiq and Arona. We recorded a 0-60mph time of 11.Four seconds within the Juke, which was two seconds behind the Kamiq and a pair of.Four seconds off the Arona. Its in-gear outcomes have been poor, too: it went from 30-50mph in fourth in 7.Zero seconds, but it took the Skoda and SEAT simply 6.Zero and 6.Four seconds respectively to do the identical. The Nissan coated 50-70mph in prime gear in 16.2 seconds, whereas the Skoda wanted 11.9 seconds and the SEAT 13.1 seconds, regardless of shorter gearing within the Juke.
A part of the Juke’s poor efficiency is right down to the gearbox. The engine holds its revs too lengthy whenever you change gear, leading to lumpy shifts until you actually take your time, and the shift motion itself is rubbery and imprecise, not like its rivals’ extra exact shifts. The steering is nicely weighted, however there’s no really feel and it’s not as correct because the set-ups within the others.
But the Juke’s largest downside from behind the wheel is its experience. It’s unacceptably poor on British roads, always shuffling and vibrating over each sort of floor. It offers with pace bumps nicely, however some other imperfections are an ordeal, as a result of they crash into the cabin and also you’re perpetually being thrown round in your seat. Physique management and grip are good – the Juke is almost as agile because the Arona – however these elements are largely irrelevant on this class.
The Juke has an adjustable boot flooring and folding rear seats, however just like the Kamiq and Arona, it misses out on a sliding rear bench, which is fitted to another rivals. It has a hard and fast baggage area of 422 litres, which remains to be glorious: it’s bigger than the Skoda and SEAT’s 400-litre capacities. Fold the seats down and there’s rather less room than within the Skoda, although, and the boot opening is narrower than the Kamiq’s. There are 1,305 litres in whole with the rear seats down, which is 90 litres lower than you get within the Skoda. SEAT doesn’t record a determine for the Arona on this configuration.
The moveable boot flooring means you possibly can select between a barely deeper boot and a flatter flooring when the rear seats are folded, although.
Security is a robust level for the brand new Juke. It scored the complete 5 stars in exams by Euro NCAP, and is fitted with a lot of helpful gear as customary. This Tekna mannequin will get parking sensors, a reversing digital camera, lane-keep help, AEB and even blind-spot help as customary, so it’s the best-equipped mannequin right here in terms of security.
Nissan got here 11th within the makers’ chart of our Driver Energy 2019 possession survey, which was a bit behind Skoda’s fifth however forward of SEAT’s 14th.
The Juke returned 41.2mpg on check and can value £1,675 per yr to gas. The Kamiq achieved 45.3mpg, which is £1,523 a yr at present petrol costs, and the Arona recorded 41.4mpg, which works out at £1,667 yearly. These figures are all good and show a three-cylinder petrol unit is a strong alternative of engine in this sort of automobile.
Insurance coverage prices are related in all three vehicles, however the Nissan remains to be the most costly. It prices £380 to cowl our instance driver, whereas it could be £363 within the Skoda and £335 within the SEAT.
“Alongside the handbook gearbox in our check Juke, there’s the choice of a dual-clutch automated similar to the DSG transmission obtainable on its rivals on this check. It prices £1,400, although.”
|Mannequin:||Skoda Kamiq 1.Zero TSI 115 SE L|
|Engine:||1.0-litre 3cyl petrol, 113bhp|
|Check economic system:||45.3mpg/10.0mpl|
|Annual highway tax:||£145|
The Juke has quite a bit to stay as much as due to its well-known identify, however the Kamiq has an excellent more durable activity: ranging from scratch as a completely new automobile for Skoda. It’s bought what it takes, as our present class favorite, although. In SE L type it prices £21,980.
Design & engineering
The Kamiq sits on the Volkswagen Group’s MQB structure in its development, which the Arona additionally makes use of. This platform is utilized in many different fashions, together with Skoda’s Scala, and permits the usage of the group’s 1.0-litre engine, present in Audis, SEATs, VWs and Skodas.
The three-cylinder motor is turbocharged and has 113bhp and 200Nm of torque, which is just under the Nissan’s 115bhp, however the Kamiq is the lightest mannequin of the three, with a kerbweight of 1,158kg.
An possibility known as Sport Chassis Management (£495) is offered on the Skoda, which provides selectable driving modes and adaptive dampers, so you possibly can change how agency the suspension is by altering the driving setting. This selection is slightly expensive, however it’s uncommon to see on a automobile on this class, though the usual suspension set-up is nicely balanced and delivers good experience high quality and secure dealing with.
There’s not a lot visible aptitude within the Kamiq’s cabin. That is true of the Arona as nicely, and the construct high quality is sweet. There are some cheap-looking and feeling plastics in some areas, so you possibly can inform the place prices have been lower, however the giant infotainment show offers the Skoda SUV a contemporary really feel.
Our SE L automobile comes with a 9.2-inch touchscreen with sat-nav, Android Auto and Apple CarPlay performance, plus AEB, lane-keep and blind-spot help. On the choices record there are a couple of attention-grabbing extras, together with a powered tailgate (£400), LED headlights (£1,050) and wi-fi smartphone charging (£235). The Juke and Arona supply way more restricted choices ranges, however a larger variety of trim ranges.
The Kamiq’s energy in terms of the driving expertise is that it balances every key space very nicely. Whereas it’s not excellent in any single space, the Czech mannequin is sweet at just about all the pieces.
Firstly, the experience high quality is about proper: there’s sufficient firmness that physique roll isn’t a problem in quick corners, however it nonetheless smooths out tough sections of tarmac and it’s calm on most roads. It’s gentle sufficient to soak up potholes at low pace, though the set-up isn’t excellent, as a result of there’s a little bit of vibration at motorway speeds, however nowhere close to as a lot as within the Juke. Wind and highway noise are acceptable, so longer journeys aren’t out of the query in any respect.
Plus, whereas it’s not fairly as sharp to drive because the Arona, it’s satisfying sufficient from behind the wheel. There’s loads of grip and its composure in corners means you possibly can carry pace on nation roads. The steering is gentle and doesn’t have sufficient suggestions, however it’s extra exact than the Nissan’s.
The Kamiq was the quickest automobile right here in our in-gear acceleration exams. It was greater than a second faster than the Juke from 30-50mph in third gear, taking 4.2 seconds, which was additionally 0.1 seconds sooner than the Arona. It went from 50-70mph in fifth gear in 8.9 seconds, once more forward of its SEAT sibling (which recorded 9.Four seconds) and nicely forward of the sluggish Nissan (which wanted 12 seconds).
The 1.0-litre engine is simply as quiet at idle because it is within the SEAT Arona, and it by no means sounds harsh or disagreeable within the cabin, even at excessive revs. It has a pleasing thrum, actually, and whereas it’s good to hold it at round 2,000rpm to utilize its most torque of 200Nm, it’s good to drive in a relaxed method.
The gearbox has a light-weight throw, however it’s exact and mechanical sufficient to be satisfying to make use of. The sunshine clutch means it’s no hassle round city, both.
With its 400-litre boot with the rear seats up, and 1,395 litres of area with them folded, the Kamiq may be very sensible. It’s slightly behind the Juke’s 422 litres, and it matches the SEAT’s 400 litres, so all three rating nicely right here.
There’s greater than sufficient room for adults to take a seat comfortably within the rear seats, as a result of there’s a lot of headroom and legroom. There’s additionally sufficient gentle and the comfy seats are simple to entry by way of the rear doorways. But whereas the Skoda is spectacular on this space, it’s not greater by a big margin; each rivals are spacious, too. A good turning circle of 10.1 metres means parking the Kamiq is straightforward, particularly as a result of the steering may be very gentle and visibility is sweet.
EURO NCAP awarded the Skoda 5 stars out of 5 when it was examined not too long ago, scoring very nicely within the Grownup Safety class. Customary security equipment contains six airbags, AEB, blind-spot help and lane-keep help. Aside from the reversing digital camera, which prices £300, it’s about on par with the Juke for security on this sense.
Skoda has scored extremely in a lot of our Driver Energy surveys through the years, and completed fifth in 2019. Nissan got here 11th, whereas SEAT was 14th, so the Skoda is more likely to be a strong possession proposition.
The Skoda and SEAT fashions are fitted with the identical engines, however with an CO2 emissions ranking of 116g/km, the Kamiq sits within the 27 per cent bracket for Profit-in-Sort (BiK) tax contributions.
With CO2 emissions of 114g/km, the Arona is within the 26 per cent class. The Juke can also be within the 27 per cent class, with emissions of 118g/km.
• Finest automobile leasing offers obtainable this yr
These figures imply standard-rate taxpayers will contribute £1,175 this yr in BiK for the Skoda, £1,140 for the SEAT and £1,203 for the Nissan.
“A comparatively giant 50-litre gas tank means the Skoda Kamiq has a variety of practically 500 miles, based mostly on our check economic system figures. That’s a bonus in case you’re making longer journeys”
|Mannequin:||SEAT Arona 1.Zero TSI 115PS FR Sport|
|Engine:||1.0-litre 3cyl petrol, 113bhp|
|Check economic system:||41.4mpg/9.1mpl|
|Annual highway tax:||£145|
The Arona has been a prime automobile on this class because it was launched in 2017, and regardless of being the oldest mannequin right here it’s nonetheless a robust contender. In FR Sport trim the SEAT prices £22,155 with the 1.0-litre 113bhp engine and a handbook transmission.
Design & engineering
This engine is shared with the Kamiq, so the Arona has the identical 200Nm of torque at 2,000rpm. The Juke has an equivalent most torque determine, however in that automobile’s engine it’s delivered decrease down, at 1,750rpm.
The SEAT additionally has a six-speed handbook gearbox and front-wheel drive – four-wheel drive isn’t obtainable. At 4,138mm lengthy and 1,780mm extensive, the Arona is the smallest mannequin right here, however as we’ll see, that doesn’t impression on its practicality. The MQB chassis on which it sits means it has an awesome foundation not only for inside packaging, but additionally for experience and dealing with.
FR and FR Sport fashions include an additional known as SEAT Drive Profile, which provides selectable driving modes. There’s Regular, Sport, Eco and Particular person choices, the latter providing a customisable setting the place you possibly can alter the steering and throttle response – however there aren’t any adaptive dampers obtainable, so you possibly can’t change the extent of consolation. These sportier trim ranges additionally characteristic a unique suspension set-up to different variations, to enhance physique management.
The Arona’s cabin is wise, with a clear and fashionable look that can actually enchantment to some individuals however others will discover a bit uninteresting. Construct high quality is sweet and there are sufficient good-quality supplies in key locations that it feels elegant, primarily right down to the design.
There are only a few choices obtainable on the Arona, and to get extra equipment it’s good to select a better trim degree – even metallic paint comes included, so the record worth is just about what you’ll pay. Customary gear on this FR Sport mannequin is first rate, however it’s a disgrace sure options are lacking: there’s no reversing digital camera, lane-keep or blind-spot help tech obtainable in any respect, nor are you able to add keyless go. What you do get is 18-inch alloys, adaptive cruise management, LED lights, a digital instrument cluster and an eight-inch touchscreen infotainment system with 3D sat-nav mapping and smartphone connectivity.
The SEAT Arona stays one of many best-handling vehicles on this class, and it combines this with good experience high quality.
The steering is quite a bit like it’s within the Kamiq: it’s gentle and exact however doesn’t supply a lot, if any, really feel or suggestions. There’s loads of grip, and with the FR Sport trim’s sportier suspension, the SEAT resists physique roll greater than its Skoda cousin. This provides you extra confidence to hold pace into corners, but it’s not so stiff that consolation is a matter. The Arona doesn’t glide over bumps within the highway, and also you’ll discover harsh actions coming into the cabin from time to time, however on the entire it’s comfortable sufficient, and it’s definitely much more composed and smoother than the Juke.
The gearshift is gentle however has a fairly brief throw and a mechanical really feel, so it’s satisfying to make use of, similar to within the Skoda. The 1.0-litre engine is quiet at low revs, so the Arona stays fairly refined at regular speeds, and also you’ll solely hear wind and highway noise at greater speeds. Add some extra revs and you may hear a thrummy three-cylinder engine be aware.
Efficiency is a robust level right here, too. The 113bhp engine carried the Arona from 0-60mph in 9 seconds flat in our straight-line exams, which was the quickest right here, and whereas the SEAT was barely behind the Skoda in our in-gear exams, it’s not noticeably slower on the highway.
The driving place may very well be higher, although. Taller drivers may discover that there’s not sufficient adjustment, particularly within the steering column, to discover a comfy place behind the wheel. The seats may very well be extra comfy, too.
Regardless of its smaller footprint in contrast with its rivals, the SEAT nonetheless matches the Skoda’s boot area, at 400 litres. Each are 22 litres behind the Nissan right here, however all three vehicles have first rate baggage capability.
Visibility is sweet, and the sunshine controls imply the Arona is straightforward to drive and park, even in tight areas.
The rear seats are large enough for adults, however solely simply. An extended journey within the again may trigger some aches and pains for taller passengers, however it is going to be roomy sufficient for teenagers to be comfy. There’s no subject with headroom, both, as a result of adults can nearly sit up within the again. Inside storage is okay, with a big cubby in entrance of the gearlever to your cellphone, which is beneficial whenever you’re utilizing Android Auto or Apple CarPlay through the USB port there.
You get six airbags and autonomous braking as customary within the Arona, however there’s no lane-keep help or blind-spot monitoring, so it lags behind its newer rivals on this space. You’ll be able to’t even add them as choices, as a result of they’re simply not obtainable with this trim degree. The upper-spec Xcellence will get blind-spot help, although.
SEAT’s sellers got here in 19th place in our Driver Energy 2019 survey, which was forward of Nissan’s 28th place, however behind Skoda’s 10th-place end.
Our depreciation specialists say the Arona has the bottom residual values right here. After three years or 36,000 miles, it’s predicted to retain 44.Eight per cent of its value when new, which is a drop of £12,241 in that point to a worth of £9,914.
The Juke holds 50.5 per cent, a lack of £11,144 to a worth of £11,351. Lastly, the Skoda sits in between the others, with a residual worth of 48.1 per cent, which implies it sheds £11,405 for a ultimate worth of £10,575.
“A tyre restore equipment is included as customary on the Arona, however you possibly can pay £110 to get a space-saver spare wheel. It’s one of many solely choices you possibly can add with the SEAT.”
First place: Skoda Kamiq
The Skoda is a transparent winner right here as a result of it has the widest vary of skill. It’s comfy sufficient more often than not and practically pretty much as good to drive because the Arona, whereas additionally having extra room for passengers, good in-gear efficiency and low working prices. It has the most effective infotainment of the bunch, too, and working prices will probably be low. Worth for cash is excessive for all of those causes, so the Kamiq stays on the prime of the category.
Second place: SEAT Arona
Though it’s been on sale for some time now, the SEAT Arona remains to be a really robust contender. Its infotainment and inside aren’t fairly as much as the usual of the Skoda right here, however it’s a match for the Nissan, and nearly each different facet of the driving expertise is healthier than the newcomer: it’s enjoyable to drive, comfy sufficient and simpler to stay with. It’s sensible and has all of the equipment you’d need, too.
Third place: Nissan Juke
The brand new Nissan Juke is a disappointment, principally due to its unacceptably harsh experience. Poor efficiency, an disagreeable handbook gearbox and a excessive worth harm its enchantment additional, however it’s not with out benefit. It’s spacious inside, particularly the boot, and there’s a lot of customary equipment, notably security gear. The engine is quiet and it’s a major step on from its predecessor when it comes to inside high quality and infotainment.
Value ready for?
Value: from £20,150
Engine: 1.2-litre 3cyl, 128bhp
Peugeot’s newest 2008 SUV will arrive within the UK early this yr. It’s an all-new mannequin with distinctive styling and a contemporary inside, plus new engine choices, together with an all-electric model. It’ll be priced competitively with its rivals right here.
|Skoda Kamiq 1.Zero TSI 115 SE L||SEAT Arona 1.Zero TSI 115PS FR Sport||Nissan Juke 1.Zero DIG-T 117 Tekna|
|On the highway worth/whole as examined||£21,980/£25,790||£22,155/£22,155||£22,495/£23,640|
|Residual worth (after 3yrs/36,000)||£10,575/48.1%||£9,914/44.8%||£11,351/50.5%|
|Annual tax legal responsibility std/greater fee||£1,175/£2,349||£1,140/£2,281||£1,203/£2,405|
|Annual gas value (12ok/20ok miles)||£1,523/£2,539||£1,667/£2,778||£1,675/£2,792|
|Insurance coverage group/quote/highway tax value||12/£363/£145||12/£335/£145||14/£380/£145|
|Servicing prices||£342 (2 years)||£384 (2 years)||£209/£289 (min/maj)|
|Engine||3cyl in-line/999cc||3cyl in-line/999cc||3cyl in-line/999cc|
|Peak energy/revs||113/5,000 bhp/rpm||113/5,000 bhp/rpm||115/5,250 bhp/rpm|
|Peak torque/revs||200/2,000 Nm/rpm||200/2,000 Nm/rpm||200/1,750 Nm/rpm|
|Transmission||6-speed man/fwd||6-speed man/fwd||6-speed man/fwd|
|Gas tank capability/spare wheel||50 litres/restore equipment||40 litres/restore equipment||46 litres/restore equipment|
|Boot capability (seats up/down)||400/1,395 litres||400 litres/N/A||422/1,305 litres|
|Turning circle||10.1 metres||10.6 metres||11.Zero metres|
|Primary guarantee (miles)/restoration||3yrs (60,000)/3yrs||3yrs (60,000)/2yrs||3yrs (60,000)/3yrs|
|Driver Energy producer/vendor pos.||fifth/10th||14th/19th||11th/28th|
|0-60/30-70mph||9.4/9.5 secs||9.0/9.2 secs||11.4/11.4secs|
|30-50mph in third/4th||4.2/6.Zero secs||4.3/6.Four secs||5.3/7.Zero secs|
|50-70mph in fifth/sixth||8.9/11.9 secs||9.4/13.1 secs||12.0/16.2 secs|
|Prime pace/rpm at 70mph||120mph/2,400rpm||118mph/2,300rpm||112mph/2,500rpm|
|Auto Specific econ. (mpg/mpl)/vary||45.3/10.0/498 miles||41.4/9.1/364 miles||41.2/9.1/417 miles|
|WLTP mixed mpg||42.8-47.1mpg||43.5-47.1mpg||46.3mpg|
|WLTP mixed mpl||9.4-10.4mpl||9.6-10.4mpl||10.2mpl|
|Precise/claimed CO2/tax bracket||144/116g/km/27%||158/114g/km/26%||158/118g/km/27%|
|Airbags/Isofix/park sensors/digital camera||Six/sure/sure/£300||Six/sure/sure/no||Six/sure/sure/sure|
|Auto field/lane-keep/blind spot/AEB||£1,250/sure/sure/sure||£1,080/no/no/sure||£1,400/sure/sure/sure|
|Clim./cruise ctrl/leather-based/heated seats||Sure/y/£1,280*/£250||Sure/sure/no/sure||Sure/sure/artificial/sure|
|Met paint/LEDs/keyless/pwr tailgate||£595/sure/sure/£400||Sure/sure/no/no||£575/sure/sure/no|
|Nav/digital sprint/DAB/related apps||Sure/sure/sure/sure||Sure/sure/sure/sure||Sure/no/sure/sure|
|Wi-fi cost/CarPlay/Android Auto||£235/sure/sure||Sure/sure/sure||No/sure/sure|